Indian Idol ..abhijeeth Sawanth Beaten up - Page 4

Originally posted by: surmai_shaam

The first thing the bus drivers or truck drivers do after an accident is RUN. Mob can kill you in an instant. In US you are charged with hit and run and that is a serious charge.

Originally posted by: Summer3

In USA one up and coming Indian Golfer, Arjun Atwal, did some speed racing on the roads that resulted in the death of a friend. He himself too was injured which was a huge set back in his career. Fortunately they did not kill any pedestrians. Only after several years he is coming back slowly.
Racing and killing or injuring others is a criminal act and they should be jailed, the laws in certain countries would be death too.
Sometimes when a person is young they tend to be rash or do things without thinking.
Public safety is important and drunken driving is a major crime in many countries. Our sister Haaru ji, or Malaysian Girl, while driving, was hit badly by a drunken driver and is still recuperating. Waheguru may she be okay soon.

OMG!!
when did this happen???
God Bless Them.....

yah i saw on our local newspaper!disgusting!!i was a huge fan of him!!Shi!

Originally posted by: Osprisshow

yah i saw on our local newspaper!disgusting!!i was a huge fan of him!!Shi!

There are two sides to the story and in one he is a Hero and in the other a Villain.

Now lets see what I think of it after seeing that damaged golden Honda city.

The way the car's front and bumper were damaged from the centre after the accident looks like the scooter hit on head on with the car. Now, if the damage is accessed, it simply CANNOT be a high speed crash. Because most of the damage to the bonnet was caused by the rider falling on it and hitting the winshield. If the crash was a high speed, the car would had blood stains and mangled heap of the scooter at its body. The fact was that this 2007 Honda city is not a solidly built car per se but its body is designed to absorb the impact force and deform sideways in the head on crash. The scooter, grey activa looks to be OK and the photos of teens is questionable. They look too young to even handle a fragile scooter and could have caused an impact as their balance was not maintained.

The honda city looks driveable to me and definitely he impact does not look to be at more than 30-40 odd kmph. At 60 kmph, the bonnet would have come off and even the roof of the car might have suffered structural damage going by the car's cab forward design.

Now, if wine or alcohol was found in abhijeet's audi A4, does it make any difference whether he was drunk or not when the alcohol tests showed NO? Even i can carry them provided I am no drunk, maybe or other persons perhaps?
And if prajakta was to blame for all this mess, why would she tell the whole story in less than 24 hours to a reporter and that too, the way it was told was perfectly mature way of handling the situation. Bit by bit she told the story. Other people would have just paniked and even shy away from reporters for many days to come, but not she.

The main problem is that in India, if any accident involves two different class of vehicles, always the fact remains that the person driving the bigger vehicle is blamed and not the smaller one. But the general fact remains that two wheeler riders are one of the most dangerous and reckless riders on Indian roads. Were the boys wearing helmets? did they have a licence? and the biggest question-what were two YOUNG boys doing at 2 AM riding a scooter? awara gardi?

Now, they were mowed down (or did they crash desperately on prajakta's car?) for one reason-to extract MONEY from the "rich people." Money for treatment was just a bullshit, these persons desperately make a mockery of the situation to extract the maximum possible compensation for no fault of the other person in question (abhijeet and prajakta) and the mob will always be on their side. Reason? "yeh dono ladke to garib the".

Now, if abhijeet came to control the situation and the girls were ready to take him to hospital, what did the 200 odd people had to do with them? Its just plain hooliganism for the sake of publicity and news channels, for TRP sakes, make a mockery of it. But i think that what abhijeet showed reeks of his responsibility as a good samaritan by trying to take the initiative, control the situation and even getting himself beaten up for NO fault of his. What the crowd did was utterly rude and uncalled for. Is this justice? I don't think so. Just because he was driving a 25 lakh rupee audi A4 doesn't mean that he is a rich person trying to show off. Heck, the A4 is so common that it goes unnoticed.

And, a 77 horsepower small sedan with 5 persons trying to race a 170 horsepower german diesel car driven by a single person? Come on, give me a break..

Shame on you the mob and those news channels for exaggerating the case just for those short hour TRPs. Do you think that am aam working class person will remember what happened last night, or even has time to remember all this rubbish? absolutely not. And as for the truths and lies of the mob, anyone can say anything but do you have the evidence or the FACTS to prove it? The police in that video said that the reports have yet to come so obviously, no true conclusion can be made unless you have the facts to prove it.

Now whatever happened, has happened, at the end, everything seems to have ended decently if what prajakta said that day is to be believed, and going by her courage an the level of maturity shown after the incident, she has to be.

Well Sid you do have a pretty good point. The whole incident does sound a bit fishy to me. The bottles could have been placed there by someone else too.

Now, taken some video grabs to make my case stronger and in favour of abhijeet and prajakta.

Now, pics of the scooter:



If this was a major crash, how come there is NO visible damage to the front end? All lights, even the handle, is indeed intact. There is no trace of any head on collision from this angle.



front side angle-there is just a small negligible dent on the outer left side body. The scooter has no blood stains or any visible scrape marks.

And, if the honda city would have hit at the angle shown, why is the front wheel and mudguard not veered off impact? Its conspiracy at its best.



the scooter looks absolutely stable in this angle. the right angle is hidden from the video, so the damage could be from that side, but EVEN if this case is true, the body should have been misaligned, which does not look to be the case. The scooter looks perfectly drivable. Even the lights, wheels and tyres are in one piece.

Now take a look at the car which has its bumper sheered off. The kind of impact shown in the scooter makes it absolutely impossible for the bumper to have just come off and leave the car in that condition. Its nothing but a sabotage by the mob. You need to understand that modern cars are built with safety purpose in mind. Low speed impact proof bumpers now come in almost every car which have modern designs, and this being a 2008 make city ZX, just a full bumper ripping apart after hitting a scooter (if it had) is next to impossible. Its a case of public riot. This damage is deliberately made it look like a high speed crash. Just for a greed of cheap publicity.

the car



close up of the dented bonnet. if a person fell on it, then the bonnet has to start deforming from the centre as per the design, but it hasn't.



a more closer look reveals that the damage is more towards the left side and the way the accident is caused, just imagine if a person had fell on it, how come the windshield has a BIGGER crack on the OPPOSITE side to the bonnet impact zone? Its a case of perfectly staged vandalism. And if the person could have fell on it, the glass should have shattered and broken inside to pieces. But it has not happened.



far side look, look at the windshield crack. hit by a stick, not a person fallen on the car. Its a case of sabotage and cheap public misbehaviour in the name of quick compensation. Were these 200 people awake at 2 AM? Notice the area under the bonnet with a v shaped dent. its the engine sub frame which has suffered the impact. Now, if this side had hit the scooter, then the scooter wold surely had become a papad. But before that, it was the bumper that should have taken the impact before veering off. If this theory still supports that the car hit the scooter from behind, why is the scooter's front or rear end not damaged?



The "victim". Other than his torn jeans, can you see any signs of bleeding or bruises, maybe other than very minor scratches on his knees? the way it was made out to be, just a minor first aid would have cured him, which was the fact later told by prajakta herself.



victim's photographs. Do they look like 19 and 16? or is it something fishy here? maybe under aged driving without a licence?



the "public account". carefully note the expressions at the back. isn't it something which we can call it "just for the sake of it..go tell false and lied stories kyonki mujhe camera mein aana hai?



yet another shot. care-a-damn attitude of the public. It looks as if this person was drunk.



prajakta's shot. hats off to you. she looks shaken but not stirred. no way of showing her scared look in her face. coolly walks into the police station and handles the matters in a calm and bold manner.



sonu nigam at 3 AM trying to address the public that nothing is serious, yet the public shuns him. yet he remains calm. he drives a 80 lakh rupee Audi Q7 SUV. does that make him a showy person? I don't think so...same with abhijeet.

I havent posted pics of the liquor because to adhere to the code of conduct, especially here where 12-18 year olds also post. The bottles were shown as empty, except for a half full liquor bottle. Now, if either abhijeet or prajakta were drunk, how come they tested negative for liquor? and if abhijeet was drunk, he would have ran off, not come back to initiate to control the situation, nor prajakta, who calmly handled her and her 4 friends and then just within less than 2 days gave a bit by bit account of her side in a matured manner.

Once again, a sad case of cheap and fake publicity by both the media and the aam junta.
Shame on you all.

And hats off to the singers, abhijeet and prajakta who stood by each other and helped in damage control.

Originally posted by: cosworthkid007

Now, taken some video grabs to make my case stronger and in favour of abhijeet and prajakta.

Now, pics of the scooter:



If this was a major crash, how come there is NO visible damage to the front end? All lights, even the handle, is indeed intact. There is no trace of any head on collision from this angle.



front side angle-there is just a small negligible dent on the outer left side body. The scooter has no blood stains or any visible scrape marks.

And, if the honda city would have hit at the angle shown, why is the front wheel and mudguard not veered off impact? Its conspiracy at its best.



the scooter looks absolutely stable in this angle. the right angle is hidden from the video, so the damage could be from that side, but EVEN if this case is true, the body should have been misaligned, which does not look to be the case. The scooter looks perfectly drivable. Even the lights, wheels and tyres are in one piece.

Now take a look at the car which has its bumper sheered off. The kind of impact shown in the scooter makes it absolutely impossible for the bumper to have just come off and leave the car in that condition. Its nothing but a sabotage by the mob. You need to understand that modern cars are built with safety purpose in mind. Low speed impact proof bumpers now come in almost every car which have modern designs, and this being a 2008 make city ZX, just a full bumper ripping apart after hitting a scooter (if it had) is next to impossible. Its a case of public riot. This damage is deliberately made it look like a high speed crash. Just for a greed of cheap publicity.

the car



close up of the dented bonnet. if a person fell on it, then the bonnet has to start deforming from the centre as per the design, but it hasn't.



a more closer look reveals that the damage is more towards the left side and the way the accident is caused, just imagine if a person had fell on it, how come the windshield has a BIGGER crack on the OPPOSITE side to the bonnet impact zone? Its a case of perfectly staged vandalism. And if the person could have fell on it, the glass should have shattered and broken inside to pieces. But it has not happened.



far side look, look at the windshield crack. hit by a stick, not a person fallen on the car. Its a case of sabotage and cheap public misbehaviour in the name of quick compensation. Were these 200 people awake at 2 AM? Notice the area under the bonnet with a v shaped dent. its the engine sub frame which has suffered the impact. Now, if this side had hit the scooter, then the scooter wold surely had become a papad. But before that, it was the bumper that should have taken the impact before veering off. If this theory still supports that the car hit the scooter from behind, why is the scooter's front or rear end not damaged?



The "victim". Other than his torn jeans, can you see any signs of bleeding or bruises, maybe other than very minor scratches on his knees? the way it was made out to be, just a minor first aid would have cured him, which was the fact later told by prajakta herself.



victim's photographs. Do they look like 19 and 16? or is it something fishy here? maybe under aged driving without a licence?



the "public account". carefully note the expressions at the back. isn't it something which we can call it "just for the sake of it..go tell false and lied stories kyonki mujhe camera mein aana hai?



yet another shot. care-a-damn attitude of the public. It looks as if this person was drunk.



prajakta's shot. hats off to you. she looks shaken but not stirred. no way of showing her scared look in her face. coolly walks into the police station and handles the matters in a calm and bold manner.



sonu nigam at 3 AM trying to address the public that nothing is serious, yet the public shuns him. yet he remains calm. he drives a 80 lakh rupee Audi Q7 SUV. does that make him a showy person? I don't think so...same with abhijeet.

I havent posted pics of the liquor because to adhere to the code of conduct, especially here where 12-18 year olds also post. The bottles were shown as empty, except for a half full liquor bottle. Now, if either abhijeet or prajakta were drunk, how come they tested negative for liquor? and if abhijeet was drunk, he would have ran off, not come back to initiate to control the situation, nor prajakta, who calmly handled her and her 4 friends and then just within less than 2 days gave a bit by bit account of her side in a matured manner.

Once again, a sad case of cheap and fake publicity by both the media and the aam junta.
Shame on you all.

And hats off to the singers, abhijeet and prajakta who stood by each other and helped in damage control.

sidji hatsoff 👏👏👏👏👏

Thanks for clearing up the confusion, Sid! I knew things weren't adding up properly!

oh wow out of every1...the 2 ones i used to think were nice =S