Veer is Mauli of season 2? - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

88

Views

6.2k

Users

20

Likes

291

Frequent Posters

441597 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: jhalak7


Understand the difference of love and marriage first and then reply. Love and marriage are not same. Comparing to cheating is nothing comparing to cheating in marriage...as marriage is just not between you two.
If you arer unmarried you will never understand why I said cheating doesn't matter as they are not married. ...

read the para 2. ...








Doesn't matter if I'm married or not. We're talking about morals here. If I'm in a relationship with someone and cheat on them, then I'm committing an immoral act.


A marriage is first and foremost between the couple, and then everyone else. Everyone else and society is secondary. If the person I love cheats on me, then I'll be devastated. That devastation will not become unimportant just because I'm not married to that person.


You need to understand that marriage is nothing but a social and legal certificate. Two people who are in a live-in relation also have an equally valid bond as two people who are married.

The pain of heartbreak does not reduce just because I did not yet sign the contract of marriage. Saying that cheating is okay if you're not married is an insult to all non-marital romantic relationships. Don't be so narrow in your thinking.
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#32
Jhalak7:
I did say that I agree that cheating in marriage is worse. But how can you say that cheating in love does not matter AT ALL? Isn't it insulting the people who get heartbroken because their love cheated on them?

How can you be so casual about cheating in relationships? Love is not a joke. Just because marriage has society involved, does not mean that only cheating in marriage is wrong.

Many people do not believe in marriage and social norms. Their relationship does not matter? Kindly think before you make a statement.
jhalak7 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

Jhalak7:

I did say that I agree that cheating in marriage is worse. But how can you say that cheating in love does not matter AT ALL? Isn't it insulting the people who get heartbroken because their love cheated on them?

How can you be so casual about cheating in relationships? Love is not a joke. Just because marriage has society involved, does not mean that only cheating in marriage is wrong.

Many people do not believe in marriage and social norms. Their relationship does not matter? Kindly think before you make a statement.


The title of this thread is Mauli and Veer's comparison. One was a married woman and another a single guy...I thought you read the title and understood why I wrote
cheating in love doesn't matter at all...Yes I skipped " comparing to marriage " ... as I thought it is not needed to be mentioned as the TM already mentioned that. ...
Edited by jhalak7 - 6 years ago
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: jhalak7


As I have told earlier cheating in love doesn't matter at all in love comparing to marriage ...because love and marriage is not same and you will understand this when you will get married and go through the whole world change. In love you are still there where you can start fresh. How is this and marriage where your entire world is change can be same?
Mauli's start can't be compared to Veer's start. If I see Mauli...Veer's start is nothing. He doesn't have a child and seven years relationship where he lost his family, his health , respect , honor, money, time like Mauli did. If I see Mauli's seven+6 years ...what is Veer? He is nothing comparing to Mauli's life.

This post is about Veer and Mauli...so I thought you will understand why I wrote that ...


Nobody is comparing Veer's pain to Mauli's. Of course Mauli's pain would be more, that is natural.

But does that mean the Veer's pain would not matter at all?? If a murderer kills 100 people and another murderer kills only 10 people, then obviously we will say that the first murderer is worse. But does that mean that second murderer's crimes don't matter at all? He might have killed only 10 people, but that is still a heinous crime.

Similarly, Veer's pain will not be as much as Mauli's, sure, but he'll still have pain. And Mishti would still be wrong.

Cheating is wrong no matter whether you're married or not. The act is still wrong. The pain might be worse in marriage, but that does not mean that before marriage there is no pain at all.

You cannot say that cheating does not matter if you're not married. The act of cheating is the same before or after marriage. Playing with someone's feelings is wrong even before marriage.

Pretending to be in love with someone and then going around with someone else is a very very wrong act. Being unmarried does not lessen the unethicality of the act.

Try to understand, here we're only talking about ETHICS and not the IMPACT.
Edited by krystal_watz - 6 years ago
jhalak7 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: krystal_watz



Doesn't matter if I'm married or not. We're talking about morals here. If I'm in a relationship with someone and cheat on them, then I'm committing an immoral act.
A marriage is first and foremost between the couple, and then everyone else. Everyone else and society is secondary. If the person I love cheats on me, then I'll be devastated. That devastation will not become unimportant just because I'm not married to that person.You need to understand that marriage is nothing but a social and legal certificate. Two people who are in a live-in relation also have an equally valid bond as two people who are married.
The pain of heartbreak does not reduce just because I did not yet sign the contract of marriage. Saying that cheating is okay if you're not married is an insult to all non-marital romantic relationships. Don't be so narrow in your thinking.


This thread is not about "cheating" in all sorts of relationship.
I have metioned earlier most probably you didn't read...Cheating is wrong in all relationship.

This thread is about Mauli and Veer's comparison. the title is "Veer is Mauli season 2". Which I object. Veer can't be Mauli. He is not married, never pregnant or had a child and seven year+six year relationship etc.
Stay inside the main plot "Silsila..." and the main topic of this thread." Veer
Mauli's season 2".,

Edited by jhalak7 - 6 years ago
ritzbitz786 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: -poloenigma-

I don't know why but I have a feeling that Veer will have his heart broken. I already like him based on the scenes he had with Mishti. He does love her.

I guess I'm the only one rooting for Mishti and Veer.

Please CVs, don't make Mishti another Kunal🤢🤢



I'm rooting for them too!
ritzbitz786 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

This is the prime reason why I don't want to get involved this season. 😆 . Promo was clear what the plot would be. I want to remember Mishti as Mauli and Ishaan's precious daughter. And not some one who became like Deewana doctor. Just like Mauli had no POV in the promo's of Silsila , Veer is not part of the montage. He is a secondary character for the writers like Mauli was initially. Only difference is in season 1 Kunal and Mauli were married and in love and now Mishti and Veer are engaged and not in love. So writers think may be now they can justify cheating. 😆 . I really hope they don't destroy Mishti's character.



It's so funny and sad because the cast and their interviews, they keep saying it's different from last Season.

Same thing happened with Shakti and DD, they were narrated one thing and another happened.

I guarantee you, Gajra and Pearl have not learned their lesson, they will repeat the same mistakes, viewership will be low, actors will quit and show will be cancelled.

It just baffles me, how Gajra and Pearl truly don't learn their lesson. How do you constantly make the same mistake over and over?!? It's like putting your hand on a burning stove again and again. At this point, they deserve to get burned.
ritzbitz786 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

no i dont think so mishti came across more sorted and balanced then her bio father plus she knows and understand the kind of pain that her mother endured so i dont think she will ever put veer through the same pain

silsila was originally about complex humzan emotions gajra messed it up first time around so maybe she will tell the story in a more mature way this time around plus as it is a web series so no trp race channel interference

and all the actors have stated in their intv that there will be no cheating this time



I used to think Gajra learned her lesson, but what she did with the end of S1, with a rushed ending, sailing both ships til the end, and the horrible execution of the ending (it was Happy we know, but still horribly executed), makes me think she hasn't learned her lesson at all.
ritzbitz786 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#39
Also, I think Ruhaan is a lead, but he serves as the prime example of fatal attraction.

I actually think neither of the girls will end up with him.

He will just be a representation of temptation, and they will perhaps falls for him and be tempted, there will be drama.

But at the end I think it will be Pari and Arnav and Mishti and Veer.
Mystique.Kishi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: Mages

furthermore this story has no EMA in it...its based on commitment v/s love...what should the girls choose...if mishti realise she doesn't love veer...she can cancel her wedding...so she is cheating noone if she falls in love with ruhaan...none of the girls are married...s1 ema is the concept but s2 is based on commitment n love...so one cannot compare the situations with nandini n kunal..mauli...kunan was purely EMA n cheating...mishti is not going through that phase...she can make decisions n firm with it...here no one is cheating no one...they are confused youngsters who needs to make decisions n see the difference b/w love n commitment...what they want love that makes their soul happy or commitment that they need to adjust..compromise n pretend to be happy..choices are in their hands...

mishti is just stuck b/w commitment n love and she needs to make a choice..what she wants in her life...ruhaan who is her love who makes her happy or veer who is her commitment and loves her,she cannot break his heart and just adjust with the situation n compromise with it

First and foremost I understand that some people think of marriage as this sacred thing. But commitment is commitment and marriage is nothing but a commitment. You are saying ki it is wrong to cheat in a marriage but boyfriend hai to cheating chalta hai ? No. Absolutely not. Breaking someone trust is not a joke be it in a marriage or a relationship. He is her fiancee and if she must fall for ruhaan I want her to break up with veer first. None of that chori chupke shxt. That si disgusting.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".