Hypothesis-how Q is affecting SC - Page 9

Thanks mandygill and green_tea 😳 Btw, mandygill, the name is IdiotViewer... I assure you I do not love idiots 😆

Hello Miss Topic maker Can I hug you.🤗.for writing this STUPENDOUS POST so Detailed that I am gassping in wondering how on earth you found patience to pen it down..And I am with you in every word you have written..!! EVERY WORD..and a special TEDDY HUG to GOUTAM RHODE..for being the MAN he is & a FANTABULOUS ACTOR too🤗.!! ..Ohh its high time everyone get professional please..!!

SC is the best show !

Originally posted by: SC_wellwisher

Hi Mandygill

Wow, it's hilarious to read your statement - touch me not and techno romance.

totally agree with mandy gill and idiot viewer. i didn't realise that mrs touch-me-not had a clause...but now it makes sense! no surprises really...considering the invisible/censored SR and the attitude and statements given off screen...but what surprises me is that how could SLB sign someone with such nakhras, as recently there was some fuss over kareena losing out on SLB'S next movie as he wanted an unmarried actress for the role...so i thought he would have applied the same rule here, especially as it' s meant to be a romantic show which requires romantic scenes (which requires an actress who is both professional and comfortable enough to deal with them)...and it's also a daily soap which requires regular off-screen interaction too (e.g interviews, SBS stuff, tours, award/live show participation, SP events, etc). if you're gonna shun your co-star off-screen or refuse to interact with him, then it spoils the image of the show and the credibility of the jodi (not to mention of course your own professional reputation). and as you said above, no romance, no show...people seem to buy into the romance more when the leads have a good/comfortable off-screen equation. i'm already put off by this kinda behaviour and attitude and finding it increasingly difficult to invest myself in the show...it's like i'm watching someone being forced to do something which kinda puts me off 😕 i remember there were some members here who expressed their reservations about the casting of a married actress at the start of the show, and i must say that they had a point. in between all these clauses and restrictions let's hope the soul of the show (romance) does not get suffocated and die... 😔

your latest update is even funnier than your previous post.newbie,right?

Originally posted by: anoo67

your latest update is even funnier than your previous post.newbie,right?

Originally posted by: green_tea

totally agree with mandy gill and idiot viewer. i didn't realise that mrs touch-me-not had a clause...but now it makes sense! no surprises really...considering the invisible/censored SR and the attitude and statements given off screen...but what surprises me is that how could SLB sign someone with such nakhras, as recently there was some fuss over kareena losing out on SLB'S next movie as he wanted an unmarried actress for the role...so i thought he would have applied the same rule here, especially as it' s meant to be a romantic show which requires romantic scenes (which requires an actress who is both professional and comfortable enough to deal with them)...and it's also a daily soap which requires regular off-screen interaction too (e.g interviews, SBS stuff, tours, award/live show participation, SP events, etc). if you're gonna shun your co-star off-screen or refuse to interact with him, then it spoils the image of the show and the credibility of the jodi (not to mention of course your own professional reputation). and as you said above, no romance, no show...people seem to buy into the romance more when the leads have a good/comfortable off-screen equation. i'm already put off by this kinda behaviour and attitude and finding it increasingly difficult to invest myself in the show...it's like i'm watching someone being forced to do something which kinda puts me off 😕 i remember there were some members here who expressed their reservations about the casting of a married actress at the start of the show, and i must say that they had a point. in between all these clauses and restrictions let's hope the soul of the show (romance) does not get suffocated and die... 😔

green tea, agree, it was me only who objected why a married woman for a romantic show..and the results of destruction are now in front of u..felt sorry for gautam who was dancing all alone among the other jodis of star plus..i would call that the height un professional attitude😡

Originally posted by: TOTAL-ROMANTIC

Hello Miss Topic maker Can I hug you.🤗.for writing this STUPENDOUS POST so Detailed that I am gassping in wondering how on earth you found patience to pen it down..And I am with you in every word you have written..!! EVERY WORD..and a special TEDDY HUG to GOUTAM RHODE..for being the MAN he is & a FANTABULOUS ACTOR too🤗.!! ..Ohh its high time everyone get professional please..!!

^That is the most sexist comment especially coming from a girl. A married woman shouldn't do a romantic show?

Originally posted by: *Reemz*

^That is the most sexist comment especially coming from a girl. A married woman shouldn't do a romantic show?

I am seriously questioning Mandy if you like the show at all :/ Because you only have negative things to day.

i like the show and gautam, jennifer no doubt is a good actress, but her negative off screen stuff keeps reminding me that she is married..that she is not interested in the show..that she just wants to get the work done and go home to her hubby..that she feels uncomfortable doing any touch waala scene with gauti because the hubby does not like it..aisa lag raha hai wo serial ko haan karke fus gayee hai..now that makes me hard to connect with samud as a jodi..and i cud sense all this from the very first day of her attitude..didn't u wanted to see their dance together like other jodis on star plus?..she cud not even do that because hubby will not like it..now answer that please!