SRGM is unfair!!

sorry everyone, i just don't agree with the results in sa re ga ma anymore. some really good singers have been voted out of the competition while singers like twinkle and rajeev are still in the competition. it should be like before where the judges used to be able to eliminate the contestants, because at least then i agreed with most of the decisions. just my opinion.

i am against public voting, totally agree with you bollywoodcrazed .....it should definately be like before where the judges eliminate the contestants .

Absolutely true.Gajendra must be repenting for his own mistake...could not control the greed of SMS money

Public voting is definitely flawed especially in the context of this competition. This is a contest to find the best singer, not necessarily the most popular one.
Having said that there would have been problems even if judgments were made by a panel of judges. First would have been a matter of logistics...to ensure the presence of same judges over a long period of time. When judgment is made by a person or two persons they have distinct likes or dislikes even if they are experts... consequently some contestants would become slightly unfair beneficiaries.
Best would have been to have about 5 experts who all sit in isolation, not together, and make their judgments for themselves. Even mentors would make comments only after the judges have entered their scores so as not to be influenced by their comments. The sum total would be used for scoring and consequent elimination.

Originally posted by: rrajivv

Public voting is definitely flawed especially in the context of this competition. This is a contest to find the best singer, not necessarily the most popular one.
Having said that there would have been problems even if judgments were made by a panel of judges. First would have been a matter of logistics...to ensure the presence of same judges over a long period of time. When judgment is made by a person or two persons they have distinct likes or dislikes even if they are experts... consequently some contestants would become slightly unfair beneficiaries.
Best would have been to have about 5 experts who all sit in isolation, not together, and make their judgments for themselves. Even mentors would make comments only after the judges have entered their scores so as not to be influenced by their comments. The sum total would be used for scoring and consequent elimination.

I agree, that it is a good idea!

I agree to you all...Gajendra Ji has to stop taking public voting....If he really wants to ..then atleast he has to come up with one judge also who must have rights to give 2 people 2000 or more voting each...so that may be we can get good candidates..now its high time..I really think the 4 finalist must be Vineet, Hema, Nihira, and Himani...Others must have to leave by themselves...Sa Re Ga Ma Pa is not fashion show or beauty contest..its singing competition..we didn't want to see singers face. we really want good voice.

i agree with you nemo. i only want those 4 contestant in top 4.

Its no longer a talent contest. Even the contestants are not taking singing seriously since there are no judges. However they sing, the mentors of their Gharana are praising them a lot.

i agree fully , it is not singing contst now. stop public voting

i totally agree with u . i also want those 4 to be in the finals becoz they r the most talented singers. public voting has made singers like sharib leave . i mean come on . why not have judges isolated like one of the members suggested.
we really do want to have good singers . not models or anything else.
hopefully there won't be any more upsets like sharib. coz i really am losing faith in this show.