Vaishali at the Bottom ? Cannot understand - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

36

Views

4.3k

Users

15

Frequent Posters

Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: pdesh

i wonder whether these contestants have any say in these matters.....

i liked her voice but after seeing that av about her past i'm thinking twice....i think if they r going to show about some contestants past they should be fair to all the others & have an av of their pasts too....like pratibha, naina, yashita, etc....that would be fair. everyone has a past....

didn't like that Vaishali's story was projected in such a way. it cheapened the whole thing according to me.

I blame Zee for all the stories and speculations and embarassments etc. But I appauld her for her bravery and fighting spirit.👏
Pradarshak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#12
Vaishali is a very good singer, no wonder she won SRGMP Marathi. Infact I liker her Friday's performance better that SRGMP Bengali winner Shoumen.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#13
"Ishq bina kya kia" 26 Sept. Lovely.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WnxNOnUn_o[/YOUTUBE]
Indradhanush thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#14
honestly saying I can't digest the fact that these two wild card entries are there by sheer luck, ignoring talent form the same competiton.
mbharat2007 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#15
Saregapama can be considered as an entertainment program, not as a music competition. Judging whether a singer is good or bad requires expertise and knowledge and leaving this entirely for the public to decide makes no sense. Public can be swayed by many factors other than music. Not many who send their votes may understand music. Looks of the contestant, their appeal and charisma and regional biase will play a major role in public votes. It is really sad that the once meaningful Saregamapa has been so commercialised that the 'showbaazi' has taken centerstage. Mediocre contestants who are able to sensationalise the public are more likely to win over really talented, but low profiled singers.
Despite her 'Hindi' and mimicry, I can simply not believe Asma pulling more votes than Mitika or Vaishali, if singing only is the criteria for judgement. Are the SMS votes verified by any third party auditors? Perhaps Asma's wealthy father and his connections with Zee are instrumental in his daughter's progress in the competition. Sadly, she continues to survive despite there being atleat half a dozen more deserving contestants who have already been eliminated.
THE MOST POPULAR contestant will win Saregamapa, but he/she may not necessarily be the best singer.
I strongly feel that Saregamapa must return to its old formula where contestants were tested thoroughly and judged by knowledgeable experts.
mbharat2007 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: Indradhanush

honestly saying I can't digest the fact that these two wild card entries are there by sheer luck, ignoring talent form the same competiton.

1. Did you forget that last year's winner Aneek also entered as a wild card entry?
2. I can say that there are a few contestants, who if challanged purely on the grounds of music, by these wild card entries, will lose neck and crop! If Asma has to contest against Vaishali or Mitika and judged by a musical expert, do you think she will win against these wild cards?
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: mbharat2007

1. Did you forget that last year's winner Aneek also entered as a wild card entry?
2. I can say that there are a few contestants, who if challanged purely on the grounds of music, by these wild card entries, will lose neck and crop! If Asma has to contest against Vaishali or Mitika and judged by a musical expert, do you think she will win against these wild cards?

Voting is turning into a popularity contest rather than a singing contest. Long run it is not good for the show.
slimafea thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: mbharat2007

Saregapama can be considered as an entertainment program, not as a music competition. Judging whether a singer is good or bad requires expertise and knowledge and leaving this entirely for the public to decide makes no sense. Public can be swayed by many factors other than music. Not many who send their votes may understand music. Looks of the contestant, their appeal and charisma and regional biase will play a major role in public votes. It is really sad that the once meaningful Saregamapa has been so commercialised that the 'showbaazi' has taken centerstage. Mediocre contestants who are able to sensationalise the public are more likely to win over really talented, but low profiled singers.
Despite her 'Hindi' and mimicry, I can simply not believe Asma pulling more votes than Mitika or Vaishali, if singing only is the criteria for judgement. Are the SMS votes verified by any third party auditors? Perhaps Asma's wealthy father and his connections with Zee are instrumental in his daughter's progress in the competition. Sadly, she continues to survive despite there being atleat half a dozen more deserving contestants who have already been eliminated.
THE MOST POPULAR contestant will win Saregamapa, but he/she may not necessarily be the best singer.
I strongly feel that Saregamapa must return to its old formula where contestants were tested thoroughly and judged by knowledgeable experts.

I totally agree.
akanna thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#19
Well, I have a disturbing feeling that the channel only counts Phone Votes, and all the Online Votes are discarded. That would be the best reasoning behind the higher variations and indifferences in the final aired results against the expectations of the viewers. I dont believe both Mitika and Vaishali scored lower votes than Sara, Tarun and Asma. They might have gained more Phone Votes, but definitely not higher total votes if both phone and online votes were taken into account. All those people who voted online from Maharashtra and Punjab have been douped by the channel, I think! Because they dont get money from online votes!! They forget that people pay money to subscribe to the channel and pay for internet too!!! 😡
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: akanna

Well, I have a disturbing feeling that the channel only counts Phone Votes, and all the Online Votes are discarded. That would be the best reasoning behind the higher variations and indifferences in the final aired results against the expectations of the viewers. I dont believe both Mitika and Vaishali scored lower votes than Sara, Tarun and Asma. They might have gained more Phone Votes, but definitely not higher total votes if both phone and online votes were taken into account. All those people who voted online from Maharashtra and Punjab have been douped by the channel, I think! Because they dont get money from online votes!! They forget that people pay money to subscribe to the channel and pay for internet too!!! 😡

Yes it is strange. Vaishali and Soumen were introduced at the same time and one is at the top and the other is at the bottom. The results are rigged to some extent to suit their requirements I think.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".