RAMAYAN DAILY DISCUSSION THREAD - Page 38

Originally posted by: chen2chic

Hey yes, you have rightly pointed.... It is said that Lakshman takes a promise from Urmila that she should never cry feeling for him. It is she who boosts courage in all others. But this serial, they have shown her crying many times. But in the earlier Ramayan, Urmila was not showing crying at all. And in it when Urmila bends to touch down Lakshman's feet, he turns away and Sita says to Lakshman that you did not allow her to shed one drop of tear, and she is holding them inside. Allow her to atleast shed those tears.

And I think as per Valmiki Ramayan, Bharat also tied up his hair. The dialogue could have been taken care of. Guru Vashisht should have said 2 brothers.

Sagars always do that. Sometimes they make us awe and on the other hands they also make us to criticize!!!

Yes, at least if they have been showing Urmila crying all the time, then what is the point of that part. song playing in the bkground! honestly it was sort of insult.

and yes, either they should have shown Bharat's hair tied up or Guruji should have said 2 brothers!

Originally posted by: ananyacool

Shri Rama explains that he knew about queen Kaikeye's resolve of destroying Rakshasas and that she had taken an oath because Kekaya was in danger?? A few days back they showed Dasharatha- Ravan combat and in that encounter queen Kaikeye was shown take an oath; did she repeat that oath?? This part is a bit confusing🤔

Also its said that Kekaya was as strong as Ayodhya and thats why King Ashwapati dares to make a pact that Kaikeye's son will inherit Ayodhya's throne.......

Ananya, i was also confused bout that part. dont know what's going on! mayb Sagars themselves are getting confused with all those stories and dont know which one to follow!

Originally posted by: bharat999

Sagars always do that. Sometimes they make us awe and on the other hands they also make us to criticize!!!

Yes, at least if they have been showing Urmila crying all the time, then what is the point of that part. song playing in the bkground! honestly it was sort of insult.

and yes, either they should have shown Bharat's hair tied up or Guruji should have said 2 brothers!

Originally posted by: bharat999

Ananya, i was also confused bout that part. dont know what's going on! mayb Sagars themselves are getting confused with all those stories and dont know which one to follow!

Yeah, yeah, blame the strike for the Sagars not getting the Ramayan straight. 🤣🤣🤣Never mind the fact that this story is so old and well known that few should actually get it wrong - writers or no writers, strike or no strike🤣🤣🤣

A nice episode today. The emotions of the scenes were brought out very well. Excellent acting by all. Shathrugan looked really mature - it was realistically shown - after the 14 years, the youngest son was more mature than he had been. He too had his share of work and experience.

Originally posted by: Chandraketu

Yeah, yeah, blame the strike for the Sagars not getting the Ramayan straight. 🤣🤣🤣Never mind the fact that this story is so old and well known that few should actually get it wrong - writers or no writers, strike or no strike🤣🤣🤣

U are always so funny yaar !!😆😆😆

Originally posted by: Vibhishna

A nice episode today. The emotions of the scenes were brought out very well. Excellent acting by all. Shathrugan looked really mature - it was realistically shown - after the 14 years, the youngest son was more mature than he had been. He too had his share of work and experience.

I am confused with one thing though - are they trying to show Kaikeyi as good or bad?

Did Kaikeyi knowingly send Ram to the forest? And did she knowingly let Sita be kidnapped by Ravan? After knowing that fact did Sita go and hug her in appreciation? 😕

And after waiting so eagerly for Ram, did Kaikeyi send off the maids and musicians so soon. And why did Ram had to open the door to her chambers? Shouldn't it have been open till Ram came to see her? I thought it would have been better if Ram did not have to face a closed door to mother Kaikeyi's chamber.

I wish there would be more scenes between the family members. I had hoped Ram, Sita and Lakshman spending time with each and every one of his family members and some time with Gurudev Vashishta and Gurumata Arundati and spending some time with Sumantra and all would be shown.

Anyway, this serial is evolving into a new version of Ramayan. I had always appreciated all the efforts and hard work put into it and looked upon the serial as a new work of art. Though my views may have been different from the scenes shown in the episodes, it is nevertheless good to watch the serial at all times.

Originally posted by: Chandraketu

Yeah, yeah, blame the strike for the Sagars not getting the Ramayan straight. 🤣🤣🤣Never mind the fact that this story is so old and well known that few should actually get it wrong - writers or no writers, strike or no strike🤣🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Vibhishna

🤣

I thought strike meant less production. But, here, it seems to be in abundance with a lot of creativity. 😆😆😆