Unprofessionalism in Indian shows - Page 10

#Drea i diagree with you... its not 4lions fault.. they cant loose Ksg.. if they ask him for haircut what will they do if he complement of quitting...

There was once a man who was born in India. He studied law in England, moved to South Africa for many years, and looked the look and walked the talk. He soon got into political movements and after making history, returned to his native land, and went on a huge train ride. Struck by the poverty in this country, he doffed his clothes and wore two pieces of cloth for the rest of his life. He met royalty, viceroys, lawyers, beggars, thieves, farmers, refugees and a lot of normal people as well. He was mocked many times for his dress. His colleagues and advisors must have gone blue in the face trying to coach him on appearance, but he was always a step ahead of them. His credibility gradually overshadowed his dress, and he gained acceptance world wide. His stakes were much higher than a TV soap. He played for the emergence of a nation from colonized fiefdoms, the birth of a sovereign republic.

Originally posted by: Oldestfan

There was once a man who was born in India. He studied law in England, moved to South Africa for many years, and looked the look and walked the talk. He soon got into political movements and after making history, returned to his native land, and went on a huge train ride. Struck by the poverty in this country, he doffed his clothes and wore two pieces of cloth for the rest of his life. He met royalty, viceroys, lawyers, beggars, thieves, farmers, refugees and a lot of normal people as well. He was mocked many times for his dress. His colleagues and advisors must have gone blue in the face trying to coach him on appearance, but he was always a step ahead of them. His credibility gradually overshadowed his dress, and he gained acceptance world wide. His stakes were much higher than a TV soap. He played for the emergence of a nation from colonized fiefdoms, the birth of a sovereign republic.

He had the same character through his life, bur his persona and its different layers were reflected in his appearance. You can stiil see his bloodstained robes from his fatal gun shot wound at a museum somewhere in the capital of India.

Appearance does flesh out a new character, but that does not mean the character should be boxed in by it. Clothes or hair maketh not the man, they may reflect is persona, but they cannot change the core.

Oh yeah, and the man I was talking about, his mugshot is on Indian currency!

Did you really just compare MAHATMA GANDHI to a two bit actor?!?



P.S - MG's appearance was to make a specific point against the people who colonized us. It wasn't some petulant attempt to experiment with his look!

Totally agree with u..

Originally posted by: Oldestfan

There was once a man who was born in India. He studied law in England, moved to South Africa for many years, and looked the look and walked the talk. He soon got into political movements and after making history, returned to his native land, and went on a huge train ride. Struck by the poverty in this country, he doffed his clothes and wore two pieces of cloth for the rest of his life. He met royalty, viceroys, lawyers, beggars, thieves, farmers, refugees and a lot of normal people as well. He was mocked many times for his dress. His colleagues and advisors must have gone blue in the face trying to coach him on appearance, but he was always a step ahead of them. His credibility gradually overshadowed his dress, and he gained acceptance world wide. His stakes were much higher than a TV soap. He played for the emergence of a nation from colonized fiefdoms, the birth of a sovereign republic.

He had the same character through his life, bur his persona and its different layers were reflected in his appearance. You can stiil see his bloodstained robes from his fatal gun shot wound at a museum somewhere in the capital of India.

Appearance does flesh out a new character, but that does not mean the character should be boxed in by it. Clothes or hair maketh not the man, they may reflect is persona, but they cannot change the core.

Oh yeah, and the man I was talking about, his mugshot is on Indian currency!

Originally posted by: delena90

Did you really just compare MAHATMA GANDHI to a two bit actor?!?



P.S - MG's appearance was to make a specific point against the people who colonized us. It wasn't some petulant attempt to experiment with his look!

i am speechless seeing this comparision between MG and ksg.. this is so embarrassing to read... i lost word to react.. puke puke puke

I could not stop myself -

Originally posted by: Oldestfan

There was once a man who was born in India. He studied law in England, moved to South Africa for many years, and looked the look and walked the talk. He soon got into political movements and after making history, returned to his native land, and went on a huge train ride. Struck by the poverty in this country, he doffed his clothes and wore two pieces of cloth for the rest of his life. He met royalty, viceroys, lawyers, beggars, thieves, farmers, refugees and a lot of normal people as well. He was mocked many times for his dress. His colleagues and advisors must have gone blue in the face trying to coach him on appearance, but he was always a step ahead of them. His credibility gradually overshadowed his dress, and he gained acceptance world wide. His stakes were much higher than a TV soap. He played for the emergence of a nation from colonized fiefdoms, the birth of a sovereign republic.

He had the same character through his life, bur his persona and its different layers were reflected in his appearance. You can stiil see his bloodstained robes from his fatal gun shot wound at a museum somewhere in the capital of India.

Appearance does flesh out a new character, but that does not mean the character should be boxed in by it. Clothes or hair maketh not the man, they may reflect is persona, but they cannot change the core.

Oh yeah, and the man I was talking about, his mugshot is on Indian currency!

Oh my.. Surely the most ludicrous thing i've ever read in my time here.

Okay, retrospectively, 'one of' .. I forgot this is India-forums 😆

People here love jumping on a post without seeing the real meaning behind it. She is not comparing Karan to Mahatma Gandhi, she is just trying to say that hair or appearance does not decide the character of the person or question his dedication to his work. But obviously everyone will only pick up an example that can put down the others post and highlights their own.