~Ramayan WU 9th Dec Dasharath Departs *~ - Page 2

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

By Banasura, you mean the same Banasura who alongside Shiva & Kartikeya fought & was trounced by Krishna, and whose daughter Usha abducted and married Krishna's grandson Anirudha? That Banasura?

Vidyutjeev is right from Valmiki, as is Vedavati, but then again, this serial doesn't seem to use Valmiki @ all, the disclaimer notice notwithstanding.

Originally posted by: sherlock

😆😆

You got me laughing, really. Who told you that Maa Sita was a damsel in distress? Acting like a damsel in distress & being a damsel in distress are two ENTIRELY DIFFERENT things. Queen Mandodari understood this way back when it was happening live & told her husband Raavan that while you, like an idiot, believe that you have abducted Sita, truth is Sita has actually come to lanka of her own volition to finish off you, your whole family and your kingdom. also, when Shri Hanuman meets her in Ashok vatika & says that he can take her out of Lanka & to Shri Ram immediately, Maa Sita refuses and tells him to ask Shri Ram to come to lanka asap & finish off Raavan & all his tamsic forces. now, a "damsel in distress" would look for first opportunity to get out of that distressful situation, and here the Supreme Mother is ready to wait till her husband arrives.

if you asked that question in jest, it's OK, and as I said, you got me laughing. Otherwise, I'll strongly suggest you brush up your understanding of Maa Sita, the Supreme Mother and the cause of all causes, whom Rig Ved praises thus,

"O auspicious Bhagvati Sita! We bow down to you. O Supreme Deity Sita, please be compassionate-hearted towards us."

Again, recall that sage Valmiki, the first one to record Shri SitaRam's divine leelas elaborately (remember, Rig Ved gives us probably the most concise version of Ramayan, though it bows down before Shri Ram at many places) has said, in most clear cut terms, that the divine leelas of Maa Sita is the primary aspect of Ramayan, the incidents like elimination of Raavan & his tamsic forces are merely secondary occurances. In fact, sage Valmiki goes ahead and calls Ramayan as "Sita-charitam."

Originally posted by: arti07

excuse me...read various sites... wikipedia and other critical analysis on ramayana the ppl have stressed on the word damsel in distress for sitaji...the one who silently borne all the unjust on her...never retaliated...tht is wht i have read... i asked the member genuinely and this is not the way to start the discussion tht too for the first time...probably u have read the whole epic on sitamaa but tht doesnt give u the liberty to laugh at other ignorance...if someone is asking the question either reply it in the humble manner or just ignore it...i havent cracked a joke or something ...

Originally posted by: sherlock

First of all ...let me suggest u to kindly read and understand the basic rules to talk to the strangers ...u arent suppose to laugh or mock at first place...even if u find something funny keep it to urself...

Yeah, I'm an ill-mannered bloke.😆 well i dint said tht

and google sitaji damsel in distress u will find lots of articles... kindly ask these bloggers and sites to brush up their knowledge on sitaji ...and thnks but no thnks i m watching the ramayana as i dont know about them and through the show i m getting to know about lord rama sitamaa and lord lakshmana... i m happy with it thnks anyways

Two things.

1. Why should I contact those innumerable bloggers & writers & intellectuals & scholars who are writing articles on Ramayan? As of today, I am NOT on a mission to increase humanity's understanding of Lord Ram & Maa Sita!! so y did u quote me... y me?????

2. I was wondering on this forum & saw your question. Unable to decide whether you are joking or asking, I tried to answer it, and assuming that you wish to know more, strongly suggested that you read more, starting with Vedic hymns to Maa Sita. That's all that is there to it. Now that I know that you don't wish to read anything, that's it.....first of all the question was asked to a member with whom i was discussing did i asked u ...nope...and. "u shouldnt strongly suggest something unless the person is in frndly terms its the second rule to talk to strangers"

Finally, got to go now, & no idea when I'll be back. So if you find something wrong with this post too, and wish to confront me on that, I suggest you report my posts to the moderators and let them do the needful, for I am unsure when I'll be back to reply to you....nope there is nothing i cant take care of...thnks either be kind and generous thts the first thing we learn from sitamaa if not plz dont quote others and make fun of them and i m pretty sure i m not going to reply any further coz i know the third and most imp rule to talk to strangers " stop discussing if it is leading to an worthless arguements."...