Posted:
Ok, ever since yesterday's episode was aired, people have been constantly cribbing about how it did not set well with the earlier track where Paro made a promise to God that she will leave Rudra once he gets well. Honestly when I watched yesterday's episode, I was a lil carried away and had all but forgotten about the vow. But as I thought about it, this is how I justified it.
I wanna start with a question.
Have you ever been in love with someone you can't be with, no matter what? Like someone from another religion, or caste or whatever? Atleast seen such a relationship, in real life, in a tv show, etc? The way they get attracted to each other, even though they know they have to get separated in the end? The irresistible attraction, the minding of each other's business even though u r not supposed to?
Or, this is the more common one, have you ever been part of a one sided love story? When you absolutely know the other person won't love you back yet you keep up hope after hopea and try knowing what the other person feels about u? In my view Paro's case is a mixture of these two, so if yes, then you wil understand my point better. If not, I can still try and lets see if I can prove my point.
Well what I want to ask is, in Paro's promise to God was somewhere a clause inserted that he will not fall In love with her till the day she leaves him? I certainly seem to have totally missed it. Because as I see it, it was a sacrifice on Paro's part, irrespective of Rudra's feelings for her.
If u have noticed, all this while, even after making that promise, she seemed to make no effort to distance herself from him. Infact she was happy when Rudra cared for her.
Her main objective was to nurse him and care for him, which she herself knew would be quite impossible without arousing in him some sort of feelings for her. She knew the love and care would touch his heart, she had herself vowed to change him with her love once before. She knew it, and she still made the promise.
I will put my case to rest by quoting two scenes in my support:
1. The scene after Rudra tells her thanks for the first tym and asks Dilsher if she reached home safe and sound. She was happy he was caring for her, and soon became sad on remembering her promise to God. But it was not coz Rudra was coming closer to her, it was coz she'd have to leave after feeling his 'love'.
2. The night Rudra breaks down in front of her. She wishes to herself that Rudra is able to open up before her before she leaves, which s only possible if he feels something for her.
My point is, as far as the vow is concerned, for Paro, the separation would have to be a sacrifice, in its truest form. But promise or not, as the one sided lover she always wanted Rudra to love her back. And till now, she thot he did. But now that his revelation has challenged all her life's ideals, she cannot not demand to know what Rudra's feelings about her are. For all it matters, she might not even be thinking about the promise ryt now, owing to the more recent storm in her life.
Note: This is just my view. U are only allowed to DECENTLY agree or disagree.
I wanna start with a question.
Have you ever been in love with someone you can't be with, no matter what? Like someone from another religion, or caste or whatever? Atleast seen such a relationship, in real life, in a tv show, etc? The way they get attracted to each other, even though they know they have to get separated in the end? The irresistible attraction, the minding of each other's business even though u r not supposed to?
Or, this is the more common one, have you ever been part of a one sided love story? When you absolutely know the other person won't love you back yet you keep up hope after hopea and try knowing what the other person feels about u? In my view Paro's case is a mixture of these two, so if yes, then you wil understand my point better. If not, I can still try and lets see if I can prove my point.
Well what I want to ask is, in Paro's promise to God was somewhere a clause inserted that he will not fall In love with her till the day she leaves him? I certainly seem to have totally missed it. Because as I see it, it was a sacrifice on Paro's part, irrespective of Rudra's feelings for her.
If u have noticed, all this while, even after making that promise, she seemed to make no effort to distance herself from him. Infact she was happy when Rudra cared for her.
Her main objective was to nurse him and care for him, which she herself knew would be quite impossible without arousing in him some sort of feelings for her. She knew the love and care would touch his heart, she had herself vowed to change him with her love once before. She knew it, and she still made the promise.
I will put my case to rest by quoting two scenes in my support:
1. The scene after Rudra tells her thanks for the first tym and asks Dilsher if she reached home safe and sound. She was happy he was caring for her, and soon became sad on remembering her promise to God. But it was not coz Rudra was coming closer to her, it was coz she'd have to leave after feeling his 'love'.
2. The night Rudra breaks down in front of her. She wishes to herself that Rudra is able to open up before her before she leaves, which s only possible if he feels something for her.
My point is, as far as the vow is concerned, for Paro, the separation would have to be a sacrifice, in its truest form. But promise or not, as the one sided lover she always wanted Rudra to love her back. And till now, she thot he did. But now that his revelation has challenged all her life's ideals, she cannot not demand to know what Rudra's feelings about her are. For all it matters, she might not even be thinking about the promise ryt now, owing to the more recent storm in her life.
Note: This is just my view. U are only allowed to DECENTLY agree or disagree.
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
