Content removed by author - Page 7

Originally posted by: -Lehar-

Oh is this called criticism comparing certain character with some one and body shaming new meaning for criticism I must say

Originally posted by: Angels11

I wish they had concentrated more on character building before jumping straight into EMA. In most other stories even though EMA is wrong the viewers are able to at least understand the reasoning behind the actions of those involved. Here none of what Kunal & Nandini r dng makes sense. I ve friends who ve fallen in love (no EMA of course 😆). The initial phase is slow. They r treading carefully, trying 2 understand each other. I ve seen their fights & their kiss & make up. There is a natural progression of events. Here everything is so rushed. I still cant c what made Kunal fall in love. I can understand the attraction. Nandini is a v beautiful woman, more traditional & submissive, brings out his protective instincts. But r these enuf to make a man fall out of love with his attractive, loving wife & fall in love with Nandini I dont think so. Again if he is a weak guy like Abhinav who is kinda lusty then i can understand. But all this while they showed Kunal as a decent guy & then suddenly BHAM he is in love with his wife's friend, its just so silly. Again if its pure lust i can understand. Like the character of Imran Hashmi in Zeher or John Abraham in Jism. But here they r showing it to be love. That's wat is confusing the viewers. Nandini tho I ve completely given up. Her character never made sense to me frm the beginning 😕 Just coming out of sustained abuse for 7 yrs how does she fall in love with a guy so soon. Ppl in her situation ll b wary of men & their advances. In fact I ve know friends who were in a I HATE MEN phase. And here in just a few weeks she is romancing her friend's husband. Yeh kya logic hai yaar

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

LOL, so characters should not be criticised? Just shut down the forum then.

And the TM NEVER said anything about the actors, only the characters.

Originally posted by: -Lehar-

Why to waste it time here just pm the screen shot to global mod they will take the action and u come out from this thread ...I have already pmed mod actual post let them take action

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

TM: I have read your original post, there was nothing objectionable in it. Carry on. 👍🏼

Originally posted by: Snow_Angel

actually talking about someone's dress and calling her sabita bhabhi isn't s**t shaming...talking about Shakti's lip color isn't body shaming yeah I have to learn new definition from them...any way ok I leaving from here...rest let mods decide what is what and what not

Originally posted by: -Lehar-

Comparing character with sabita babhi is not objectionable wah wah ..

Originally posted by: Snow_Angel

don't pretend like u have no6 read her post before editing it ...Lol...Don't even give me lecture about DD ...I don't need to know about her at least from you who support her basher

Originally posted by: -Lehar-

Comparing character with sabita babhi is not objectionable wah wah ..

Originally posted by: -Lehar-

And some people encouraging Tm ...Kya baat hain daag deni padegi