Originally posted by: smrth
Hotdogg, Whoever gave you this informations on Kumud is spot on. The character is constantly degraded and demeaned in her marital life. The onus was on two men in her life. First SC, who flee away literally in mid of night, despite explicit warning ( by his wise friend) about huge injustice to his beloved fiancee and a calamity that would befall her. By this time, love was full bloomed. They had fallen head over heel for each other during his first visit to RN after the engagement. This, he disregards in a fit of renouncing the world over a fight with his father ( instigated by Gumaan and her brother). And then SC sends her 'a withdrawal/ rejection' letter (it was then), telling her to get married elsewhere! (Actually a beautiful poem, " priya ramya vibhavari.."🤢)...What followed was a 'life time' guilt trip for the 'Hero'...In disguise as Navinchandra, He witnesses even her ruinous degradation by hands of her philanderer husband. Her abject disintegration...Previously VC had got panicked ( broken engagement was a serious social stigma then) and hurriedly married her to a complete mismatch...aim of recounting this sequence here is twofold; 1) which audience wud like to watch such failures by two supposedly sound characters and boost TRPs? 2) which kind of deification/'bitter sweet' pain wud now be attributed to such failed relations? 😕
In fact we already saw two huge deviations from the story line, to make Hero palatable and to remove some wimpy feet from the him. They have introduced 'insecurity fed' superstition accruing from mother's suicide and Dukhbaa- LN tiff. None of these exist in Novel. Chandra Laxmi (not 'Saraswati') died natural death. SC has no superstition. And Dukhbaa never even knew LN or SC. A much minor character (for two three pages), she was long gone before SC even visited RN first time...I have no objection to such improvisations. SC in the serial is much more attractive and rationalised. But, if such 'deviations' from the original is not affecting the 'essence' of the original, then why would a most imperative correction in the 'end' do?...
Add to this, even more horrifying reason that has been advanced to settle him with Kusum, or rather not writing him down with Kumud. Let me tell you there is no 'bitter sweet' epiphany in there. There was pure orthodoxy, even more unreasonable in writing a hero, originally responsible for the ruin, accepting a substitute sister while heroine was almost ready (she was in her first take, before 'recomposing' herself for nun-hood) to realign her life with him! Author's one track 'sanatan Brahmin' mind was set on this, " Hindu aryanari once married, never takes second husband'! Never mind that dead philanderer husband had multiple affairs. Or a 'pure' hero can accept another sister! The 'epic' indeed!🤢