Attention Vijay, query about new rules regardin WL

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

illuminated.

@illuminated.

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

There is no personal vendetta or grudge against anyone. This is being blown out of proportion now. I am only doing what I was asked to do.

@Pentaminous: Please PM the concerned DT about your WL.

Quote

@_Manpreet_

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

Hi,

The matter is currently being looked into on behalf of Miss Cherie and Admin Vijay will be consulted regarding the same and we will get back to Cherie promptly, as already had been informed to her via PM.

Thank you,

Regards,

S/C DT

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

689471

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

I am still waiting on an answer from the DT as well because Saraa advised me that only one WL can be removed at a time when I asked for the one she put on there to be removed. Why tell an individual that a WL can be removed after 3 months if there are no further WL within that 3 month periods? Fair enough... but it is not even clearly stated in the rules/regulations/guidelines. Both my WLs were more that 3 months old and I did not understand how they could be removed until Vijay explained to be how I can get it done in his thread.

As far as I'm concerned, ambiguity and lack of discretion has cause a lot of the problems that are happening here in regards to WL. How can an individual contact a DT member about WL at an earlier date before "New Rules" are established if they have no idea about how a particular feature of the forum works?

@ IILoveMyself..., I totally agree with you.

Just a hypothetical question..., Say for instance a man committed a crime 30 years ago that warranted a sentence of 35 years in jail. A few weeks before he is released a new law is established that this particular crime he committed warrants death by lethal injection. Should he automatically be put on death-row because of the new law or released because he's served his sentence?

I believe he would be released because the law does not apply to him as it was established after he was tried and sentenced plus he's served his punishment.

This is just an example concerning the Law. There is a huge difference between Laws, Rules, Regulations and Guidelines. They are not the same and so they should not be treat the.

@Radha, I saw your note and I understand that the DT is dealing with the matter but I just wanted to air my views as well.

Edited by Olive_Rose - 12 years ago

Quote

872196

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#14

I support miss cherrie.. her wl should be lower as there was clear 2 day difference between 3 months period getting over for previous WL and starting of application of new rules for WL.. and her record was also clear so why her wl is not reduced ..😕

Quote

Ain

@OnepoundChic

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#15

i too agree with the fellows..if one member has completed a 3 month 'warned period' without any further warning ,then on the due date his/her WL should be reduced according to rules nd regulation whatsoever . And i totally agree with aimz ,there should be a crystal clear criteria for gifting WL to members,depending upon the extent of violating rules than no. of times one violated it or MODS just love to play warning level warning level?

Edited by OnepoundChic - 12 years ago

Quote

Rukhsar Ahmed

@ruky786

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#16

Speaking of WL can mine be reduced as well? It's ridiculous mods are not being consistent and just having a hoopla about not reducing our WL. It's like this is what they want, they don't want to help us at all. Tut waste man...

Quote

swati1975us

@swati1975us

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#17

Unfortunately, this website has developed a very warped idea of what "moderation" is truly about. Ideally the forums should be a free and fair platform for discussion about anything related to the shows and the people involved in those shows. Only things like clear spamming, po*nographic content and religious and ethnic hate speech should be removed promptly.

Instead what we get are DT teams acting like mini-dictators concocting absurd rules about what can or cannot be discussed, arbitrarily closing threads and handing out WLs for members who are merely trying to have a conversation.

People need to get used to the fact that not everything being said here would be pleasant or palatable to them and live with it.

I've had the pleasure of having many great conversations with Miss Cherie here and can say that she really makes this forum such a fun, vibrant place to be in. I really do hope her post counts are not restricted like this.

Quote

610366

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: swati1975us
Unfortunately, this website has developed a very warped idea of what "moderation" is truly about. Ideally the forums should be a free and fair platform for discussion about anything related to the shows and the people involved in those shows. Only things like clear spamming, po*nographic content and religious and ethnic hate speech should be removed promptly.

Instead what we get are DT teams acting like mini-dictators concocting absurd rules about what can or cannot be discussed, arbitrarily closing threads and handing out WLs for members who are merely trying to have a conversation.

People need to get used to the fact that not everything being said here would be pleasant or palatable to them and live with it.

I've had the pleasure of having many great conversations with Miss Cherie here and can say that she really makes this forum such a fun, vibrant place to be in. I really do hope her post counts are not restricted like this.

👏 well said 😊

Quote

771081

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: NicklausBarbie
Thank Goodness that I haven't visited Hairun Hoboti shrine long since April !!
That rotten forum and its mods 'yawns' the less said the better
-_- -_-

Hello Vijay,

Will you increase the WL of this user as he/she resorted to name calling of a celeb which is clearly against your rules or will you turn a blind eye to this ?

Originally posted by: vijay

Celebrity Slander : We understand that you are not going to be a fan of all celebrities but that does not allow anyone to resort to name calling .We do not want anyone riling up fans of particular celebrities and hence making the section a warzone. Don't mock fans as it's not a crime to love a celebrity and do not be sarcastic and pass it off as humor.

Edited by -pavitra- - 12 years ago

Quote

Blue Rose

@uniquebluerose

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#20

I totally support this post and TM and many others...

I have my warning level raised and i do not even know for which particular post of mine it has been raised!!!I tried PMing the Mod who has increased my warning level but even she was wondering which warning level...does that mean there is no record whatsoever of why a warning level is increased...Shouldn't a PM be first be sent????? and what warrants a warning...if i blame a fan group which is on DT side then can i have warning...eg... there is post degrading a character, the CVs and calling them names...and i object to it...my warning level is raised...can know even clarification be sought????

or probably a warning in PM asking me edit it out whatever was offensive!!!!

Quote

1 2 3 4

Vijay

Attention Vijay, query about new rules regardin WL - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics