SC 18th century instead of 21st

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#1

I think SC set in 18th century as per novel would have made this serial more popular.

We would get to see customes etc of those times and this Gua Hatya track, LNV announcing marriage without discussing with educated son, a son who is very loyal and respects parents, go to temple every day etc would have gone well then and been more believable. Nowadays you forget rarely never find such people hence connecting to such plot become difficult
These tracks become unbelievable in 21st century hence not many people want to watch it. The show should have been set in 18th century only to become very successful. People would not mind watching 18th century back on TV look at some shows like Mahadev, Jhansi Ran Laxmi Bai they are very successful
Another thing do not deviate from authors story add a few extra tracks to showcase that era.
Edited by myviewprem - 12 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

20

Views

2.1k

Users

11

Likes

22

Frequent Posters

Marybarton thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
It is set in today's time with traditional practices in mind. I don't think it is very unrealistic for today's day and age. There are many people who have these views and not everything they value is necessarily bad.

I am not Hindu but I do get why someone who sees the cow as a god can be very hurt by the killing of one. Especially rurally where it is needed for this family.
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Marybarton

It is set in today's time with traditional practices in mind. I don't think it is very unrealistic for today's day and age. There are many people who have these views and not everything they value is necessarily bad.

I am not Hindu but I do get why someone who sees the cow as a god can be very hurt by the killing of one. Especially rurally where it is needed for this family.

I can understand Gau hatya track but am not fine with such punishment in today's age for a harvard returned person. Think realistic which educated harvard returned multi milloniare will agree to undergo such punishment. Making pots to buy a cow which costs 25K today looks unrealistic. Some social work would have been better with a fine of the cows value. Why that poor family should go hungry till Saras learns to make pots. Hence i think such punishment would be believable for 18th century not 21st century.
I do believe that in villages even today all life is respected and cow is holy. And that punishment would have been fine if Saras was an villager who knew how to make pots etc.
Edited by myviewprem - 12 years ago
.Anamika. thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#4

I think Bhansali wanted to make Saraswati Chandra relatable to this century. This way he can make the story more modern as well. A love story can be taken from any era and still fit into a more modern world because love itself will remain pure (at least in theory!) I like that it's set in a more modern era. This gives me more hope that the ending will be happy.

But I agree that a Harvard return making pots is far-fetching. But then again, that's what's unique about the show right? The fact that Kumud and Saras are so different from normal people. That's really what makes their love story worth telling.

Posted: 12 years ago
#5
Oh, i disagree!

Slb hs med it in d 21st century only!

And about d boys like saras r rare, if u recollect d promos, everyone hd sed "aise ladke kahan milte hain"-wich is nt unrealistic!

If it hsnt hpnd wid u means it is unrealistic?

And abt d gau hatya punishment, u go 2 a conservative village n kill d cow n u think u wil b spared? NO! Dey wil punish u lyk hell, i hv seen it...bt u hvnt, so it's unrealistic!

And, if d novel ws even more conservative, hd it been d base, saras wud never hv been allowed 2 contact wid d girl whom he hd 2 marry! And, dat novel ws even more sadistic!

Sorry, bt pls think practically b4 posting 😊
Arshics thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: myviewprem

I can understand Gau hatya track but am not fine with such punishment in today's age for a harvard returned person. Think realistic which educated harvard returned multi milloniare will agree to undergo such punishment. Making pots to buy a cow which costs 25K today looks unrealistic. Some social work would have been better with a fine of the cows value. Why that poor family should go hungry till Saras learns to make pots. Hence i think such punishment would be believable for 18th century not 21st century.
I do believe that in villages even today all life is respected and cow is holy. And that punishment would have been fine if Saras was an villager who knew how to make pots etc.


It was not hatya, it was an accident, the cow came on the road.

While it does not lessen the tragedy and adequate compensation must be given, to brand him hatyara, and all that is not right, and no one is arguing on those grounds,

And your point on why should the family go hungry till he masters a trade he is not fit for, when he could do so much more for the family, in a shorter time, is absolutely right. It just shows the village heads in a poor light who are completely insensitive to the plight of the widow.

.Anamika. thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#7

Yeah, what really bothers me is that all the villagers claim that Saras has all these bad sins and yet nobody is willing to help a woman out who has lost her only source of income? What kind of a person does that make them? Won't God punish them for ignoring the plight of a helpless woman in their village?

It's hard for me to understand that ALL of this is for ONE cow. And at the end of the day, it was really an accident.

ReenBean thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#8
Villages are like that in the cow matter. Many aspects are just plain stupid, like the woman & her family going hungry so that SC can repent. But timeline wise it is good because back then a girl would not have been so outgoing. There would be no story if the main leads didn't have disagreements, especially if Kumud's voice is taken away.
Diamond_14 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: .Anamika.

I think Bhansali wanted to make Saraswati Chandra relatable to this century. This way he can make the story more modern as well. A love story can be taken from any era and still fit into a more modern world because love itself will remain pure (at least in theory!) I like that it's set in a more modern era. This gives me more hope that the ending will be happy.

But I agree that a Harvard return making pots is far-fetching. But then again, that's what's unique about the show right? The fact that Kumud and Saras are so different from normal people. That's really what makes their love story worth telling.


well said.👏exactly my thoughts. it should be noted on star plus website itself it said that village is little backward in time.
"Kumud is born in a middle class family and is based in a small backward village of Gujarat. She is a girl of 'today' and considering the circumstances of her birth, she is way ahead of the times in her little backward village. " so it's perfectly natural to behave like that. as for saras, although he may be harvard graduate in the 21st century, he still follows the traditions and values which his mother taught him. buying a cow with his money is nothing for him, but the priest told him to stay and work in that woman's house to repay her. he is following his words.
Marybarton thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: myviewprem

I can understand Gau hatya track but am not fine with such punishment in today's age for a harvard returned person. Think realistic which educated harvard returned multi milloniare will agree to undergo such punishment. Making pots to buy a cow which costs 25K today looks unrealistic. Some social work would have been better with a fine of the cows value. Why that poor family should go hungry till Saras learns to make pots. Hence i think such punishment would be believable for 18th century not 21st century.
I do believe that in villages even today all life is respected and cow is holy. And that punishment would have been fine if Saras was an villager who knew how to make pots etc.



I think we are just seeing it differently, so I don't expect you to agree but I will explain from my point of view.

I am no millionaire but I know some who don't have their nose up in the air. I went to a rival school of Harvard's and don't think either I or any of my friends are above a real prayaschit like the villagers subscribed to him because of the crime they thought he committed. They did not know he was so educated or rich, a wrong doing is just that, doesn't matter who does it. Kind of like why we should ask for pardon for a particular actor's jail sentence just because he's famous and special. They did not know it was an accident because Yash ran from there and Saras took the blame because he didn't want Yash to risk his mom. The most important thing here is that Saras is making this sacrifice because he understands the value of a mother having lost his.

The punishment is a spiritual one to teach the wrongdoer some humility and modesty. Hard work and labor can teach a person to walk in Ilaben's shoes to see the hunger and pain she will now suffer. I don't think Saras is above it because he's rich and educated. He does not think so either, given that he's a spiritual man. It is afterall the Gandhian way, isn't it?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".