Irfan-Sinchan out, Judges use VETO - Page 2

The other CONTESTANTS didn't seem to be VERY HAPPY about this decision 😕

But what happens when contestantes like UA or TV or SR
get voted out after a great perfmance?

SI should have gone out in the first place. I dont agree with grrovy gurus this time.

Originally posted by: angel1601

according to me they were correct😊

irfan and sinchan are improving i dont think the judges brought them back because of dr rajkumars death

i think they didnt save vr because of that shayeri melodrama

and i didnt like niladri and vinita

just my opinion

waise its normal we always differ😆

😆 Yeh baat bhi sahi hai.

Originally posted by: apparaohoare

The judges are bringing regionalism in this contest and this is not fair.

I am sorry did you miss the entire SRGMP C2005?

BTW Appaji congrats on becoming a DAZZLER😉

CHALLENGE 2005 did not have REGIONALISM on the JUDGE'S PART .... you should remember that sareg .... 😊 😊

Thanks on letting us know appaji and your av well 😉

Not seen show my opinion no veto is unfair

Originally posted by: sareg

I am sorry did you miss the entire SRGMP C2005?

BTW Appaji congrats on becoming a DAZZLER😉

I thought they will get a lesson after C 2005. BTW, the mentors being regional is OK, because they were all trying to win. Everything is fair in love and war. (Love for Himesh and war for Ismail Darbar😉). But here the judges should be neutral and treat all the contestants equally.

Arre, I did not notice, main to DAZZLER ban gaya. 😃, Thank You

Originally posted by: jmn7

Raktima's elimination increased votes for ujjaini.Till now raktima was splitting votes of ujjaini.All the people who voted for raktima are now voting for ujjaini.This happened in challenge 2005.In the first round ujjaini got the second lowest votes among the girls.In the second round she got the highest votes among the girls.
If the judges decision to veto irfan,sinchan was wrtong then how can we justify debojit complaining in the seventh round that bsnl lines in assam are not working,so he could not get that many votes.If that is justified then this is also justified.
Every contestant relies on the home region for votes.If votes of home region are affected by some reason,it is justified to use the veto.If they were riots in calcutta,and voting is affected then I think the judges should use the veto for saptak,ujjaini.

These judges are the worst in saregamapa's history.But i this case I think they were foprced to use the veto.

Ya eggggggggzactly...forced to continue the show to few more episodes..

By the way ..do Zee/SONY have any contract with the cellular companies and they need to raise certain money thru public voting..????

I think the show continues till that target is reached and we are blessed with episodes like final Mahayudh,antim muqabla,final challenge etc...

This time the fund collected through public voting is falling short of the target..and i am sure we will see more vetoes,regional factors, walkouts and may be even splitting of jodis at the final stage...

So lets be prepared....

Originally posted by: jmn7

If the judges decision to veto irfan,sinchan was wrong then how can we justify debojit complaining in the seventh round that bsnl lines in assam are not working,so he could not get that many votes.If that is justified then this is also justified.

What the hell are you talking about. 😡 How is it connected to Debu? Please explain.

Please also explain how you interlinked Debu with the judges decision.

Originally posted by: jmn7

If the judges decision to veto irfan,sinchan was wrtong then how can we justify debojit complaining in the seventh round that bsnl lines in assam are not working,so he could not get that many votes.If that is justified then this is also justified.

What if i complain that Himesh ji's songs are highly injurious for heart patients and true music lovers...!!!!!!Will he stop singing??????????
And if he continues to yell...will that be justified.??????

Hope i confused enough...😆