Originally posted by: *Reemz*
That's true they didn't seem to focus on the physical closeness which occurred before the verbal acceptance but then again they got past the 'touching of the waist' too but at that time Saras just said sorry. However, this time he admitted there is something more to their relationship which kind of shook both of them. After this tug of war, one finally clearly said that they could have something more.
I wouldn't call Saras' act a sacrifice, I'd more so call it his own insecurities and vulnerability which pulls him away. He doesn't know how to handle unconditional love...
That is the problem Reemz . As a viewer that's the problem for me. Not for the sake of arguments or contest, but for a better insight, how do you manage to condone practical fall outs? Let me outline the 'problem'.
For a start, I am not disputing his genuineness or sincerity. He does not mean harm to an ant. There is no want of physical or mental valour if it comes to help others. He is largely free of conceit.Intelligent, perceptive and keenly sensitive. In short a true gentleman in every sense.
Now regarding Kumud; a) He is already worshipping her ( admitted or not). He can not see a thorn or spark scratch her. Needs be, he would jump in to fire or deep waters if it secures her well-being. BUT b) he is indeed emotionally impaired. Vulnerable too. Insecure and unable to handle a true love. And because of b) he is messing on part a). To 'save' her from 'himself'!
But as viewer how would we not notice that how hopelessly he is pushing her over the precipice? How, in his very act to save her, he is sending her to a social, personal and emotional disaster? How inexorably she is being sent to a ruin and set back from where she would never recover through out? This part is not letting me condone his vulnerability. Would you analyse why or how it should? For once keeping aside tremendous act or presence of the actor, just from character's position point of view?
Edited by smrth - 12 years ago
