WHoevr said Hemu cant sing at High Notes - Page 7

hemu is d best 😭 😭 love him :(

Originally posted by: apparaohoare

HATS OFF TO YOU SWASTIKA. You are 100% correct. Hariharan goes higher while Hema goes lower. After I read your post, I listened to both, then tried it on the synthesizer. If you try to play it on a keyboard or harmonium then you understand the difference more clearly.

But again Hema was fantastic in that song.

Atleast someone agrees that I am a bit informed about music!😆😆

Come on, guys, I am Hemu's fan, usko neecha dikha ke mujhe kya milega but I am honest to the core.

Originally posted by: parineetha

One pundit said Vandemataram is not difficult because Rehaman could sing it. I don't know how this pundit knows that Rehman cannot sing difficult songs. But anyway what a great way to analyze!!! Must say MINDBLOWING!!!

Pundit ka naam le lo. No need to be bitter, if you want to have a healthy discussion, take his name loud and say that you don't agree. It works for me.
Ok, main hi naam le leti hoon. Yahaan per Abhilash Dwarkanath ki baat ho rahi hai. Even I don't agree with some of his points but that doesn't take away from him his superior knowledge about music. Can you disrespect him for that?? No. He said what he felt , now its your decision whether to agree with it or not.

I feel Vande mataram is a difficult song to sing live since it requires a lot of breath control and a high range. But I have nothing to say against Abhilash.

Originally posted by: parineetha

One pundit said Arijit from FG sang this song better. Let me first tell u that I'm great fan of Arijit. But when he sang this particular song, nobody including the judges could hear the lower notes of the song. I'm perplexed how this pundit could hear it. Yeh pundit tho sab ke ustaad nikle.
For me, Hema sang this song exceptionally well, attempting it itself is a big thing. The taans in this song are more complex than what these pundits termed as most difficult song in history of music "Na tho karwan ki talaash hai".

Well many said that and I was one of them. I agree that the lower notes were not heard by us but Arijit was very much at ease when he sang the song, his voice was very smooth even during the high notes and he took many taans. He also had to do some funny steps like throwing his hands in air which broke his concentration.
But Hemu was a bit conscious about the higher notes and didn't take as many taans.
It was then that I realized that Arijit would have gained a lot more if he had come to SRGMP.

BTW, I am a big Arijit basher, you can check old posts at FG section.

"Na to karwaan ki talaash hai" - I don't even know that song😆

Originally posted by: parineetha

Coming to Debos exceptionally great singing according to these pundits. Given a fast paced song all his talent is exposed. He literally talks fast instead of singing. Totally expressionless. What did he do to "Suno gaur se". That was too fast paced for him. Its not that he forgot the song like how Hema forgot the lyrics for "Dil Diya hai", he just could not sing at that speed.
And one more pundits comment was Debo voice is better than Hema's voice. Hema's fans what do we say to this… Maar diya jai ke chod diya jaay…..Maine tho unn forums mein likhna badh kar diya, Kichad mein pathhar kya phekna.
Only Hema success will show these pundits their right place.

HEMA UR THE BEST!!!

I prefer Hema to Debo and I like Hema's voice quality better. And maybe there is a bit of bias in their posts but all the member's posts are biased towards their favourites. But why are you turning this into a personal war?? You seem to be sensible... please read your post again and you would find it fruitless. Gajji wants us to fight and we are just making a fool of ourselves.

-----------------------------

Again, These pundits are not self proclaimed. We think they deserve to be called as "pundits". They are all respected by most of the members here and that is why they are around here. Otherwise, why would they waste their time in this forum ?

Pundit = knowledgable person , but your sarcasm was obvious.

Originally posted by: simranlaks_2005

100% true, thats why I posed the same question to Swastika!!

I have answered that question and it has been confirmed by apparaohoare.

Originally posted by: apparaohoare

No No No No No, do you think I am crazy that I will compare Hema with Hariharan. I am a Hema fan, but not a lunatic. Hema is very good but it will still take him another 15 years to even come close to hariharan.

After I hrd hemu sing, I made my mom hear the original and I felt that Hemu's "voice" sounded better in this song while Hariharan had a shrilly quality to it.
But of course, that doesn't mean Hemu is better than Hariharan! Atleast not for another 10 yrs (or more)

Oki..Now Dat U've answered all ur critics in detail,U can be called a Pundit too..goin by the trend 😉 ..Juz Kiddin 😆

Originally posted by: apparaohoare

With due respects parineetha ji, till now I thought you are a true music lover. But these kind of comments about another music lover is just not acceptable. I am a Hemu fan too and I expected something better than this from a Hemu fan. Let's just not get carried away.

After reading your post I felt that you are angry because no one in this forum thought you are a pundit too, so from now on I will consider you as the Pundit. But please stop this bashing.

Thanks , but please dont add me to that list, i'm better off of it.

Yes,We'd be stupid comparin him to Hariharan.Hariharan is an almost perfect singer.
Hope Hemu bcumz one too 😃

Originally posted by: arun_8687

Oki..Now Dat U've answered all ur critics in detail,U can be called a Pundit too..goin by the trend 😉 ..Juz Kiddin 😆

punditain😆😆

Originally posted by: Swastika

Pundit ka naam le lo. No need to be bitter, if you want to have a healthy discussion, take his name loud and say that you don't agree. It works for me.
Ok, main hi naam le leti hoon. Yahaan per Abhilash Dwarkanath ki baat ho rahi hai. Even I don't agree with some of his points but that doesn't take away from him his superior knowledge about music. Can you disrespect him for that?? No. He said what he felt , now its your decision whether to agree with it or not.

I feel Vande mataram is a difficult song to sing live since it requires a lot of breath control and a high range. But I have nothing to say against Abhilash.

i don't enjoy sarcasm myself, but for me its very difficult to counter them directly cause I'm not trained in music and I'm not familiar with the music jargon. But definitely I think music is universal, and I believe in my music instincts even though I'm not as knowledgeable as them. But when such people who know about music make such biased comments, others who are not so good at it will get influenced. Is this correct?

By the way I dint know sDwarkanath made this comment.

Originally posted by: Swastika

Well many said that and I was one of them. I agree that the lower notes were not heard by us but Arijit was very much at ease when he sang the song, his voice was very smooth even during the high notes and he took many taans. He also had to do some funny steps like throwing his hands in air which broke his concentration.
But Hemu was a bit conscious about the higher notes and didn't take as many taans.
It was then that I realized that Arijit would have gained a lot more if he had come to SRGMP.

BTW, I am a big Arijit basher, you can check old posts at FG section.

"Na to karwaan ki talaash hai" - I don't even know that song

Arijit for me is a great singer. What I was mentioning was is about his lower notes in the beginning of the song. People said, Hemas voice broke during singing lower note, which I know for sure is wrong. Regarding taans I agree to what u said about Arijit. But voice quality, again I would say Hema the best.

Originally posted by: Swastika

I prefer Hema to Debo and I like Hema's voice quality better. And maybe there is a bit of bias in their posts but all the member's posts are biased towards their favourites. But why are you turning this into a personal war?? You seem to be sensible... please read your post again and you would find it fruitless. Gajji wants us to fight and we are just making a fool of ourselves.

-----------------------------

Again, These pundits are not self proclaimed. We think they deserve to be called as "pundits". They are all respected by most of the members here and that is why they are around here. Otherwise, why would they waste their time in this forum ?

Pundit = knowledgable person , but your sarcasm was obvious.

You are free to respect them, but for me they are biased. They might be knowledgeable but they are biased, and that is what I intend to tell people, nothing else. So thanks for supporting my point.