In pursuit of non-cliched reasoning - Page 50

Originally posted by: Radaz

Pri,

1) Tej leaving behind the black book, did not sit well my logical mind.

Remember, how protective he was abt that diary? He would not let Mala touch it.. And kept it with him or in a safe place.

Tej came back to the haveli, took money jewels and mala but left behind the evidence of his crime?

My justification is Tej was under lots of stress, anxiety and in a hurry to flee that he completely forgot about this ..

2) paro reaching the temple, my justification, Rudra told that army haveldar, to get whatever Paro needs, just keep her away from his room.. So i think she took help from him to go to the temple.

Originally posted by: TheMogambo

soffu...😳

we got 2...in a week...

Originally posted by: TheMogambo

He never let mala see that diary but he hid that diary under mala's sarees and petticoats ? 😕😆

Originally posted by: TheMogambo

😆😆 lekin...ramanchi in role reversal...

Originally posted by: shreya_rc

lee 🤗

yaa man ! that part was really pebble in the shoe ! mandir hain thora suddh hokar to jao. atleast i expected paro baisa to be conscious about these conventions...rudrr toh well rudrr hai, care a damn about any kind or religious norms !

and yes that teju snake's tail was on fire, he only took means to fend himself, that diary was no more precious to him...all his cronies were already arrested.

Originally posted by: hiralnehal

Lekin the primary kostin is that woh dono bagair nahaye Mandir kaise jaa Sakte hain? And one more thing... Paro ke Liye chai kyon nah in aayee... She too had woken up with her Rudra naa?