What are makers thinking? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Devtaholic

I fail to understand what makers are trying to say? A women should never be independent, never be professionally successful, never take care your family despite being professionally busy, never help a friend in need and bring her home. What are they actually trying to say? Sit in home cook, decorate home, dress up beautifully be submissive and innocent. Like really?

I fail to understand Kunal he was genuinely in love with his wife. He adored her, respected her was proud about her. He was never insecure or jealous about his wife's success. During Nikhil Neha fiasco it Mauli who felt insecure, then it was Kunal who assured he never walk out from there marriage due the professional commitments. Not even once he had ever said he is upset with Mauli. Leave alone saying not even his thoughts never depicted he is upset in there marriage. Then all of a sudden he sees pretty face dancing in rain and he is in love with another women. Like really?

Even more pathetic neither Kunal nor Nandini has an ounce of shame or guilt for what they are doing in the name of love. On top of it they bring poor gods in between the affair as the gods want them together.

The actors have no consistency first they say it is not EMA and forum stated shouting it is not EMA because K has not given N a rose.
Now leave rose they have done everything only left is having sex in front of Mauli.
Now people are bashing the actors are saying do not watch writer is defending.
There is nothing left it should go off air.
In serial image of the character becomes very strong smriti Irana is a minister but still some where ther is a tulsi wish th actors all the best though Maya and Zoya got love but maya was loved

They know their plans backfired.

There was nothing wrong in wanting to do a show based on EMA. They could have portrayed it realistically and showed the consequences accordingly. But I guess the CVs were never confident with their concept, and hence those initial misleading statements about the show not being about EMA, and then trying use divine symbols, etc to justify this 'true love'. Trying to sugar-coat the EMA with divine symbolisms has probably caused backlash and now they are trying to back-track by saying 'immorality will not be promoted'... I don't know what that means but I hope they do away with their sugar-coating and show the negative consequences of the EMA.

EMA is a reality but no need to show it as a romance. TRP audience know people can fall out of love and be attracted to others but showing this as god's plan and trying to justify it is wrong. How about acknowledgement that what you are doing is a betrayal, how about guilt about not being able to stop hurting someone you care about and how about remorse for your actions. None of this is shown.

And can't the cvs differentiate between teenage love and love after marriage ? What will kunal get by hearing I love you from her and doing aarti and spoon feeding ? Both are adults , what ? 30+? Ye kya bachon wali harkatein hai? I'm sure their audience are adults , why show this horrible pukish romance ?