Mala an innocent victim?

Mala was already planning to leave, Dilsher just made sure it happened, by throwing her out, why does that make a difference? I'm not condoning the aggression, just that her fault is not eradicated just because of that.

Also she wanted to take Rudra with her, quite clearly without telling Dilsher, how is that ok? Is it ok to make a child to live without their father? I don't think so. Of course Dilsher wasn't going to let Rudra go, why should he? Rudra is his son too.

Mala could've also stayed back once she realised Dilsher wasn't going to let her take Rudra with her, but she didn't. Yes she was in an unhappy marriage, but honestly I rather stay in an unhappy marriage, than give up my son for life, but her own happiness was far more important to her than her son. Of course if it was an abusive relationship then it's a different matter, but otherwise why leave your son behind? I'm not saying people should stay in unhappy marriages, just that in this case I think it's better to stay with your son, than seek happiness elsewhere, after all children are said to give you the most happiness and if you love them so much, would you abandon them? Plus she didn't seem to fight much for him, she could've easily made a legal case, but she didn't.

And lastly Mala already once seemed to say her love for Thakur was greater than her love for Rudra at one point, and she just left with him, clearly not caring about her son, but the CV's seem to have changed this? Now she's become an innocent victim in all of this.🥱 It's like in Indian shows women are only allowed to be black and white, bad or good, not in between.

Mala did wrong, the one that got hurt was Rudra, why make it out like she's so innocent? Neither Dilsher or Mala did right by Rudra.

i can see that mohini is the one who told lies that Mala left dilsher for another man but that is not true she met tejawat after she left Rud and Dilsher.

my personal view is that she should have stayed nearby so she could see Rud not just leave overnight