I've noticed that shows, such as PV, have increasingly started to give their main female leads a romantic history, prior to the relationship with the male lead.
Letting go of unnecessary gender roles, and taken-for granted beliefs,really opens up scope for great storytelling. I was first made aware of this in GSHP. Geet's past really evened up the playing field between her and Maan. Her reluctance to open herself to a relationship, was what drew Maan closer, and made him more insistent.
Sometimes having a lack of romantic (emotional and/or sexual) experience puts the woman at a disadvantage, by giving the male lead more confidence. The girl is usually completely asexual up until he touches her the first time, and then we have the regular cat and mouse thing happen.That look of befuddled passion when she feels lust for the first time is fun, but I find I much prefer a knowing look (or at least something not so lost). It adds a little something to the equation. Plus, its just plain hotâď¸
Without some sort of experience, there are only so many places you can take your female lead without it seeming out of character. If a girl has no reason to distrust love, or even if she has no prior baggage, what's to stop her from immediately throwing herself at him?
Some shows end up doing this whole "rape past" thing with the female lead, as an excuse to give her a past, without her actually having a past. Don't even get me started on how horrendous it is to be romanticizing violence. But some shows do it (ex: Maryada, Kyunki) And they do it to open up scope for conflict between the male and female leads. One of two tracks is possible:
(1) The male hears only fragments of the woman's history, and jumps to conclusions, or
(2) The woman has a reason to distrust men (and sex) without actually have given her heart to another beforehand. Its a way of justifying her current relationship, by making her previous experience (a single violent encounter or an abusive relationship) something she hadn't chosen for herself.
In PV, Aarti chose Prashant. Her past has shaped her interactions with Yash. They would never have had the conversation they had in that last scene (where he absentmindedly re-folds Ansh's shirtđ), if she hadn't shown him distrust. If she hadn't felt she was his equal in every possible way. Her romantic history, her experience, and her maturity all contributed to the woman Yash faced in that room. I just love it when shows portray real women. Its like the Mittals said to themselves, "give the girl a past, who the hell doesn't have one these days?"
When the truth about Aarti's divorce comes out (to Yash), I want her to be completely unapologetic about it. And you know what? I think she will be. Oh she will be apologetic about the lie, but not about her past. She won't be apologetic that she had loved and "lost" Prashant. And I think that's where Yash's anger (and ArYa conflict) will stem from. She won't apologize for her history, or for being a divorcee.
Yash is very SP-like in his conservatism and belief in gender roles. He chose an arranged marriage quite happily. If he had been opposed, I don't think SP or G3 would've been against it (ex: Prateik). It leads me to believe he wanted a virginal bride. Which for him, a man who has been raised to believe in 'traditional marriages', there is nothing wrong with it. Up until now, Aarti's past (and Prashant) had been a non-factor. But we see that changing now, with Yash's insistence that Aarti trust him. He won't be able to stay away. And ironically, it is her disinterest that will make him feel safe enough to draw closer. He won't be able to control his curiosity.
But, when the truth (in the form of a man who she shares history with and made a child with), walks into his life, he will be SHOCKEDđ˛. I don't think he knows that Aarti and Prasant had a love-marriage. Is he even aware that she was orphaned?
I'm not saying he'll be angry, or that he's a chauvinist, or that it is all about sex. I'm saying the reality of competition and of who Aarti is as a person (ie: confidence personified) will be a little earth shattering for him. Intellectually, he is aware of the plurality of her sexual/romantic prowess. He knows he's not the only man for her. But when he is actually physically faced with the truth, when he watches Aarti interact with Prashant, what will he think?
He will fight these feelings of possession and (in his mind) ungrounded jealousy. But I think that is where the heart of their conflict will be. Aarti has made it clear that she has no inclination to fight Arpita's ghost. But Yash can most definitely fight a living man. And if Aarti challenges Yash to accept her past and move the hell on, how will he react? She is very patient with everyone, except Yash. She expects quite a bit of understanding and maturity from the man in her life. She will be considerate of his conservative beliefs, but ultimately very dismissive I think.
I wonder, will Yash, for a moment, look at Ansh and see him as Aarti and Prashant's ansh? Will he be angry to be so easily uprooted as Ansh's father in the eyes of people around him (or even in his own eyes)? A place Prashant didn't and doesn't want, but Yash had to work for?
Ultimately though, Aarti's being a fully empowered woman, unapologetic about the life she had led, or the decisions she made, after initially shocking him, will humble, and then enslave him.
PS: I know i'm gettin ahead of myself. But I can't help itđâď¸