'Intolerance to luv'was a waste of time Amir. - Page 13

Originally posted by: znursingh

@ GoAwayManeet


STOP SPAMMING!!
STOP ADVERTISING YOUR "WRITINGS"!!!!

START USING-1) A DICTIONARY
2) A GOOD BOOK OF GRAMMAR
3) COMMON SENSE
4) BRAIN
5) MUTE BUTTON ON SPEECH
6) STOP BUTTON ON POSTING

THANK YOU!!YOUR CO-OPERATION WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Originally posted by: znursingh

@ GoAwayManeet


STOP SPAMMING!!
STOP ADVERTISING YOUR "WRITINGS"!!!!

START USING-1) A DICTIONARY
2) A GOOD BOOK OF GRAMMAR
3) COMMON SENSE
4) BRAIN
5) MUTE BUTTON ON SPEECH
6) STOP BUTTON ON POSTING

THANK YOU!!YOUR CO-OPERATION WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Oh my god

@TM - I still dont understand why links to your previous topics in other forums are of concern here in this forum, they are not related to this topic. On one hand you are asking people to concentrate on what you are trying to say here and on the other hand you ask readers to forget the arguement and read ur other topics written in other forums. From your posts it is clear that you yourself are not clear about the points you are raising. You want rights to be given to parents by the government so they can be sure their kid wont convert after a inter religion marraige thus making them agree to it and hence they wont be motivated to honour killing. How do you acheive that I dont understand. Who will give rights to young adults who are by law eligible to marry that they will not be harmed by the same parents even after they agree. Are you saying an individual does not have a right to choose his/ her life and relgion after reaching a certain age. Well I cannot agrue with you on this because just like how you think eveyone else is not getting your pov you are not ready to look from other point of view. but out of curiousity I ask how do you actually expect the rights of parents to be implemented. There will be a survey? to whom is it given, to parents by birth?, how about if there are only gaurdians? how about it there are step parents who dont care that much what the step child does, how do you protect the sons and daughters here. I just dont see how giving more rights to parents assuring that their children have no right to change their religion help in a developing society. You are saying not to link religion to parent's right but that is exactly why you are asking that govt should give rights to parents. why am I even replying 😔

Originally posted by: kavyasam

@TM - I still dont understand why links to your previous topics in other forums are of concern here in this forum, they are not related to this topic. On one hand you are asking people to concentrate on what you are trying to say here and on the other hand you ask readers to forget the arguement and read ur other topics written in other forums. From your posts it is clear that you yourself are not clear about the points you are raising. You want rights to be given to parents by the government so they can be sure their kid wont convert after a inter religion marraige thus making them agree to it and hence they wont be motivated to honour killing. How do you acheive that I dont understand. Who will give rights to young adults who are by law eligible to marry that they will not be harmed by the same parents even after they agree. Are you saying an individual does not have a right to choose his/ her life and relgion after reaching a certain age. Well I cannot agrue with you on this because just like how you think eveyone else is not getting your pov you are not ready to look from other point of view. but out of curiousity I ask how do you actually expect the rights of parents to be implemented. There will be a survey? to whom is it given, to parents by birth?, how about if there are only gaurdians? how about it there are step parents who dont care that much what the step child does, how do you protect the sons and daughters here. I just dont see how giving more rights to parents assuring that their children have no right to change their religion help in a developing society. You are saying not to link religion to parent's right but that is exactly why you are asking that govt should give rights to parents. why am I even replying 😔

Originally posted by: bewafa

Because you are an optimist. Maybe THIS will be the post that will enable some orthodox people to you know...open their minds 😉

Originally posted by: kavyasam

there is nothing wrong in being orthodox and having different opinion , but to have government give rights to protect that, that is ridiculous expectation.

Originally posted by: ComebackMaaneet

Well dear it is the constitution which gives rights to children to marry anyone without parents consent and it is the constitution which will protect rights of the parents in this matter.

Government and political parties make constitution hence all the expectations are from government.

Above all India is democratic nation...people elected government is supposed to make changes to law...

Now if you do not have this much knowledge then you do not have right to comment my demand is a ridiculous expectation..either you have no hope from government then I can understand and I support your feedback and point it will be a ridiculous expectation..

If you have just mentioned for the sake of bashing me then bash me with some logic in your replies...

Love you all for participating and commenting..

Regards,

Vikrant Khatri

Originally posted by: bewafa

@kavyasam

Of course there is nothing wrong with having a different opinion, and being orthodox. The problem is when orthodox people refuse to even see another point of view.

@ComebackMaaneet

Dude, I'm doing my further studies in public policy and all things government related and all that, and what you're suggesting is sooo childish...that it pains me to even read.

I believe the constitution protects the right of the children to marry who they please because it is the right of the individual. Parents can have an influence on who their child marries through the child's upbringing. However, once the child becomes an adult and chooses to marry his/her partner, the parents can use conversation to influence their child's decision. They should not use force/abuse/killings to prevent the marriage. Why should the government get involved in the parent's right to influence their child regarding marriage?