I think there has been a misunderstanding between the Saas Bina Sasural Forum members recently. It's as if there is a schism; as if one side supports Nanima and expresses outrage at Chedi and Sudha's treatment of her while the other half derides Nanima. But let me just state that these are two very extreme positions on the issue.
I have commented on such topics before, and because of the question asked, said that Nanima was harsh in her punishment of Toasty. And then I was questioned because the other party assumed I completely hated Nanima, and completely wished her gone. That is not the case! Yes, she was wrong in her punishment of Toasty. She acted in the heat of the moment, and if Chedi is to be accused of snapping at her, then she can't go blame-free for what she did to Toasty.
But on the other hand, she did repent. She really and truly wants to have her daughter in law back. And also, to some extent, she does have a right to yell at her daughter in law. No, she shouldn't have said that "Toasty isn't worthy of being called a Bahu," or banned her from the kitchen, but she is not a villain because of saying so. And to further clear the point, NO ONE IS CALLING HER A VILLAIN!!
No one is perfect and infallible, neither Naanima nor Chedi. And I think it would be for the best if we stop trying to idealize one and demonize the other. They both have their virtues and their vices.
I hope I haven't offended anyone with what I have said. If I have, then I sincerely apologize. I just had to make my point known.
Thank you