Ravan as a Different person - Page 2

Originally posted by: priyanka1311

In written in Ramayana that Lord Vishnu took avtaar as Lord Rama to kill Ravana
he used to torture Rishi Muni, Destroys yagya and a lot more..

but in this serial ravana he fight for their rights😕


what is the truth?

ramayana is written by the winning party in the lankan war ... aka Rama and his followers .

If ravan had own that war he would have written 'ravanama' where rama is shown as the bandit king trying to conspire against his region.


but basically, ramayana is a history of the conflict of the arians and dravidians , where rama represents the arian society and ravana represents the dravidians.

there had never been a demon in india. those demons described in the religious books are actually native indian dravidians

Originally posted by: beans_vanilla

he was a gr8 person & king of Lanka.the ques tht bothers me is tht why r we believing 100% wht Ramayan says!its the one sided interpretation only which shows the other side totally evil .
Ravan was a genius who fought for uplifting lower classes & acquire his reign back but he was defeated mainly by the betrayl of his own brother Vibhashan & also by some ways adopted by other side (his son was killed by other side when he was worshipping all alone without any weapons, why they did this?).he could be wrong in some ways but those wrongs were not tht big as the ones depicted.

so you are telling me, that to be power hungry is ok. Kidnap others wives and increase your queens is ok. Do not let saints and other holy people do any sacred havan etc. Kill those who do not follow them?

Tell people to worship him in place of God is ok. then what was wrong done by Hirnaksahyap, Duroyodhan, Kans. May be it is our Lord who is wrong then and may ne all these people are right. What britishers did by invading countries was not wrong either. Then what is wrong bin laden of today is doing or what taliban is doing. India should just bow down and give them what they are asking for .

All these peopel want was power and their rule but our lord was so selfish and killed them instead.

Bravo to you 👏

Originally posted by: Snape

ramayana is written by the winning party in the lankan war ... aka Rama and his followers .

If ravan had own that war he would have written 'ravanama' where rama is shown as the bandit king trying to conspire against his region.


but basically, ramayana is a history of the conflict of the arians and dravidians , where rama represents the arian society and ravana represents the dravidians.

there had never been a demon in india. those demons described in the religious books are actually native indian dravidians

In your theory where is Pataal niwasi???

My dear either get your info on mythology correct or atleast on history. Aryan and dravidians theory has been proved wrong as was a made up myth by europeons and imposed on us to prove that they are superior since they come from north.

A men , not following dharam or doing wrong ful deed is a demon even today 😛

ok then u believe cutting nose and ears of ones sister is ok! leaving ur wife after listening to a common mans comments is ok! what do u expect from a brother to do if its like throwing acid on his sis's face !
& who attacked whom? It was not Ravan who went all the way to Ayodhya to attack but it was the other side who came down all the way to south( near equator) to attack Lanka.why they dint settle down for Banvaas in North , why they travelled thousands of kilometers to Lanka? It was all under a political strategy .& who says Ravaan attacked saints , do u know his father himself was an influenced saint & Ravaan infact respected them.
Lanka was the nativeland of Ravaan's ancestors and was taken by devta's by hook & crook , then if u justify Bhagat Singh in driving away foreigners ,then whtz wrong if Ravaan re-conquered his homeland!
therz no need to accept stereotypes, read the facts, think critically & then this discussion could be more productive.

Originally posted by: beans_vanilla

ok then u believe cutting nose and ears of ones sister is ok! leaving ur wife after listening to a common mans comments is ok! what do u expect from a brother to do if its like throwing acid on his sis's face !
& who attacked whom? It was not Ravan who went all the way to Ayodhya to attack but it was the other side who came down all the way to south( near equator) to attack Lanka.why they dint settle down for Banvaas in North , why they travelled thousands of kilometers to Lanka? It was all under a political strategy .& who says Ravaan attacked saints , do u know his father himself was an influenced saint & Ravaan infact respected them.
Lanka was the nativeland of Ravaan's ancestors and was taken by devta's by hook & crook , then if u justify Bhagat Singh in driving away foreigners ,then whtz wrong if Ravaan re-conquered his homeland!
therz no need to accept stereotypes, read the facts, think critically & then this discussion could be more productive.

1. Ofcourse not. You let the later kill your wife. how can you punish a women who is trying to kill your wife.😉

As a king, you do what is right for the manhood. And yes why should you listen to a common man. Who are they. Just rule by hook or crook as you said 😆 after all common man is just a common man.

If a brother's sister was killing someone's wife, that brother should punish his sister and not kidnap the wife...simple logic but may be wrong for you😃

It was Ravan who went all teh way to North in his Pushpak Vimaan with Marich (Golden deer) to kidnap Sita and rama travelled on foot to south to rescue his wife. May be rescuing your wife is not considered a logic reason to you for travel 😉

Also Ravan was giiven several chances to return Sita and forget war, now it is Still Rama's fault for not letting him keep Sita 😆

Ravan's father was saint so does it make him a saint too 😆. A doctor's child is a doctor by birth ??? Ravan had to do what a saint does 😛

Lanka was made by Vishwakarma for God but was gained by Demons and stayed with them for long. It was won back by kuber which was not appreciated by demons as they took Lanka as their property.

The defeated king's brother makes his daughter marry the saint (Whose son is ruling Lanka😉) and uses his grand kids for his selfish reason. Yes it belonged to Ravan's ancestor and was being ruled by his brother when he took it. 😆

Bhagat Singh did not die for his selfish reason. he did not kidnap anyone and moreover

As Many of we dont know that Ravan is a great Rishi in his first life.. but any mistake made him to get shrap(curse) from one of the rishi... the shrap is that he has to live along with his whole family as a rakshas...
but after sorry to that rishi he told ravan that you and ur whole family is going to kill by lord ram in ur rakshas avtaar.. thats why as we all see in ramayan that ravan call his familymates from everywhere in the world and let them to kill by lord ram.. this is the reason...

Rawan is a Great Rishi

Ravan's father was a Rishi. Ravan was not a rishi but a very learned person. As per history Ravan in mythology and then Chanakaya in current era were the most learned person in politics.

my mom said he changes afterwards and becomes bad........ 😛

ravan's father is rishi.. n the mother is from diffrent "kul" rishi are as we know saints..they dont eat meat n kill n things.. while ravan's mom side did all this thing..
rishi married kaisaki ( ravan's mom) to remove this status diffrence...
so ravan is both...
ravan changes.. to evil man.. becuz of people instigating him.. and too much power makes everyone, feel superior then others..and there is alwayz people instigating him.. from his mother's side..rite from when he was born.. his mother n her family wanted him to take revange n take over lanka.. that was the true intention of his mother...

my knowledge 😊

wow everyone knows so much!
i just have to agree with everyone's point of views! 😳 😆