TRUTH WILL ALWAYS BE TRUTH.

THIS IS SACHIN

MANY MANY PEOPLE ABUSED ME FOR CREATING THE 'INFAMOUS AND CONTROVERTIAL' POST TITLED 'REAL TRUTH OF SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA' BUT I NEVER ABUSED ANYONE NOR I ABUSED GOOD AND NOBLE PERSONALITIES LIKE RAMJI,SITAJI,LAKSHMANJI AND HANUMANJI WHATI SAID AGAINST CHEAP PEOPLE AND BLOTS ON BROTHER LIKE SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA WAS TRUH ,THE REAL TRUTH AND TO PROVE THAT SUGRIVA TOOK TARA WILLINGLY FOR SEXUAL PLEASURES AND VALI NEVER INSTRUCTED SUGRIVA TO MARRY TARA AS WRONGLY POSTED BY SOMEONE AS REPLY TO MY POST AND MANDODARI WILLINGLU MARRIED VIBHISHANA AFTERDEATH OF RAVANA THUS SPITTING ON THE PIOUS RELATIONS OF 'DEVAR-BHABHI'.

AND

I POSTED ALL THOSE LINKS IN MY POST TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE RIGHT

THE FIRST LINK IS VERY MUCH FROM 'TULSIDAS'S RAMCHARITMANAS'

THE WHOLE CHOPAI 'JO KARTOOT VALI KIJI' WAS NOT I COOKED IN MY MIND IT WAS WRITTEN BY TULSIDASJI IN HIS RAMCHARITMANAS BECAUSE THAT IS TRUTH

SITAJI

GO AND READ RAMCHARITMANAS ONCE AGAIN WITH YOUR DADA AND DADIJI AND I AM VERY SURE THAT YOU WILL DEFINITELY FIND THAT VERSE IN RAMCHARITMANAS WHOSE VERY FIRST LINK I HAD POSTED IN MY POST
AND THE WWW.VALMIKIRAMAYANA.NET WAS THE MOST ACCURATE VERSION OF RAMAYANA ON INTERNET WITH COMMENTRIES BY FAMOUS HISTORIANS AND RELIGIOUS SOCIOLOGISTS LIKE
WHO ACTUALLY TOOK ORIGINAL RAMAYNA SCRIPTURES AND THEN TRANSLATED THEM IN ENGLISH ON INTERNET SO THAT CAN NOT BE WRONG DOUBT SUCH GREAT HISTORIANS AND TRANSLATORS WHO ARE WELL VERSED IN SANSKRIT IS JUST PLAIN STUPIDITY AND I QUOTED LINKS OF MY POSTS FROM THE SAME TRUE AND ACCURATE VERSION OF VALMIKI RAMAYANA

AND

KAMBAN RAMAYNA IS THE MOST INACCURATE VERSION OF RAMAYANA BECAUSE KAMBAN CHANGED MANY MANY THINGS IN RAMAYANA AS PER HIS WISH LIKE SUGRIAV MARRIAGE TO HIS SISTER IN LAW TARA AND MANDODARI'S MARRIAGE TO VIBHISHANA.
SO KAMBAN ALTERED THE VERY BASIC FACTS OF RAMAYANA.

IF ANYBODY WANTS TO COME AND HAS DISCUSSIONS WITH ME THEN HE IS VERY VERY INVITED,BUT REMEMBER ONE THING I NEVER ABUSED ANYHEROES OF RAMAYNA AND NOT EVEN ANY MEMBER OF DISCUSSION BOARD I JUST TOLD THE TRUTH IN MY POST 'REAL TRUTH OF SUGRIVA AND VIBHISHANA' ON THE BASIS OF CORRECT LINKS FROM VALMIKIRAMAYANA,RAMCHARITMANAS AND FAMOUS HISTORIANS LIKE AMREETA SEN.

Originally posted by: saccy_mybaba

SITAJI GO AND READ RAMCHARITMANAS ONCE AGAIN WITH YOUR DADA AND DADIJI AND I AM VERY SURE

Originally posted by: rajnish_here

thank u brother for conforming my doubt. u really need some medical cheakup of ur mind😃😃

RAJNISH JI

on what basis you think that i need a a mental consultation ?

and

in my post 'truth of sugriva and vibhishana' i have given all my points on basis of proper links taken directly from valmikiramayana and shriramcharitmanas the very first link of my post is directly from ramcharitmanas even if you still have a doubt then you are the one who must to a mental doctor not me.

rules of endogamy n exogamy differs from community to community. Even under present hindu law marriage with brother's widow is a void marriage because brother's widow comes under prohibited degree of relationship but it is valid if the custom of any particular community allows it

In Ramayan era customs followed in Aryavarata n customs followed in other parts were different. So tara followed the custom

Time, culture, customs n social norm decide the rightness or wrongness of any action plus one shud take notice of the circumstances. Do u know earlier era it was a great sin for girls to remain unmarried after 12 n for parents also it was mandatory to give their girls in marriage before puberty. But is it a sin now a days? even may religious n spiritual gurus dont consider it as sin becoz era has changed. so its no longer a sin . today child marriage is considered as a evil n not adult marriage. In NE in some communities marrying girl of a same village is considered as a great sin but is it so in other parts? no

Tara's remarriage is not wrong becoz she followed the custom of her place. I read in my hindu Law book by Dr. Paras Diwan the sages like vashishta, parashara advocated remarriage of widow under certain special circumstances

Even Manu n Yagnavalkya said that customs can overide scriptures. The king administering justice must have knowledge abt the custom of the parties to dispute.

so these remarriages were done according to the custom of the community n place. Marriage in Royal families r done with some political reasons.

before using such _______ words pls make a through research on the custom n circumstances. Every custom had some logic behind it. To fairly criticize anything make a through research on the issue

POORVI JI

Originally posted by: saccy_mybaba

RAJNISH JI

on what basis you think that i need a a mental consultation ?

and

in my post 'truth of sugriva and vibhishana' i have given all my points on basis of proper links taken directly from valmikiramayana and shriramcharitmanas the very first link of my post is directly from ramcharitmanas even if you still have a doubt then you are the one who must to a mental doctor not me.

and for sita ji i read that she must read ramcharitmanas once again with her dadaji and dadiji so what abuse or what wrong i had said please explain ?

Originally posted by: camella

leave it rk...don't reply...sachin wants to express his views..let him do what he has to....u do ur part..don't reply..if we dont like sumones views its better to juss ignore it