megnath attraction 4 urmila - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

7k

Users

9

Likes

21

Frequent Posters

zaara610 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#11
I have read about this..interesting..!!!😊.
_shadesnature_ thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#12
Ramayana is not limited to what we know there are so many hidden facts and unknown theories may be its one of them
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#13
its it popular believe that meghnad only had one wife but he never took ek patni vrat. like ravan had multiple wives but focus was mainly on mandodri always.
meghnad too wanted become immortal , when 4 d first time he failed 2 kill Lakshman again & again , raavan & gang got worried that what is saving Lakshman from his death as they know ram was sheild by sita's satitva. kakesi got 2 know about urmila & her sacrifice 4 Lakshman ( her long sleep on a/c of Lakshman) & suggested raavan 2 marry meghnad 2 urmila, first meghnad refused but later did agreed. this is one of reason of downfall of meghnad & satitva of sulochna.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#14
Meghnad never fell for Urmila.

Unlike Ravan, he was not a womanizer and was faithful to Sulochana. She was his only life and she was the love of his life. He never looked at another woman.

The only reason Sulochana's satitva could not save Meghnaad was because he was supporting a wrong cause.

As powerful as a pativrata stree is, if she supports adharma, she is bound to lose.

That is why pious women like Mandodari (who is a celebrated pativrata) and Sulochana lost their husbands despite their satitva.

This is the biggest proof that dharma trumps everything, including satitva.

A woman should not support her husband if he is behaving in a wrong way, or if he supports the wrong path. If she tries to use the power of chastity for adharmic purposes, then she is bound to lose.
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#15
dear there many stories untold , no series of Ramayana had showed regarding ram's sister shanta's story till date.
basically I m from Lucknow , my father is member of hanuman community , this community had many people around d world , there r many stories told by them which I got shocked. do u will believe hanumanji broked mandodri's satitva.
meghnad was luving 2 wards sulochna but no where it is mentioned that he took ek patni vrat, vaise none of Ramayana show meghnad story from starting he enter after sita haran only. meghnad is always mention as a duty full son , his luvstory sulochna is never shown.
I had heard that urmila's needra story is true one acc 2 it during shakti hitting Lakshman scenerio urmila 2 felt d pain2 she too started feeling unwell
there many untold stories.
Ramayana had 300 versions
Edited by deepikagupta9 - 9 years ago
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

dear there many stories untold , no series of Ramayana had showed regarding ram's sister shanta's story till date.
basically I m from Lucknow , my father is member of hanuman community , this community had many people around d world , there r many stories told by them which I got shocked. do u will believe hanumanji broked mandodri's satitva.
meghnad was luving 2 wards sulochna but no where it is mentioned that he took ek patni vrat, vaise none of Ramayana show meghnad story from starting he enter after sita haran only. meghnad is always mention as a duty full son , his luvstory sulochna is never shown.
I had heard that urmila's needra story is true one acc 2 it during shakti hitting Lakshman scenerio urmila 2 felt d pain2 she too started feeling unwell
there many untold stories.
Ramayana had 300 versions


Although 300 versions of Ramayan are out there, the most original one is Valmiki Ramayana, and personally I do not believe any story that depicts Godly character in an immoral.

For example, Lord Hanuman is an ansh of Lord Shiva himself. Would he ever break a woman's satitva? 🤢 I have heard this story before but it disgusts me and my heart tells me it's most definitely not true. Why would God behave in the same way as his wayward devotee Ravan, to kill whom he had to take the incarnation of Hanuman?

Just because there are 300 versions doesn't make them all true. We have to use our brains and intellect to understand which stories are worthy of being passed down and which are not.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".