Originally posted by: Ashrozia
Well, why do you take it personally? Did I say that you are being partial? I didn't. I just stated an example when Sadhna also doubted someone else. She doesn't get labeled as shallow for that, then why should Ragini? Just trying to be fair. Sorry for the offense either way :)
I am not taking personally. I wont take offence in any case, especially from someone whom I hardly know. This is the way how I explain things, its my attitude..there is no love, hatred, any feeling involved for anyone here. This is my passion.
Shallow or deep is considered (again as per me), by the percentage of reactions a human shows. One cant judge a person by one reaction. If a student scores in ten tests..., 90% in nine tests and in one test fails, then the student is not called weak student. That one failure is considered as an exception. And as the important proverb says "exception is not an example".On the contrary, if a student fails 5 times and excels 5 times, the student is said to be inconsistent, one cannot really take anyside...be it good or bad.
That was the difference in the character sketch. It has nothing to do with Sara Khan or Parul Chauhan, it was how the character was sketched. If at all, anyone is to be blamed/ criticised, it should be the creatives or the story. There were numerous examples...like when Sadhna was shown to do "Vrat" for Ragini during her pregnancy, Ragini was shown to act childish and calling her husband out of an official meeting for having "golgappes". This according to me is not a very mature act. But it might be mature for other people. For Sadhna, I do not think, her act of keeping a "Vrat" at the time of pregnancy because of prominition was not very right.
Edited by Omshanti1111 - 15 years ago