Dear all,
I have been thinking about this for few days considering the craziness for voting and the influence of the drama on voting. Since this channels have a revenue sharing agreement with the telephone companies for all kinds of reality shows, they have a "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" to dramatise the event and gain the votes from the viewers.
1. As per one of the interviews of vishal, when Ashaji and Himesh drama happened, everyone was laughing but it was shown as if there is lot of tension. (Dramatising by editing)
2. As per Barnaliji's talk with Poonam, She had requested to not to publicise the report about the girl she adopted (Dramatising by sympathy)
3. Declaration of zones, arranging big gatherings and welcome as if a minister has come when the contestants visit their home (Dramatising the popularity)
4. Royal cub of bengal, Raja Hindusthani, Pakistan ke mahabali (Dramatising by regional influence)
There are so many ways of dramatising that this people have used to influence the votes from public. They dont care who gets the votes, what they care about is the number of votes and they will use any pawn to get more votes. Its clearly result of this "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" created by the revenue sharing agreement with telephone companies.
Since the channel makes the profits out of advertisement revenue, sponsorship revenue, sell of albums etc. I believe that public can file a writ petition for ban on such revenue sharing agreements by reasoning of "CONFLICT OF INTEREST".
A writ petition can be filed to rule all such revenue sharing agreements between channels and telephone companies as void. So the base reason of dramatisation will be outđ
What are your views regarding this?