Ram going to Mithila

divareena thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
Hi 😊
In the old ramayan, they showed Ram going back to mithila to see raja janak and the queen. I hope we get to see this in the new ramayan.
What do you think?😊

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

3.5k

Users

9

Frequent Posters

Savi13 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
i would love to see this part..
but can u tell me when he visited there
rupalip thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#3
dont remmeber it
but sure
wanna see Ramji going there

chandnii thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4
yes i wnt to see dat part also
_rajnish_ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: divareena

Hi 😊

In the old ramayan, they showed Ram going back to mithila to see raja janak and the queen. I hope we get to see this in the new ramayan.
What do you think?😊


This has never happened in old Ramayana ,could not recollect . Actually king Janak came after sita banishment to ayodhya to visit Ram and tell him about a letter which sita had send to him. This was shown in older Ramayana
Edited by Rajnish_Kumar - 16 years ago
divareena thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Rajnish_Kumar


This has never happened in old Ramayana ,could not recollect . Actually king Janak came after sita banishment to ayodhya to visit Ram and tell him about a letter which sita had send to him. This was shown in older Ramayana

rajnish, that is what i meant. I remember raam going but forgot about the letter sita had sent to janakšŸ˜†
divareena thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Rajnish_Kumar


This has never happened in old Ramayana ,could not recollect . Actually king Janak came after sita banishment to ayodhya to visit Ram and tell him about a letter which sita had send to him. This was shown in older Ramayana

rajnish, i remeber ram going there but forgot that it was because sita had sent a letter to janakšŸ˜†
Edited by divareena - 16 years ago
sitakshii thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
oh wow !! that wud b great to see RAMJI going to see RAJA JANAK & MAHARANI SUNAINA !!!šŸ˜›
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#9
Rajnish, Ram does go to Mithila in Old Ramayan.
First, you're right, Raja Janak comes to Ayodhya to share his sorrow with Ram and shows Ram the letter Sita left him. Then he tells Ram that his wife Sunayana is ill because of the news of Sita's exile, and she had been so looking foward to seeing Sita after she had become pregnant (in Old Ramayan, Sunayana never came to Ayodhya to see SUMS). King Janaka asks Ram to come to Mithila to comfort Sunayana, and Ram goes along with Lakshman.
In Mithila, Sunayana expresses her anger at Ram for banishing Sita, but Janak consoles her saying Ram had to follow Raj Dharma, and Sunayana forgives him. Ram then comforts his mother-in-law and Sunayana feels better, telling Ram then she sees Sita's image in him.
When Ram goes to his chamber to takes rest, Chandraprabha, Sitaji's friend, comes to him angrily with tears in her eyes and tells him that she will write on all the walls of Mithila never to get their daughter married ever again in Ayodhya, because women are not respected in Ayodhya.
Edited by _LalithaJanaki_ - 16 years ago
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#10

Lalitha is right - they did show it in the previous serial.

But I do hope they don't show that here. First of all, Valmiki has nothing about the relationship between Janak & Rama post Sita's exile, and therefore, the servile grovelling attitude of Janak that they showed in that serial (which even irked Rama himself) was totally uncalled for. We've argued over whether Sita should have gone to Mithila instead, but I'd think that given the events, Rama himself had no right to go there now. The biggest problem I have with this 'poetic license' is the message it seems to endorse that parents-in-law should treat their sons-in-law like gods, no matter how badly their daughters are treated. (Yeah, yeah, Rama didn't 'ill-treat' Sita and did what he had to, but correct or not, that's the perception that would have been created. However, one consequence of this would have been that he'd have lost the moral right to ever go to Mithila again).

One way they could do this is move over to Mithila, and show people of Mithila expressing outrage over Sita's exile, and vowing never to allow their daughters to marry anybody from Ayodhya. In fact, spin in an Avadhi groom about to be engaged to a Mithila bride, and the news coming in of Sita's exile, and then the wedding instantly being cancelled and the groom instantly being thrown out and pelted with chappals. Yeah, it would be unfair to him since he'd possibly be innocent, but no less unfair than his compatriots were to Sita.

Other option - don't show Mithila at all.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".