Why no analysis for yesterday. One day I disappeared from forum no analysis. This is not fair. @DD read your analysis of Saturday. You have analyzed all the parts. Have made a separate post on Hanuman eating the super market. That scene was actually in line with Hanuman's character. Yes Hanuman is called first among astute or first among intelligent. His intelligence is unparalleled. And the key difference between Lakshman and Hanuman is emotions.
If you see in Lakshman the emotions flows. Ram has to step in to control Lakshman emotions, else though in love it can un intentionally hurt someone, or he himself can get hurt.
But now come to Hanuman. What differentiates Hanuman from Lakshman is the perfect control on emotions. Hanuman love to tease. He irritates , makes others angry, but then he smiles all by himself. In a way you can say that Hanuman plays with other's weakness. He knows where to press the button so that desired reaction is observed. If you watch Hanuman in Lanka sabha and all it will be laugh riot. The Lankans are exasperated by the Monkey. And once he runs around with the fire in his tail it is mayhem and panic in Lanka.
In MB we call Krishna's Leelas, but in Ramayan that credit goes to Hanuman. He brings the positivity. He brings light at the far end of a tunnel. He sees Sita. He brings Sanjeevani.
And that scene in which he takes bananas from kiddos hands was a clear cut message. Look what you have than observe, stare what others have. If you do that you will lose what you will have also. This principle is there in MB. The wealth and prosperity of Indraprastha makes Kauravas jealous. They decide to take it by force and result they lose everything including life.
They never cares for what they have. And even Hanuman teases Bhima's pride in MB. Lift the tail. Poor Bhima. He surrenders. But then Hanuman gives his brother knowledge.
So we need to know that in MB if Arjun gets knowledge from Krishna, Bhima too gets knowledge from Hanuman. Maybe that is why Bhima is unperturbed in the war unlike Arjuna who gets knowledge only at that point.
And it is said that wherever Narayan is, Hanuman will be there. Just like Hanuman guarding Arjuna's chariot, while Krishna was driving it. It is also an indication that if you follow Krishna's direction, Shiva will be automatically there to protect you.
Now coming to yesterday episode. I was really busy. Couldn't make separate post. But will make one. For me it dealt with finding the purpose with Hanuman Adithya scene. Sita gifting Ram with idols of his family. I felt an irony to it. Ram celebrating his birthday away from family because the purpose of his life demanded that separation. Now again will there be a birthday for him with the family but without his soulmate as once again the purpose in his life demands that separation.
Once again Athri Muni asking Ram to keep Sita in ashram because of demons. The question that begs answer. Every point there is a hint of Siya-Ram separation which is averted one way or the other by Sita, till the banishment happens.
So was separation in their niyati. See the brute way both the seperations happen. Quite unexpected. Ravan taking Sita and then Ram has to send her to exile on a night. I was thinking quite deeply on the same after watching the episode. Will try to put more points on it when I get conclusive points.
Edited by shruthiravi - 9 years ago
Udne Ki Aasha
