mouli and ishaan in live in relationship?? - Page 4

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

No it doesn't. Many couples are in an open relationship and even hold orgies at their farmhouses. If consenting adults are involved, then it's perfectly fine.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

It may be 'yuck' to most people, but some love it. I personally wouldn't indulge in it, but won't judge someone who does. It's their choice.

As long as it doesn't hurt anyone, it's fine.

Originally posted by: Luna46

Don't care about these people. They are living in medieval age.

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

People love BDSM and variety in sex, just like people are in open relationships. As long as it is between consenting partners/adults and not hurting anyone mentally, emotionally and physically. What on earth is the problem with that? I am totally against force against anyone in such things but I am no one to judge if their is actual consent involved.

EMA is wrong here because these two went behind the wife's back and did not have audacity to tell her the truth. Cheating is wrong because there is absence of consent while open relationships have consent of both partners involved.

Just like how rape is gross because it lacks consent and consensual sex act is not.

Mauli-Ishaan are living together with consent and not forcefully, their families know and they are not doing anything illegal, it's not any sort of civil or criminal offence as per Indian laws (adultery is still a civil offence). It's not like their living together is hurting anyone in this context on any level. Even the oldies are fine here.

If live-in isn't progressive, then it is not regressive either. Marriage can fail all the time just like live-ins can fail too. Marriage certainly is not guarantee of a successful relationship for life.

Wife swapping is between the couples. If there is consent, outside judgement doesn't matter. If there is no consent, then it comes under criminal offence. Indian laws don't even punish sexual act between consenting adults even when it is frowned upon and is rejected.

Accepting certain things or rejecting them don't make people progressive or regressive all the time. There was a time when relationship before marriage was a huge taboo and so frowned upon and now society has come to accept that. Girls wearing jeans were demonized, girls with opinions and a voice were shamed. And back then people used to mock that too on the same lines. Even divorce has beena taboo here for a long time, no matter how terrible marriage would have been.

And homosexuality and LGBT is not about progressive, it is about including and accepting people with differences in the mainstream society. They are not harming heterosexuals with their act since heterosexuals are always going to be in the majority.

People don't want to get married or have babies due to various reasons, is it progressive or regressive, NO, it's about accepting people's choices about their life rather than forcing things on them against their wish and it's fine as long as no one is getting hurt in this process for the life time. Evrything is in grey area, even the concept of regressive and progressive in the society.

I may not do a lot of things here- agree to pre-marital sex or short-term time ass relationships or even One nigh stands and a lot of other things but I will hate to be judged for that on these lines just like how they too will hate to be judged.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

It may be 'yuck' to most people, but some love it. I personally wouldn't indulge in it, but won't judge someone who does. It's their choice.

As long as it doesn't hurt anyone, it's fine.

Originally posted by: chirpyhapibird

swapping partners and threesome ...means really.Means anything in the name of being progressive.Kuch bhi haa.They are just perverts.