World is full of hatred,give love a chance:Note PG6 - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

42

Views

2.8k

Users

13

Likes

92

Frequent Posters

gilmores thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 15 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: Kasturilover

Heyy😃
I totally agree on YRF shows RC and even Mahi Way,,,,,some of the episodes were super cool. even Seven was intelligent. Even the way they were shot....so refreshing. No woman dressed like a Christmas tree with heavy jewellry😆, settings were common place and people sobbed only once in a while
Absolutely agree on the kids part...save alone Kavya the girls at times are just not pitched well, especially Khushi. She is cute, but her dialogues and thoughts mostly no longer are, they seem that of an adult.
I would also wish Ragini to be more well projected. the only thing her character does is cook, arrange clothes and be worried. I mean there is more to her than that right. Could they not have shown her as running the Nari Niketan or something of that sort.

They were a very refreshing chnage! Very modern and urban! Well directed and very well written!They were real! It's a pity they were on a channel like Sony who doesn't know how to promote its shows at all.
As for Ragini, I gave up a long time back on her character. Sad because I really liked her too, more than Sadhna who sacrificed way too much and her jiji jiji chant which continued into her pregnancy was super annoying..There was a point in time when there used to more substance in Ragini. She had low-confidence because of her skin color, her mother's treatment towards it along with society's, but she was strong in her own way. She was a dancer! Dance was her life and then she got married and became a doormat wife only cooking, and standing in the background. Basically after she came back from her honeymoon she had NO role in Bidaai. You wouldn't even know she existed. And then the writers decided to give her a role but they made you wish that they had just continued to ignore Ragini and let her cook like before. Earlier this year she had some role because they had to try to fix the HUGE damage they'd done by ruining Ragini completely.
I was never happy with the leap and the deaths, but somewhere I had hoped that Ragini would be stronger after losing so much. The first few episodes of the leap that I watched quickly changed that. Should have remembered that this was Bidaai. Ragini cannot be strong.
Edited by chocolover89 - 15 years ago
Sweet_Waters thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: chocolover89

They were a very refreshing chnage! Very modern and urban! Well directed and very well written!They were real! It's a pity they were on a channel like Sony who doesn't know how to promote its shows at all.

As for Ragini, I gave up a long time back on her character. Sad because I really liked her too, more than Sadhna who sacrificed way too much for my liking..There was a point in time when there used to more substance in Ragini. She had low-confidence because of her skin color, her mother's treatment towards it along with society's, but she was strong in her own way. She was a dancer! Dance was her life and then she got married and became a doormat wife only cooking, and standing in the background. Basically after she came back from her honeymoon she had NO role in Bidaai. You wouldn't even know she existed. And then the writers decided to give her a role but they made you wish that they had just continued to ignore Ragini and let her cook like before. Earlier this year she had some role because they had to try to fix the HUGE damage they'd done by ruining Ragini completely.
I was never happy with the leap and the deaths, but somewhere I had hoped that Ragini would be stronger after losing so much. The first few episodes of the leap that I watched quickly changed that. Should have remembered that this was Bidaai. Ragini cannot be strong.

So true.Agreed especially with the bold one.I too wanted to see a Ragini strong enough to take her own decissions, facing challenges and moving forward on her own.She had always been treated as a very weak character like Vasu who is always been as something who couldn't understand except yelling, Kaushi who always show discriminations, Mamaji who utter only baashans(Earlier before the leap I respected him, but now I don't understand him) and Inder who is still spineless.Bidaai will never change.Even if they show people changed, again after some time they'll be definetely back to square one(Not to forget that Alekh is still pagal).
Suchi- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#33
IN simple words..
Its a story.. and everyone likes stories to be read to them in a way they like.

Cinderalla is a famous story its beeen re-written and published many times as movies in different point of views. Some accepted some not.

Some like the original some like the new =hybrid type.

So thats the case with Bidaai..

I like SaaGini and Alvir

For me they made the story rock. The characters were really good. If bidaai were a book I would love for it to continue as sadhana being alive and Ranvir being alive but since its not.. I am dissapointed that my story is not going the way I like.

and many are like this here. THey are not being harsh , they just do not like the story any more and want the Cvs to read them their fav. Story in the style they came to love.


The new innovative is not appreciated so .. its a matter of taste.

People like Apoorva.. I am ok with him.

People are defending Saakshi, I am like are you kidding me?
I totally do not think she deserves Alekh or Kushi.

So.. at teh end of the day it boils down to personal choice and we here at teh forum are sitting and chatting with each other and sharing out feelings.

If we didn't have IF forums may be we would have met some viewers in our neighbourhood and had a cup of tea and discussed about how Rajan ji is loosing his touch.. so now would that be harsh?

No..

Its plain discussion, we like we dont like.. and get back to our lives businesses : )

arjun_rocks thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#34
was in hurry before as iam seeing sum posts about second chance but i dont think anmol and ragini are good examples of second chance as per the story. I dont find that exemplary from any angle and what RS is trying show . If anyone seriously want to appeciate sumthing about remarriage and widow wedding watch Balika vadhu where reamarriage of a widow was shown as it was the part of story . But In bidaai this second chance seems to be all forcefully incoroporated, be it a person named anmol (picked the name from ranvir ragini love story) or itz ragini remarriage just after ranvir's death moreover there is no sign of ranvir memories everything is illogiacal and forcefully incorporated.I dont think anmol ragini to be given as exemplaries of second chance .
The entire track is bad be it aalekh abnormal and suddenly a gal comes and he starts calling her sadhna . Who finds these rs so called second chances beautifull, i found them forcefully barged and dramatic😕😕
Edited by sweetkanu - 15 years ago
Suchi- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#35
Sugna's marriage should go down in telivision history. She is one good actress Veebha...

And yes that truly portrays what Widows have to go through and what re-marriage is all about!

arjun_rocks thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: suchitra_1

Sugna's marriage should go down in telivision history. She is one good actress Veebha...

And yes that truly portrays what Widows have to go through and what re-marriage is all about!

agree with u that was the beat example remarriages, second love or widow marriage with the beautiful portray of emotions and social msg .
and yes the actress playing sugna rol is great actress .iam surprsied to see here people are saying anmol ragini the gratest example of second chance when it was all forced . And now itz aalekh turn .😕😕
Edited by sweetkanu - 15 years ago
Lovenarbhi thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: sweetkanu

agree with u that was the beat example remarriages, second love or widow marriage with the beautiful portray of emotions and social msg .

and yes the actress playing sugna rol is great actress .iam surprsied to see here people are saying anmol ragini the gratest example of second chance when it was all forced . And now itz aalekh turn .😕😕



BV was a story on social issues only na? But in bidaai this remarriage itself come becoz of actors quitting the show. I dont think such an issue of widow remarriage will ever occur in bidaai That is my POV. So that is why everyone is saying that ragini has to move on. But it is true that they should show ragini thinking of ranveer. So it will much more real.
arjun_rocks thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: kamuralee



BV was a story on social issues only na? But in bidaai this remarriage itself come becoz of actors quitting the show. I dont think such an issue of widow remarriage will ever occur in bidaai That is my POV. So that is why everyone is saying that ragini has to move on. But it is true that they should show ragini thinking of ranveer. So it will much more real.

suks u didn't get my point my post was what beautiful second chances people are talking about when everything is forecfully incoroporated from anmol's name to remarriage with in two episodes . Is there happening any proper dealing with the track ???? i brought balika vadhu point here beacuse they showed hw a gal remarried what problem she faced ??? It isn't easy to forget ur first love u should have to watch it??? and hw a gal agian fall in love???
but here they showed a stupid track ranvir died took promise ,ragini got married with in two dayz all bakwaas
Edited by sweetkanu - 15 years ago
Lovenarbhi thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: sweetkanu

suks u didn't get my point my post was what beautiful second chances people are talking about when everything is forecfully incoroporated from anmol's name to remarriage with in two episodes . Is there happening any proper dealing with the track ????



Haa yaar, i understood your point. Par we are so helpless. They say ranveer has taken a promise from ragini not to keep a single photo of his and compelled her to marry anmol. His death itself is so bogus then, what can we expect from the CTS
jyoti06 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Master Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 15 years ago
#40

Mod's note

Ok dear I hv no reason to close your post because u hv just stated your opinion which is fine even though it would hv been better if the same was conveyed to me via PM service ..then I could hv told u in detail what action we take against such troublemakers who spread negativity in the forum...we can't tell all this in open as its not allowed but that doesn't mean we hv not taken any action against the troublemakers...
If I m not wrong..sinse last one week..I hv not come across a single negative comment on the show in any thread🤔...and if there was any such negative comment..then it should hv been reported na😳...
Now few facts which I would like to state here...If someone says its better for Ragini to die than marry Anmol...can it really b considered a bashing ??...I think its an individual opinion and more like a prediction...bashing will b something if we say "Ragini is a **** and so she should die"...thats where u r breaking a rule...correct me if I m wrong ??..so while moderating we need to take care of the difference between bashing and constructive criticism and individual opinions...based on that we decide what sort of action to take against the members..yes if comments like "Ragini should die" go on repeatedly in the forum to instigate fights then we definitely put a mod's warning there and close the post but one cannot expect the mods to go on banning members everyday simply because they wrote something negative or else it will look like a dictatorship ..a forum has given this right to the members to express their opinion ...positive or negative..so how can we mods stop someone from writing their perspective just because we don't like it..tomorrow if Apu leaves the serial and is replaced by a new actor...Ragini gets married to that character..I m sure Angini fans will think the same way and then new set of fans will hv the same problem..so while moderating we hv to take into account all these possibilities before passing final judgement..we cannot take decisions overnight to ban someone just because he wrote a certain comment...And those who know me will know I m myself a big Apu fan but as a mod I need to take decision without any favoritism😳
Coming to trps...because of those negative comments only a separate trp post is made in the sticky and no other trp post is allowed so that negativity can b restricted to only one thread and those who don't want to see those negative comments can hv the option of ignoring that single thread...So then why question is raised on action not taken here ??😳...Taking action doesn't mean like a hitler I will keep on banning everyone na😆...There r many other ways to solve problems and maintain peace in the forum😳...yes only when members cross their limits of decency they get a direct ban or raise in warning meter and those members r well aware how the action is taken on them...
I hope I hv answered all queries now😳
Bidaai Dev team

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".