Why extreme reaction towards EMA only why not for Domestic Violence - Page 8

Originally posted by: WhyHate

I can answer for myself that I wasn't around. I honestly didn't start watching the show until about 3 weeks ago when I think Nandini first started considering leaving Mauli's house.

But I do condemn Rajdeep whenever he comes onscreen. That man is vile and pathetic and I have no problems saying as such.

But if you're going to ask me to create topic after topic on that, then I'm sorry but I can't. I would rather discuss the matters at hand. Rajdeep has been dealt with, now the topic of the show is the EMA and what should happen next and so I will discuss that. And no I won't just bash Nandini for it. In fact I'll bash Kunal for it more because he's the one who initiated it. He could have stepped back and said no and controlled himself, but he didn't in his stupid juzzbaat hain.

Originally posted by: 55sasa55

Stop questioning what people should do or not do. I'm sure you must have said this yourself in this very forum. So practice what you preach. If there is more hatred then it's their opinion based on what they see. Maybe these people came in because they connected more with Mauli's pain than Nandini's. Maybe the way Aditi has been nailing her scenes which make her Mauli more connected, they feel her hurt more and so pour hatred over the one who caused her hurt. That's the success of a capable artist I guess, can't blame people for it.

Originally posted by: sriam

I am appalled by the way society in our country thinks at present.. it shows from the reactions we have for the characters of the show. No wonder domestic abuse is on the rise since its not frowned upon as much as the moral police would frown upon an EMA. Just tell me one thing when a woman is physically, mentally, financially, emotionally and constantly abused by a man does she or does she not have a right to fall in love with another man or move on in life? Or does she have to stay with this man only? We all know that LOVE happens.. its not planned,

yes the two of them i.e. Kunal and Nandini should have moved away from each other before succumbing to their feelings, LOVE does not always mean sleeping with one another, they did not think about MAULI and IT WAS their fault. However every human being has the moral right to choose whom they want to live. If today Nandini and Kunal divorce their respective partners and get married their love wont be frowned upon I am sure. BUT RAJDEEP WAS IS AND WILL BE A CRIMINAL FOR ME.

I donot support EMA but at the same time I completely understand that people fall in love and have right to say NO to any kind of abuse, its their life they can choose whomever they want or not want to stay with

MAULI has been cheated and she as well has all the right to move on. EMA has its consequences as divorce and ABUSE has consequences as jail but in all this what RAJDEEP did was a CRIME.

Originally posted by: White..Magic

[

@bold

What is the definition of flawed according to you and TM?

Is it D*ckholic kunal who believes in mooh maaro everywhere and then call it Ruhani Aarzoo?

Or is it Menholic Nandini who is looking for abuser, rapist, cheater man as her life support?

Otherwise there's a difference between imperfect and abnormal.

Even someone wish to be in open marriage should find the partner with same belief. Out of blue kunal became pro open marriage and started one sided open marriage and people call it just flawed. 😆

Originally posted by: kala16

It's because of not calling spade a spade.

They glorified EMA as Pavitra rishta and Nandini happy after having sex with Kunal and not even an ounce of guilt and happily romancing infront of the family.

Saath mein aarati karna,baba Gyaan Dena all pissed off the audience

😆

Originally posted by: _charu_

Ruin somebody elses life for ruhani aarzoo for no fault of theirs , this complex emotion is flawed. Lol

Originally posted by: Beautyful_Mess

That's still not an excuse for people not reacting. So I don't get the whole it wasn't glorify angle. As a human being it should provoke same emotions as the EMA if not more. Like I said in another thread an excuse to why bash character for being morally wrong while members do the same thing. both are wrong one worse than the other.