I didn't like what Ujjaini said - Page 3

Originally posted by: Meredith

I'm sure they pay these Bengali dumbos a whole lot of moolah to be biased towards another Bengali. 😡

Exactly! Yashita isn't even from Delhi. Both her and Vaishali are from Mumbai. So God knows why she performed in a city she ain't even from.

Originally posted by: nehavarun

LOL! If Raj Thackeray or some marathi person had said something on these lines, by this time he would have been in jail and the Aaj Taks and Zee news and barkha dutts of the world would have been screaming- "Marathi log Deshdrohi hain." "Raj Thackeray is villian" etc. etc. etc.

Originally posted by: Indradhanush

while I do not want to open a can of worms on this subjet, Raj Thakeray was handled very softly for what he and his party unleashed, it is shameful. Each time he was arrested his imprisonment was a token arrest, he was always treated with baby gloves, such acts by any person in India anywhere should be treated as act of treason. Among the commandos that rescued Mumbai from the terrorists, many hailed from north India. And Raj had nothing to say then. In fact, at a time when Mumbai was in crisis he disappeared from the scene (under the bed).

Read them: (if you want more I can furnish many more)

Maharashtra government 'soft' on Raj Thackeray's outfit

Raj Thackeray arrested, released on bail

Goonda-Raj won't help

I agree he was on wrong side of law. and I am not his blind supporter. he is a politician, and no politician was inside d taj or oberoi to fight d terrorists! that's not their job, is it?

i just noted how regionalism is in existence in communities like bengal..and how that is accepted, while a raj thackeray talking abt 'marathi rights' is dismissed as pure sin!
so this female said- 'bengalis will vote for bengalis only'. now tomorrow if calcatta is attacked, will non-bengali soldiers be allowed inside to fight d terrorists? or only 'bengalis will fight for bengalis'. but nobody asks this questions to bengalis, punjabis, tamils and other indians etc. though they too display lots of regionalism and parochialism. everyone just preaches to marathis, but what are they doing in their own states??? i just wish to hightlight this. coz what moral right anybody has to criticise raj unless he/she is free of regional bias himself or herself?

Originally posted by: oldblackjoe

aaah.. how could i forget?

btw did anyone see the movie deshdrohi?
i'm watching it on youtube!

u hv good taste in films. 😃
i didnt watch it coz it had insulting remarks abt King Shivaji who was d founder of d Maratha Empire.
I suppose d censor cut that part before release..actually they should hv allowed d movie without cuts..so that the marathis could see what rest of India thinks abt shivaji..

Originally posted by: nehavarun

<br><br>I agree he was on wrong side of law. and I am not his blind supporter. he is a politician, and no politician was inside d taj or oberoi to fight d terrorists! that's not their job, is it? <br>
<br>
i just noted how regionalism is in existence in communities like
bengal..and how that is accepted, while a raj thackeray talking abt
'marathi rights' is dismissed as pure sin!<br>so this female said- 'bengalis will vote for bengalis only'. now tomorrow if calcatta is attacked, will non-bengali soldiers be allowed inside to fight d terrorists? or only 'bengalis will fight for bengalis'. but nobody asks this questions to bengalis, punjabis, tamils and other indians etc. though they too display lots of regionalism and parochialism. everyone just preaches to marathis, but what are they doing in their own states??? i just wish to hightlight this. coz what moral right anybody has to criticise raj unless he/she is free of regional bias himself or herself?<br>

I m not bengali but they didnt attack bihari in bengal. Regionalism is everywhere but in the name of regionalism one shouldn't drive people from other state.

Originally posted by: nehavarun

u hv good taste in films. 😃
i didnt watch it coz it had insulting remarks abt King Shivaji who was d founder of d Maratha Empire.
I suppose d censor cut that part before release..actually they should hv allowed d movie without cuts..so that the marathis could see what rest of India thinks abt shivaji..

What Ujjani said is pretty narrow minded and tribal. She is pretty stupid to think that rest of India will welcome Bengali singer, if Bengali behaves in such tribal and narrow minded fashion. These show and channel are bringing out worst in India.

Originally posted by: girija babu

I m not bengali but they didnt attack bihari in bengal. Regionalism is everywhere but in the name of regionalism one shouldn't drive people from other state.

Originally posted by: nehavarun

u hv good taste in films. 😃
i didnt watch it coz it had insulting remarks abt King Shivaji who was d founder of d Maratha Empire.
I suppose d censor cut that part before release..actually they should hv allowed d movie without cuts..so that the marathis could see what rest of India thinks abt shivaji..

Originally posted by: sandipb

" just noted how regionalism is in existence in communities like
bengal.."

Are you serious?

Bengalis are the only people who welcome everyone in their state and do not consider them as outsiders!

Bengal is the ONLY state in India where students can sit for their school leaving exams in their own mother language (Tamil, Telegu, Malyalam. Marathi, Gujrati etc.)

Show me a single state that has implemented that!

Please do not ever ever try to insult a race (any race)!

I don't know how the moderator is allowing this Bengali bashing!

Must be an anti bengali himself/herself!