01/16 Mausiji as krishna

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#21

@Znursingh: You're not just abrasive and display a foul temper, but are IMMENSELY ignorant. Pedophilia is when there is an ACTUAL relationship between a minor and an adult. A minor ENACTING the role of an adult woman in a relationship with another adult, is not pedophilia by any stretch. There is no ACTUAL ROMANCE involved here. Not just are your accusations technically unfounded, but also extremely dangerous. Do you realize that you're actually trivialising the topic of pedophilia and the people victimised by that scourge? JUST BECAUSE you find it personally uncomfortable to watch, doesn't grant you the right to fling ignorant remarks around.

Quote

567043

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
@Znursingh: You're not just abrasive and display a foul temper, but are IMMENSELY ignorant. Pedophilia is when there is an ACTUAL relationship between a minor and an adult. A minor ENACTING the role of an adult woman in a relationship with another adult, is not pedophilia by any stretch. There is no ACTUAL ROMANCE involved here. Not just are your accusations technically unfounded, but also extremely dangerous. Do you realize that you're actually trivialising the topic of pedophilia and the people victimised by that scourge? JUST BECAUSE you find it personally uncomfortable to watch, doesn't grant you the right to fling ignorant remarks around.

OH PLEASE GET A LIFE AND GET REAL!!

I said some thing adverse about your favorite jodi so I'm abrasive?

I MIRRORED another poster's language to show her how awful and inappropriate her language was for discourse on a public fora and I become foul tempered in your PUNY opinion? Get an immediate refund of your school fees-they failed to teach you even the basics of logic!

As for your RIDICULOUS charge that I am trivializing an issue as sensitive as pedophilia-that is just as plain moronic as would be a charge that you are accepting or encouraging it by endorsing the Roli-Sid "romance".Would you like to get out of the fanbot mode and question why Ms Gor is considered too young to thread her mono eyebrow but not considered too young to play the simpering wife? Objectifying a girl-child in the most obnoxious manner.

I TEACH Eng & Law at DU and I'm a practicing lawyer for Child Rights at the Supreme Court so I'm really NOT about to take advise from a preteen fanbot on pedophilia-I've dealt with too many heart-breaking cases to take cretinous fans of an inappropriate relationship with any seriousness.

I am done talking to the likes of you.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: znursingh

OH PLEASE GET A LIFE AND GET REAL!!
I said some thing adverse about your favorite jodi so I'm abrasive?
I MIRRORED another poster's language to show her how awful and inappropriate her language was for discourse on a public fora and I become foul tempered in your PUNY opinion? Get an immediate refund of your school fees-theyfailedto teach you eventhe basics of logic!


As for your RIDICULOUS charge that I am trivializing an issue as sensitive aspedophilia-that is just as plain moronic as would be a charge that you are accepting or encouraging it by endorsing the Roli-Sid "romance".Would you like to get out of the fanbot mode and question why Ms Gor is considered too young to thread her mono eyebrow but not considered too young to play the simpering wife? Objectifying a girl-child in the mostobnoxiousmanner.


I TEACH Eng & Law at DU and I'm a practicing lawyer for Child Rights at the Supreme Court so I'm really NOT about to take advise from a preteen fanbot onpedophilia-I've dealt with too many heart-breaking cases to take cretinous fans of an inappropriate relationship with anyseriousness.


I am done talking to the likes of you.

Thanks for basically confirming everything I said. You're not just uncivil, but also are incapable of holding a mature debate. Telling somebody to "get a life" and calling them "cretinous" are called "personal attacks", which are dis-allowed per the rules of this forum. And honey, for your gracious knowledge, I'm neither a teen, preteen NOR a regular viewer of the show. You need to desperately pop some BP pills. And pray, how is Avika being "objectified" by portraying a wife? You, a Professor of Law and Science, AND A LAWYER AT THE S.C.? Who talks like a bratty thirteen-year old on her period? Please hand over whatever you're smoking. I feel sorry for you. You're either a child or senile. I can't tell which.

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#24

And you also need to improve your comprehensiblity, which I doubt your below-average IQ would allow you to. Avika is ENACTING a role, not LIVING IT. You claim to be an S. C. Lawyer of child rights, and yet have absolutely ZERO qualms about equating an onscreen pair with PEDOPHILIA?? Do you even realize the irony of your claims? And you expect people to buy them? Last but not the least, you get extremely personal, talk in a ridiculously immature and juvenile manner, and don't even realize it when people point it out. Seriously, who/what conditions do you live with/under? You seem to be pretty miserable in life. How about you ACTUALLY get a job and a life that YOU desperately need, and not others?

Quote

567043

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

When I say I'm done talking to cretins I really AM- though it is IMMENSELY gratifying to watch a cretinous fanbot hop about gracelessly with both feet gymnastically and determinedly stuffed in her mouth!!The body of your post is not worth my time!

CHEERS!

1.Buy your own smokes-cadging is a bad habit!

2,Who cares if you are "regular" or not?Why would it be of even PASSING interest to anyone?

3.Child or Senile? Whichever! Takes one to recognize your own kind!!

4.You are having your periods???? I'm disqualified by YOU on grounds of age!! Too young/old!

Edited by znursingh - 12 years ago

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: znursingh

Thanks for basically confirming everything I said. You're not just uncivil, but also are incapable of holding a mature debate. Telling somebody to "get a life" and calling them "cretinous" are called "personal attacks", which are dis-allowed per the rules of this forum. And honey, for your gracious knowledge, I'm neither a teen, preteen NOR a regular viewer of the show. You need to desperately pop some BP pills. And pray, how is Avika being "objectified" by portraying a wife? You, a Professor of Law and Science, AND A LAWYER AT THE S.C.? Who talks like a bratty thirteen-year old on her period? Please hand over whatever you're smoking. I feel sorry for you. You're either a child or senile. I can't tell which.

When I say I'm done talking to cretins I really AM- though it isIMMENSELYgratifying to watch a cretinous fanbot hop about gracelessly with both feetgymnastically and determinedly stuffedin her mouth!!The body of your post is not worth my time!

CHEERS!

@UNDERLINED: Irony is so thick, I can barely breathe. 🤣

Edited by krystal_watz - 12 years ago

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: znursingh

Thanks for basically confirming everything I said. You're not just uncivil, but also are incapable of holding a mature debate. Telling somebody to "get a life" and calling them "cretinous" are called "personal attacks", which are dis-allowed per the rules of this forum. And honey, for your gracious knowledge, I'm neither a teen, preteen NOR a regular viewer of the show. You need to desperately pop some BP pills. And pray, how is Avika being "objectified" by portraying a wife? You, a Professor of Law and Science, AND A LAWYER AT THE S.C.? Who talks like a bratty thirteen-year old on her period? Please hand over whatever you're smoking. I feel sorry for you. You're either a child or senile. I can't tell which.

When I say I'm done talking to cretins I really AM- though it isIMMENSELYgratifying to watch a cretinous fanbot hop about gracelessly with both feetgymnastically and determinedly stuffedin her mouth!!The body of your post is not worth my time!

CHEERS!

1.Buy your ownsmokes-cadging is a bad habit!

2,Who cares if you are "regular" or not?Why would it be of even PASSING interest to anyone?

3.Child or Senile? Whichever! Takes one to recognize your own kind!!

4.You are having your periods???? I'm disqualified by YOU on grounds of age!! Too young/old!

Apparently, you're illeterate as well. I cited my viewership status since you so graciously called me a "fanbot". And this was your most inebriated post so far. I tried to make sense of the lines above, but couldn't. What exactly are you trying to retort to? Its all jumbled up.

Edited by krystal_watz - 12 years ago

Quote

Rich`

@cs-07

Dazzler

Posted: 12 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: znursingh

Cant argue with fans! So I wont even try-you guys go ahead!
BTW=Two wrongs NEVER made a right-so even if a woman in her twenties is playing mother to other twenty year olds,THAT wont justify pedophilia-just my two cents!!

As far as the CHARACTERS of Roli & Simran=both sister are just plain stupid-Simran was advised by an IDIOT bhua for her dance competition and now Roli is taking advice from a mean spirited Mausi!!Neither use the brain they were presumably BORN with! To try and benefit the family is all very nobel-but hide facts from them like this is stupid AND suicidal!

simar has been a moron from the time the show started

going to the competition and making her sister the bali ka bakra .. she was fully aware of te consequences, the worst thing is she didnt get punished for it.. not at all!

about the characters and actors, avika is a minor and what is being depicted in the show however fictional, is not acceptable. for the audience or the actress herself.. and the parents are definitely to be blamed for that.

Quote

Rich`

@cs-07

Dazzler

Posted: 12 years ago

#29

Also Krystalwatz if someone knows more or doesnt agree with the majority's views, it doesnt make them disruptive or being there just to create a horrible environment which you have done quite successfully now.

Avika is a child and she is potraying a woman in a fictional show , yes but that doesnt eliminate the point of a minor being exploited by the parents and the television honchos.