The case is not as simple as it seems. I don’t know why people and more importantly TV writers have this misconception that by making one negative you can justify another’s wrongdoing.
Veer’s family is cheap – I completely agree with it.
The way Veer is handling his situation is wrong – I agree.
Arnav has been real mature about his heartbreak – No doubt about it.
Veer deserves a slap when he hurls abuse at Mishti (As per the promo) – Absolutely
But one thing some people conveniently forget is that MishAan aren’t really gems either.
Yes, the way Ruhann treats Mishti – every girl deserves it and Mishti had every right to choose what’s best for her.
But her engagement with Veer, it wasn’t an arranged one and she has practically wasted Veer’s one year to realize her feelings and that too when they were about to get married.
Women face the worst of it when a relation is broken but that doesn’t mean men don’t face anything. Veer comes from an upper class family and yet he had to listen to BS like there must have been some fault with him or whether he is gay or not – are these things really light?
Arnav’s heart has been broken but Pari had never led him to believe anything. She had always been vocal about her feelings that she respects him and loves him but only as a friend. In her over-enthusiasm she told him about Ruhaan and that was criticized, rightfully. Then leading someone to believe that I am so in love with you and then telling him that hamare beechmein kabhi kuch tha hi nahi – how justified is that???
One should remember, it wasn’t a casual breakup. They were about to get married and Veer really loved Mishti. So three weeks is more than enough for him to snap out of it?
In the long run it's best for MishVeer. But it's not as easy or trivial as many think because Veer had no clue about it, they didn't fight, Mishti showed no inclination toward anyone and then BAM!!! tumse shaadi nahi kar sakti. Which person in real world would take that easily????
Veer is wrong but that doesn’t make MishAan better. They are happy together, they understand each other and that’s great. But they have practically started their world on the destruction of someone else’s dream who used to be very close to them. The situation and gender is different but it’s same as Mauli crying alone at her room while her so call best friend consummating with her husband.
And one thing that I keep reading about that Veer is controlling and everything, isn’t Mishti the same? Even she is a control freak but when Ruhaan puts up with it, it is supposed to be cute but when Mishti is in the picture it is Veer’s chauvinism?
And even if he is, which the writer has been portraying lately, why did Mishti agree to it? On one hand it makes her a very poor judge of people’s character. And if she really planned to live her life with a pseudo-gentleman to avoid her heartache, then that would make her exactly what Veer is alleging her to be. Obviously she is not a gold-digger but definitely a planner who chose the perfect option for her irrespective of how it would affect others.
My purpose is not to throw mud at Mishti/Mishaan and defend Veer’s horrendous works.
Any crime that is committed against a woman will always be termed as criminal offense and if Veer really is the kidnapper, he deserves the strictest punishment.
But a sheep in disguise/hamara Mishtu bach gayi – Mishti herself isn’t as innocent as the writer/some fans want her to be.