Unequal Justice of Ayodhya - Page 2

I have no words to add as I liked all posts which I could agree with.

Every time when I read or see this, I feel so disgusted for Siya ji and this makes me hate and dislike Ram ji a lot. I've said in another thread some days ago, and saying it again, I won't ever be able to forgive this injustice towards Siya ji. For God's sake, she was pregnant at that time and despite knowing this , Ram ji abandoned her in the most difficult to survive forest. Where was humanity in all this? I don't want to continue writing about this as I may start bashing or criticizing Ram ji unnecessarily/ necessarily.
Anyway... this is the part which I never appreciated in Ramayana.


Else otherwise, I love Ramayana and it's values.

You've point but your question is wrong. How do you believe Ayodhya people judged her and Kaikeyi? Did they order her to go exile? it's Ram who ordered her to go exile. Did they complain her impurity(just case) against Ram? No.But They had their own criticism on Ram-Sita as they had on others Trust me, even if Ram announced Sita exile before them ,They wouldve pleaded Ram to change his decision. Sita exile not acknowledged to anyone even sita herself. Untill she reached Valmiki Hermitage , she didn't know Ram left Her. So it's a kind of unfair to claim they showed partiality. Basically i want highlight few points about Exile. First and First of all, Ram-Sita lived in their Era so Criticism and Gossiping are inevitable. Even now they are facing criticism. so we must not expect Ayodhya people to accept them without having doubts. Second thing is, Sita's exile isn't Male vs Female perception which 99.9999999999% arguements highlighting. I Really want to say what is the exact gossip of Ayodhya ...Couldn't believe LUST OVER SITA MADE KING RAMA KEEP HER AS QUEEN EVEN THOUGH SHE SPENT DAYS IN RAAVAN PLACE... i really surprised how people play Victim card for Sita though Rama also criticized as lustful person. didn't they know or didn't want to hear? when Dasarath married three wives ,people didn't criticize him as lustful person until kaikeyi boons are granted. Everyone Knows lust over Sita made Raavan to fall but none of his ministers couldn't dare to tell him. even in Rama case,i believe no one had courage to badmouth against Sita front of Ram. but it was street gossiping how can we expect Rama to close gossiping. Again i must say Rama-Sita aren't first victims , even Kaikeyi and Dasarath also faced severe criticisms when Ram was announced to exile. People are love to criticise the people who can't they become. Rama - Sita are peerless. but after Sita kidnapped,People get point to criticise how we critcise Rama's decision. Rama wasn't the first king who faced criticisms but He is the girst and probably only King who believed that he must be above suspicion.No one would have compainted him but gossiping wouldve been lived for ever. Its Rama-Sita Decision made them suffer but lead their glories lives forever. in fact throughout Ramayana,people can see how Rama believed in his dharma.[B]infact Rama himself stated to Sita that He might leave his life,Lakshmana even her but he wouldnt compromise his Honour and Word[ /B] Even though Sita was hurt when she announced for exile, She knows Rama's Decision was Right and inevitable. Thats what made then ideal king-queen atleast i believe But everything started after it changed as gender perception. so called feminists claimed Sita bhumipravesh as her Respect as she only victim in Ram and Ayodhya peopes decision Rama vs Sita arguement lead to unmeaning while both are best at their commitments. P.S: Sorry for delay.I left this forum long ago so couldnt see this topic before.

Whenever I think of Ramayana, I feel sad for Sita. She was punished for no fault of her.