Originally posted by: Chandraketu
One thing I hate about this Rama-Hanuman battle story - Kashi-naresh (or even Raja Shakuntan in the original source, whatever it was) was a kshatriya, and it was always kshatriya dharma to protect others, not seek the protection of others, particularly Brahmans and women. Note that in this case, my sympathies are w/ Kashi-naresh - endangering him to save Rama from the consequences of exiling Sita was unconscionable, regardless of whether one agrees w/ Rama's decision or not. Here however, you have a kshatriya ruler behaving like a complete wuss, first approaching various rishis, and then approaching a woman, trying to get her to separate her son from his sworn loyalties. I appreciate that everyone values his own life, but given what the kshatriya code of conduct was, the way this ruler behaved was unbelievably cowardly. Granted, there could have been kshatriya cowards, but still, the degree of cowardice in this story was unbelievable.
I mentioned this in the daily update thread, but am posting a question related to the more generic part of the story here.