How are views and fan points calculated for celebs?-pg 4/29 Modnote 40 - Page 6

Originally posted by: riti4u

Dear Admin,we raise our concern as we see that even when our pic views are consistently high , we are noticing a drop in view points. I agree this is relative and not absolute system . Even if it is relative, view points are 50% of highest when the photo gallery views are more from our side. If this is about profile views or other things .then that data is not visible to us to make judgement fair enough. We are noticing a drastic change in viewpoint and thus our concern.Kindly make this viewpoint business more transparent.. so that we can be aware of where we lack and where we need to improve...Thanks

Originally posted by: KittenRose

This is a good suggestion, people can evaluate things, at the end when result comes, it is total disappointment and can't help thinking things being manipulated.

and for comments, we can always count pages of comments...for fans we have incr in no. of fans...but for views...where do i check apart from views given in photo gallery...we dont even know how much of that percentage you are taking into account...

Originally posted by: riti4u

ofcourse when things are not clear...we really dont know where we are going wrong...We have increased pic views as I can see .. I dont have absolute data with me...but we have improved our photo gallery views...n still this much difference is quite surprising..when we have highest comments our way...people do visit profile to comment ... n also with likes on each comment we were doing decent job...really dont knw where we are lagging and that too...nothing is improving even when we are doubling our efforts...this is so demotivating..and if this is case ..whats the use of actually viewing more...😕

got this from comment section courtesy serendipity235kindly provide an answer if you people are fair."Observation: I checked the total views of the first 25 pics (first page of photo gallery) of the current ranks 1 and 2, about 3 hrs ago. These were the figures:
Rank 1: 19,994
Rank 2: 26,104.
These pics were put up in both profiles around the same time, so the timeframe for comparison is the same.
The views in the next 3-4 pages followed the same pattern more or less..I cant imagine that the other pics will have drastically different trends. So where is the anomaly coming from? At worst, rank 1 and 2 should have approx. equal views..certainly not 50% less as shown in the ranking figures.
I bring this up because a lot of people put in a lot of effort..its not just effort, but emotions are involved too. Can we not get an explanation for the wide discrepancy in the actual and depicted figures??
"

Originally posted by: riti4u

got this from comment section courtesy serendipity235kindly provide an answer if you people are fair."Observation: I checked the total views of the first 25 pics (first page of photo gallery) of the current ranks 1 and 2, about 3 hrs ago. These were the figures:
Rank 1: 19,994
Rank 2: 26,104.
These pics were put up in both profiles around the same time, so the timeframe for comparison is the same.
The views in the next 3-4 pages followed the same pattern more or less..I cant imagine that the other pics will have drastically different trends. So where is the anomaly coming from? At worst, rank 1 and 2 should have approx. equal views..certainly not 50% less as shown in the ranking figures.
I bring this up because a lot of people put in a lot of effort..its not just effort, but emotions are involved too. Can we not get an explanation for the wide discrepancy in the actual and depicted figures??
"

deepthi di...i wont say there is manipulation 😆..but then we have only pics views as our data... then how can we check where we are lacking...there shud be some transparency here... and why this sudden gap between 1st ,2nd and even 3 rd for that matter in viewpoints...thus my only concern is- Yes people can make assumption of manipulation...so in order to make system here transparent...please bring into account profile views being listed or views being listed on each tab then... so that we know this is where difference is..and we are not left to our assumption...

Originally posted by: riti4u

deepthi di...i wont say there is manipulation 😆..but then we have only pics views as our data... then how can we check where we are lacking...there shud be some transparency here... and why this sudden gap between 1st ,2nd and even 3 rd for that matter in viewpoints...thus my only concern is- Yes people can make assumption of manipulation...so in order to make system here transparent...please bring into account profile views being listed or views being listed on each tab then... so that we know this is where difference is..and we are not left to our assumption...

I really wish someone answer soon...coz i feel like I am wasting my time here😆

Answer Do...Answer Do...We want an Answer...We want an Answer...

I am not hiding my dislike here and i feel BS and his fandom is being sidelined in this site, that reflect is ranking too.