DD as vamp....

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Basilisk

@Basilisk

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#11

I have been watching Silsila on and off and honestly, at this point it would be a saving grace for this show and the actors to transform Nandini into a psycho vamp. Much better than this weak, bipolar and repulsive character.

I've been a DD fan since Geet days and I'm extremely unhappy with DD's association with this pathetic show. Don't know what's happened to DD's script sense. DMG, Geet and Madhubala became a phenomenon back in the good old days but the less said about her recent script sense the better.

I would rather the CVs turn Nandini's character into a proper antagonist or just shut down the show. I can't believe I'm saying this but even Ekta Maiyya's shows are better than this infidelity shit. Hopefully, DD can make a comeback with a better show whenever this one shuts shop.

Quote

PD_forums

@PD_forums

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 6 years ago

#12

DD is already playing vamp in the show.. just CVS need to make it official that's all.. Nandini character is not less than vamp

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

bhavanasargam

@bhavanasargam

Inactive

Posted: 6 years ago

#13

I dont want to see DD as vamp but love to see her as extremely strong character who will think of herself first but yet do good things when she saw some one in need intriguing audience to understand the complex character of Nandini. That will be good direction for the show to move on.

Quote

Lola

@Lola13

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#14

If they turn Nandini into a vamp it will justify Rajdeep's abuse! W*F! Are they going to make joke of abuse, rape, etc?

Quote

REST EASY PERRY

@Beautyful_Mess

Trailblazer

+ 8

Posted: 6 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: Lola13
If they turn Nandini into a vamp it will justify Rajdeep's abuse! W*F! Are they going to make joke of abuse, rape, etc?

Why would it justify Rajdeep's action?? Actually they can use that to justify N turning negative. Probably the affect of the physical/mental abuse made her mental kinda thing and I'm all for it.

Quote

Lola

@Lola13

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Beautyful_Mess
Why would it justify Rajdeep's action?? Actually they can use that to justify N turning negative. Probably the affect of the physical/mental abuse made her mental kinda thing and I'm all for it.

Turn a abuse rape victim into a negative character.. For me this is very dangerous thinking. Instead of showing what an actual abuse victim should do (get professional help) they will make her take revenge? (that's how I understood the spoiler)

The makers are sooo scared of the glorify EMA comments (which I still don't understand) that they will end up glorifying rape and abuse?

Quote

Saazhumsafars

@Saazhumsafars

Explorer

Posted: 6 years ago

#17

I don't think it's as if DD has done only crying or bechaari role in all her shows.What about her comedy as muskaan or geet?What about geet and madhubala standing up to her perpetrators?What about the protected,sheltered,used-to-having-things-her-own-way gayatri?

Due to these reasons, I had found that post praising jennifer winget by putting drashti down on bepannaah forum unfair too as the TM remembered 5-10 cute/lighthearted/slightly comic scenes JW did as zoya but did not remember DD's comedy as geet or muskaan and kept claiming that DD does only crying roles.Wow.

I don't like DD much as nandini and I miss the way she did her emotional scenes as madhubala and I agree that there is much more space for her to explore herself as an actress but most of that is web space in which DD does not seem to be interested.I think she is more interested in doing TV regardless of the satisfaction she would get as an actor.I could be wrong about this but this is the idea/vibe I get from her offscreen self and the fact that she chose something like PMHMD.

Edited by Saazhumsafars - 6 years ago

Quote

1 2

DD as vamp.... - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics