Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 25th August 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 25 Aug 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai August 26, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
ANSHUMAN GONE 25.8
A study On Miss Geetanjali Armaan Poddar
AFTER MATHh. 26.8
Deepika vs Katrina wars…World War 3 👀
IMDB's most beautiful actresses in the world. Kriti & Hania in top 10
Parineeti Chopra is pregnant
A Study on Miss Abhira "Jogan" Sharma
Anupamaa 25 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Navri - The Hawasi Mistress
Navri’s Love
Punishment to kill one or five is same
Maza nahi aaya😒
Who killed Anshuman; mara kaise ?
New Katrina and Hrithrik Roshan ad for Rado
Vicky Kaushal’s Mahavatar postponed to 2027
Who should cliff off
🇮🇳 Big News for IndiaForums Members! 🇮🇳
Vaishali,
You wrote everything I wanted to say. No matter how I admire GR's work, I can't help but notice a powerful tendency in the forum (and understandable, I am not complaining), which overlooks- tends to condone- some obvious lapses/ falters by the character SC, especially in his dealing with Kumud. Scriptwriters too are sometimes presenting convoluted logic/ twisting of their own previous scenes;
Two points stood out in his end speech today- (and let me tell you beforehand, on the whole I liked his confession immensely today, which is how it is in book too. He HAD accepted his love)-
- He says, " You called me". By now She too believes it so! We viewers are now also buying the same. But in THE Scene, cvs put up the 'challenge' as after taunt to a clear directive OTHERWISE. She had asked him to sort out his mess with father. There IN Dubai. The challenge was a 'taunt' for not doing this obvious job, (that he failed, or would be failing in convincing his father was his problem not hers), and not an 'invitation'. She was actually surprised at seeing him in RN. And even if challenge would be taken as a long scratched 'invitation' - by now scratched so by her too!- then it was more as a demand to tender apology to her father. In fact, he too was ranting the same jaap, ' I had come here only to apologize'. So now how does it become an 'invitation' by her?!
- Even more unsubstantial is his charge, "you didn't allow me to go." Now this I don't get at all. When?? In fact she not only didn't stop him before Yash Fiasco. She always pleaded him to go go go. Maybe I am missing something...
That the actor is doing a tremendous job. He is eye catching. He is the Lead. But all these should not alter objective facts about lapses of the character, I believe. No matter, how vulnerable his childhood was, or tragic his bind is, today his acts are directly and adversely affecting peace, reputation and prospect of a Girl and her entire family. Gumans and Sundars of the world are ready to pounce on them...But for his sheer honesty, his actions would almost be branded Casanova...he must publicly acknowledge the relationship. He must give due RESPECT to it...
Originally posted by: arshicritic
All this while I was reading all the other posts on this thread and all was said so beautifully, and I felt, nothing for me to add, except wow and wonderful.So here I found my opportunity to poke my nose in1. You called me :Lets not take it literally, she taunted him, dared him, he was intrigued and couldn't put her words ( and the nazuk Kamaria) out of his mind.Something in her challenge beckoned him and he landed upShe willed him to come, remember her saying to Kusum - woh aayegaSo underneath her taunt was a desire to get him here - tumne mujhe bina dekhe na kyon kaha?So she called him, and he came, and they both realize that2. You didn't let me goShe wouldn't show him her faceShe wouldn't let him speak to herShe let him know that her father would be devastated when he finds about the rishtaShe says go, but she intrigues him, attracts him, looks out for him, helps him, fights for himWhen he was leaving before the Yash fiasco, she was at the gate watching him, silently.I like to think that they were both talking about what was happening beyond the words, and beyond the sequence of events
Originally posted by: arshicritic
All this while I was reading all the other posts on this thread and all was said so beautifully, and I felt, nothing for me to add, except wow and wonderful.So here I found my opportunity to poke my nose in1. You called me :Lets not take it literally, she taunted him, dared him, he was intrigued and couldn't put her words ( and the nazuk Kamaria) out of his mind.Something in her challenge beckoned him and he landed upShe willed him to come, remember her saying to Kusum - woh aayegaSo underneath her taunt was a desire to get him here - tumne mujhe bina dekhe na kyon kaha?So she called him, and he came, and they both realize that2. You didn't let me goShe wouldn't show him her faceShe wouldn't let him speak to herShe let him know that her father would be devastated when he finds about the rishtaShe says go, but she intrigues him, attracts him, looks out for him, helps him, fights for himWhen he was leaving before the Yash fiasco, she was at the gate watching him, silently.I like to think that they were both talking about what was happening beyond the words, and beyond the sequence of events
Originally posted by: arshicritic
All this while I was reading all the other posts on this thread and all was said so beautifully, and I felt, nothing for me to add, except wow and wonderful.So here I found my opportunity to poke my nose in1. You called me :Lets not take it literally, she taunted him, dared him, he was intrigued and couldn't put her words ( and the nazuk Kamaria) out of his mind.Something in her challenge beckoned him and he landed upShe willed him to come, remember her saying to Kusum - woh aayegaSo underneath her taunt was a desire to get him here - tumne mujhe bina dekhe na kyon kaha?So she called him, and he came, and they both realize that2. You didn't let me goShe wouldn't show him her faceShe wouldn't let him speak to herShe let him know that her father would be devastated when he finds about the rishtaShe says go, but she intrigues him, attracts him, looks out for him, helps him, fights for himWhen he was leaving before the Yash fiasco, she was at the gate watching him, silently.I like to think that they were both talking about what was happening beyond the words, and beyond the sequence of events
Originally posted by: vaishali-AR
@smrth- I agree with you on everything.. Saras has made some grave mistakes.. Its not just writing the letter. I am sure there's more than the rejection in that infamous letter that has hurt her..She keeps mentioning how he said relationships are burden and that she shouldn't put the burden of marriage on him.. That had completely ruined the image of the man she had pictured in her dreams..A girl of her stature ( morally speaking) will want the man of her dreams to be ''up there'' Saras had ruined that image of him by writing that letter.. I wish they had let us know the full content of the letter..After coming this far, knowing the fact about the painting, her dream, from Kumari and then all that transpired between them eversince, I would expect Saras not to confront her with her ''weakness'' , the fact that he is her weakness.. respect the woman in her..be a little sensitive thats it..! Repeatedly saying that you called me, you stopped me on her face is kinda ... not right, specially when he has an idea what she feels for him..After witnessing the whole family drama, where his own mom tried to tarnish her honor, I was expecting him to be little more patient and sensitive when she yelled at him.. That wasnt the moment to say you stopped me, you called me..Because I love Saras so much, I am willing to look at it the way Arshicritic explained..but from a neutral point of view and just on face value, those words sounded inappropriate and unecessary in that situation.. The last lines where he admits about their ''ehsaas'' made up for it..just about it..!!
Having said all that, I do think that it would be wrong to say who is more wrong or right than the other.. The whole point is Saras is misguided by his own inner conflicts and contradictions.. His feelings , actions and words are not in tandem.. rather all over the place.. Kumud will show him the way..she is the light in his darkness..she will guide him through..the first phase of their love story seems to be that..the focus of the later being on how Saras guides her through in her dark times...
Vaishali again you hit the Point I wanted to say. It's a basic respect to her- her essence that he has already started adoring- is missing in his aggressive assertions, despite his visible 'plunging' and verbalized admissions. That is bothering and not permitting a full convincement on his role. Unfortunately, it appears, 'disrespect' quotient is going to continue in next track- 'Kumud after disinterested Saras'- too! Here Cvs' ploy to justify his outward coldness covertly, his superstition, is little artificial, shaky and untenable on the long run. A weakness, that was never there in the book. And cant help but notice, even a well-contemplated deviation from the book (no suicide, no demons, no superstition there) is going awry in first steps.😕
Central theme slightly deviates; In book SC-Kumud had fallen headlong for each other post engagement and they had unambiguously admitted their love. To mention, how it has irrevocably seized Kumud's consciousness, quoting author's one sentence (from many such on both) ," nadi na nirmal jal ma aakash nu pratibimb anivarya atyajaya thai pade tem Saraswatichandra na antahkaran nu pratibimb nirdosh kanya ni mansik srushti ma sampurna, apratihat ane sarvakalin avakaash paami gayu..." Such kind of impact requires 'two way' call and mutual respects, not one sided 'deferments.😊
Am I going unnecessarily deep? Pardon me, if so.
Originally posted by: humeshaa
Anything to bring SaMud closer lol.. and don't worry about the chappals.. "main hoon na, Kumud".. i mean veera..😆
Central theme slightly deviates; In book SC-Kumud had fallen headlong for each other post engagement and they had unambiguously admitted their love. To mention, how it has irrevocably seized Kumud's consciousness, quoting author's one sentence (from many such on both) ," nadi na nirmal jal ma aakash nu pratibimb anivarya atyajaya thai pade tem Saraswatichandra na antahkaran nu pratibimb nirdosh kanya ni mansik srushti ma sampurna, apratihat ane sarvakalin avakaash paami gayu..." Such kind of impact requires 'two way' call and mutual respects, not one sided 'deferments.😊
Am I going unnecessarily deep? Pardon me, if so.