JitenLalwani's(InderKashyap)Message4u:)

ooohhh... he visits IF! wow... thats great!

One Q. How to do this ? Really , I have no idea How can I can give him better ratings . 😳

FAQ: How this ranking points are computed?

Please note that the numbers in the table above are presented in points after calculating them in relative terms compared to other celebrities so don't be confused on how it says Fans to be 350 (thats the maximum weightage) when they have more or less. So for example if Karan Singh Grover has maximum number of fans at 2463 so that is considered as the maximum weightage Point 350 (considered 100%) and from there we start calculating other celebrities like Harshad Chopra has 1638 fans and so it gets 149 Points (which happens to be near 70% of Karan Singh Grover).

Similarly if Shilpa Anand got the maximum number of views and our max weightage point is 225 and if Harshad gets 56 points for views then it means that Harshad is getting almost 25% views of what Shilpa Anand got.

Same thing goes with Comments and other parameters. From time to time we would be optimizing our weightage system and will add more parameters to make this ranking system more better. We are even working on a way to add Show TRP points also as one of the various parameters in determining the popularity of the actor for the week.

What a superbly confusing ranking system. 😕

Thanks for sharing Shikhu...!! N yep he is a great actor...!! <3

YEAH HE IS AN AWESOME ACTOR

Sorry but I am not happy or convinced with this rating system... I guess we need to improve this...

First of all we should not have relative ratings because all the actors are not of the same age group...this means that they would be appreciated by by people/fans of different age groups.. With this rating system veteran actors like Suptiya ji, Sudhir ji will never come even in top 100.

Originally posted by: starry.phoenix

FAQ: How this ranking points are computed?

Please note that the numbers in the table above are presented in points after calculating them in relative terms compared to other celebrities so don't be confused on how it says Fans to be 350 (thats the maximum weightage) when they have more or less. So for example if Karan Singh Grover has maximum number of fans at 2463 so that is considered as the maximum weightage Point 350 (considered 100%) and from there we start calculating other celebrities like Harshad Chopra has 1638 fans and so it gets 149 Points (which happens to be near 70% of Karan Singh Grover).

Similarly if Shilpa Anand got the maximum number of views and our max weightage point is 225 and if Harshad gets 56 points for views then it means that Harshad is getting almost 25% views of what Shilpa Anand got.

Same thing goes with Comments and other parameters. From time to time we would be optimizing our weightage system and will add more parameters to make this ranking system more better. We are even working on a way to add Show TRP points also as one of the various parameters in determining the popularity of the actor for the week.

I seriously respect the hard work u all guys put in maintaining this site, but I guess the ranking system in not very convincing. Taking a case, right now in the list of top 10 rated actors, there are 3 actors who are not active for a long time i.e. they are not working in any of the shows or reality shows. Still they are there in the top10.. I find it very justifiable.

Taking the example of cricket, the rankings are based on the current performances...Similarly we should rate actors not on their past performances but current.

ohh...He is a brilliant actor...