{|Siya ke Ram - Episode Distortion & Frustration Thread 1|} - Page 74

Originally posted by: Arijit007

well, even skr's ravan showed some devotion, he said, "so what if i can't lift this dhanush, may be it's my aradhya, my mahadev's wish." and he left the building.

Really?Then he is not a gone case.I need to see the epi.

Originally posted by: radianteyes.

No ⭐️ mandvi today
Balika ko apni agyanta ka ahsas hogaya
While the shiv tandava strata is amazing it gives me chills when I recite it

I love the Shiv Tandav stotra.Its so divine and powerful.

This is not the first time someone's arrogance and pride has got the better of their Bhakti.. I think it has happened Narada Muni too..
Hence the fact that they showed Raavan's arrogance getting the better of his Bhakti was acceptable for me. Raavan certainly was a true bhakt of Lord Shiva. But once he got his boons and became invincible and almost deathless (his boons made sure of that atleast to his own mind as he did not think men came any closer to winning against him), his pride and arrogance was sure to grow unbridled.
Hence the fact that he let his arrogance speak was ok.
His reaction to failing to lift the Dhanush by lashing out at King Janak and Sita ji was also along expected lines.. With pride comes the fall and that fall.. some cannot accept.

I think while this time Raavan has been consumed by his own contempt for others and his pride and has not noticed Sita ji at all. He was clear he was here for the Dhanush. But it would be a totally different story when it comes to Sita haran... Or could be just vengeance for now?. Given that we will not get the actual Valmiki Ramayana, the story can be taken anyway..

@Justlikethat1 - oh yeah, that can be a possibility..in his anger, he did not pay much attention to her. Just a look and that was it.

Was Sitaji's birth such a surprise to all Aryavad as per Ramayana? I have always assumed that her birth personified her divinity and hence the kings fought each other to marry her.. But today in the episode it was shown that Raavan outs the secret (BTW, Sita's sisters did not know this secret and yet they were unfazed.😕).. Can someone please clarify?

Originally posted by: Justlikethat1

Was Sitaji's birth such a surprise to all Aryavad as per Ramayana? I have always assumed that her birth personified her divinity and hence the kings fought each other to marry her.. But today in the episode it was shown that Raavan outs the secret (BTW, Sita's sisters did not know this secret and yet they were unfazed.😕).. Can someone please clarify?

nope, sita was of divine birth and everyone knew that.

Originally posted by: ---Anu---

@Justlikethat1 - oh yeah, that can be a possibility..in his anger, he did not pay much attention to her. Just a look and that was it.

Only after Shurpanakha plays out her card, which she has to anyway, to get the story moving, will he remember this episode.

Anu, I am Harini😊 Raavan may remember this incident.. I am waiting to see if he is shown driven by vengeance for what happened today. But I think Surpanaka probably tells him that Shri Ram rejected her because his wife was the most beautiful woman she has seen leading to Raavan wanting to possess Sitaji.

@JustLikeThat,I think that Ravan was too obsessed with the dhanush to think about anything else.Maybe that's why he did not pay any attention.to Sita.Acc to Devdutt Pattnaik's book,he falls in love with Sita after Surpanakha describes her beauty to him.I feel that since this book is inspired a lot by DP's book,we may get to see that.

Originally posted by: Astoria

@JustLikeThat,I think that Ravan was too obsessed with the dhanush to think about anything else.Maybe that's why he did not pay any attention.to Sita.Acc to Devdutt Pattnaik's book,he falls in love with Sita after Surpanakha describes her beauty to him.I feel that since this book is inspired a lot by DP's book,we may get to see that.

@Everyone,Why on earth is the issue of Sita being born from earth is highlighted every time?First Chandrabhaga,then this.They are trying to show as if Sita being adopted is a disadvantage and no one would marry her coz of that.This sounds so cliched and typical daily soap like.

You may well be right about Sita Haran.😊

As for Sitaji's birth issue.. this is not the first time it is happening and this will probably be brought up again (I have a strong feeling by Kaikeyi) in the future..
Somehow the CVs cannot help themselves in showing the Female Lead as some kind of bechari whenever they get a chance. So much for feminism..
In Ramayan, Sitaji really did go through a lot but the fact of her birth was not one of them.

Originally posted by: Justlikethat1

You may well be right about Sita Haran.😊

As for Sitaji's birth issue.. this is not the first time it is happening and this will probably be brought up again (I have a strong feeling by Kaikeyi) in the future..
Somehow the CVs cannot help themselves in showing the Female Lead as some kind of bechari whenever they get a chance. So much for feminism..
In Ramayan, Sitaji really did go through a lot but the fact of her birth was not one of them.