History of PRC and Sanyo - Page 51

Created

Last reply

Replies

510

Views

108k

Users

45

Likes

17

Frequent Posters

rajatrangini thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
very nice posts..this story is really very intresting..
but as its history...noone can...say it in a 100% way..
we only get the info from the written matter..which gave diff opnions..
Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
Prithviraj Raso By James Todd[In brief]
This is the version used by the sagars, and acc to it Prithvi had only one wife.

The Prithviraj Raso or Prithvirajaraso is information about the life of Prithviraj IIIChauhan, a Rajput king who ruled Ajmer and Delhi between 1165 and 1192.

The '''Prithviraj Raso''' was composed by Chand Bardai, Prithviraj's court poet, who accompanied the king in all his battles. Chand Bardai belonged to the community known as Charans, whose traditional occupation is to compose poems and ballads in praise of their patrons, based loosely on historical incident; they were poets and scribes who accompanied the armies of their patrons and encouraged and exhorted the warriors to bravery in battle by reciting the great deeds of their illustrious clan forebears.
Over time, the Prithviraj Raso has been embellished with the interpolations and additions of many other authors. Only a small portion of the existing texts is likely to have been part of the original text. Several versions of the Prithivraj Raso are available, but scholars agree that a small 1300 stanza manuscript in Bikaner is closest to the original text. The longest available version is the Udaipur manuscript, which is an epic comprising of 16,306 stanzas. The language of the texts available today largely appears to be post-15th century.
The Prithviraj Raso is a source of information on the social and clan structure of the Kshattriya communities of northern India.

The story related in the epic

According to the ballad, Prithvi Raj King who, after ceaseless military campaigns, extended his original kingdom of Sambhar (Shakambara) in present-day Rajasthan, to cover Rajasthan, Gujarat and eastern Punjab. He ruled from his twin capitals of Delhi and Ajmer. His fast rise aroused the envy of the then powerful ruler of Kannauj, Jaichand Gahadwala, and caused ill-feeling between the two.

Swayamvar of Sanyogita

The story of Prithviraj's exploits spread far and wide and became the subject of much discussion among the nobility. Samyukta,daughter of Jaichand, fell secretly in love with Prithviraj and began a secret to have an affair with him. Her father got wind of this affair and resolved to have her safely wed at an early date. He arranged a Swayamwara, a Hindu ceremony where a maiden selects a husband from a number of suitors who assemble at the invitation of her guardian. Jaichand invited many princes of high rank and heritage, but deliberately failed to invite Prithviraj. To add insult to injury, Jaichand had a statue of Prithviraj made and placed at the door of the venue, thus parodying Prithviraj as a doorman. Prithviraj came to hear of this. He made his plans and confided the same to his lover, Samyukta.
On the day of the ceremony, Sanyogita emerged from an inner chamber, entered the venue of the Swayamwara, walked straight down the hall past the assembled suitors, bypassing them all. She reached the door and garlanded the statue of Prithviraj. The assemblage were stunned at this brash act, but more was to follow: Prithviraj, who had been hiding behind the statue in the garb of a doorman, emerged, put Sanyogita upon his horse and the two ran away with each other. This incident resulted in a string of battles between the two kingdoms and both of them suffered heavily. The Chauhan-Gahadvala feud led to the weakening of both Rajput kingdoms.



Muhammad of Ghor
Muhammad, hailing from Ghor in present-day Afghanistan, grew increasingly powerful. He captured Ghazni and subsequently defeated the Ghaznavid governor of Punjab. Muhammad Ghori's domain now touched upon that of Prithviraj Chauhan. A clash was inevitable.
First Battle of Tarain (1191 CE): Muhammad Ghori invaded Prithviraj's domains and laid siege to the fortress of Bhatinda in Punjab, which was at the frontier between the two kingdoms. Prithviraj's appeal for help from his father-in-law was scornfully rejected by the haughty Jaichandra. Undaunted, Prithviraj marched on Bhatinda and gave battle to the invaders at a place called Tarain (also called Taraori) near the town of Thanesar.
In face of the Rajput onslaught, the invading Muslim army broke ranks and fled, leaving their leader, Muhammad Ghori, a prisoner in Prithviraj's hands. Muhammad Ghori was brought in chains to Pithoragarh, Prithviraj's capital. He begged his captor for mercy and release. Prithviraj's ministers advised against pardoning the aggressor. However, the chivalrous and valiant Prithviraj thought otherwise and respectfully released the vanquished Ghori.
Second Battle of Tarain (1192 CE): The very next year, Ghori repaid Prithviraj's gesture by again invading Prithviraj's kingdom with a stronger army. Again, the two armies met at Tarain. The Hindus followed a traditional practice of battling only between sunrise and sunset.This practise was based upon great epics and ethics in their civilized society.The Ramayana and the Mahabharata support this practise. Ghori attacked the surprised Rajput army before daybreak and thus emerged victorious. The defeated Prithviraj was pursued up to his capital. At the point when annihilation became certain, Sanyogita committed suicide.

Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago

Prithviraj Chauhan and Sanyogta of Kannauj: Fact or Fiction?

.

Prithviraj and Jaichand: The Fatal Quarrel

On the face of it, the story of Sanyogta and Prithviraj may seem to have nothing to with the latter's wars and campaigns. But if it is true that Sanyogta's father Jaichand, already a rival of Prithviraj, was angry that she eloped with the Chauhan king, then the bad blood between Chauhan and Rathore is a definite backdrop to the geopolitics of the time. Also, if – as it is said – Prithviraj was so besotted with Sanyogta that he neglected his kingdom to the extent he was oblivious to the danger Mahmud of Gaur presented, then again we can legitimately discuss Sanyogta.

After all, this is no ordinary king we are discussing, but the man who was the last Hindu emperor of Delhi, a man of immense contradictions, and who appears to have lost his empire to the Muslims despite his magnificent warrior qualities because of a lack of diligence and a preference for the good and soft life. So from this angle, too, Sanyogta is important.

The problem is, according to R.C. Majumdar, there is no evidence to back the story. It originates from the Prithviraso, which was written much after the events it narrates.

It's also worth noting that Prithviraj and Sanyogta are supposed to have eloped in 1175. Even given that she was his youngest queen, if 17 years later the man is still so infatuated with her that he cannot think straight, we can legitimately ask if the story is as told. Kings had their favorite wives, but they had many wives. It would be a bit unusual for a wife to have such a hold for so many years that she is the cause of the king's neglecting his duties.

Our difficulty originates with the part concerning Prithviraj's antecedents. The popular story has it that two daughters of Anangpal, King of Delhi, married rival kings: Someshwar Chauhan of Ajmer, and Vijaypal Rathore of Kannauj. Prithviraj was born to Someshwar and his wife Kamladevi, Jaichand was born to Vijaypal and his wife Roopsundari. This would make Prithviraj and Jaichand first cousins, though Jaichand was much older to Prithviraj.

Furthur, Anangpal of Delhi, having no son, decided to leave his kingdom to Prithviraj, because young as Prithviraj was, he was clearly a better soldier than Jaichand. This discrimination by the grandfather in favor of the junior grandson further exacerbated the hostility Jaichand bore Prithviraj.

The problem with this story is several-fold.

First, Prithviraj's mother was not the daughter of the King of Delhi, but of Achalaraja, the Kalachuri king of Tripuri, which is today's Jabbalpore in Madhya Pradesh. Her name was Karpuradevi and not Kamladevi.

Second, Prithviraj inherited the kingdom of Delhi from his father, Someshwar of Ajmer, not from any king of Delhi. Delhi was a vassal of Ajmer, so when Someshwar died, Prithviraj got Delhi as well as Ajmer.

Third, there was no Anangpal ruling Delhi during Prithviraj's time. The closest Anangpal we have been able to locate is the jagirdar of Bhatnar [modern Bhatinda?]. He was a decendent of Bhimpal, last Shahi king of the Punjab – who was disposed of his kingdom by Mahmud Ghaznavi in the 11th century.

Anangpal, according to the story, was an Aruyvaid herbalist doctor who became close friends with Prithviraj. The later liked him so much he added to Anangpal's jagir at Bhatnar, and this inspired Anangpal to attack and recover his lost inheritance of Lahore 1179. However, he could not hold on to Lahore, was pushed out by the Muslims and died. His son Gorakrai was brought back to Bahtnar, and later became a luminary at Prithviraj's court.

Be that as it may, insofar national psyches are shaped by legends, the story of Prithviraj and Sanyogta is one of the most powerful of Indian legends. For Indians, the romance is on par with the most famous of all Western civilization romances, Paris and Helen of Troy. So while as historians we must remain skeptical, as Indians we should remain free to enjoy the story.

Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
welcome ji😳
meghaparti thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
Thanks for sharing khushi & prasant!⭐️
Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago

guys,in 2010 prithviraj raso will complete its 800 years.it was completed in 1210.so dis year be raso year nd u all will be able to see flowery work of rajput period.dis year i will make so many infos before u.i congratulate u on dis.congrats to all prc lovers.



Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
note:all the info has been collected by himanshu thnx to him
sum infos:
prithviraj raso's last chapter was written by chandra bardai's son jalhan in 1210 after prc died in 1206 a.d
guys d another info is dat samrat prithviraj chauhan was born in chaitra shukla paksha saptami
Maharaja Prithviraja chahamana DOB:24.10.1168, Queens name:Samyukta Gahadvala Prithvi's cousins:Hariraj,Govindrat,Samar singh,Udayraj,Jaichand. Kindoms ruled: 1.Himalayas in north to narmada-mahanadi in south. 2. Gujarat in west to Benal in east til d end of ganges in bay of bengal. 3.In North East upto Assam bounded by Brahmaputra. 4. In North East,upto Bhatinda. Dynasty:Chahamana, Age:around 24(at d tym of death) He was the 2nd last king to sit on d throne of delhi.At 13 he succeded d throne of delhi in 1179 ad n ruld frm twin capitals of delhi n ajmer.At 12,he kild Bhimdeva Solanki.
prc ki birthdate ke baarey main kuch nahin keh sakte coz if i will say it den a big discussion nd controversy will happen.coz these britishers have created so many confusions dat we were unable to find out his birthdate but after great research nd hardwork i was able to read some parts of raso satcharitra book wich is extinct nd from veer puran also i collected data .nd wen i made calculations d date came near 18 april 1156 i know dat i may be wrong but wen i counted it came near to it
when he died he has 5 children 2 from sanyo

thrs a cotroversy prc dnt die wen the knife was stabbed n he has ran away sumwere intoo mountains n died around 45

if u will calculate from 1156 to 1206 how will be 24? dis age 24 has been given by britishers nd i have no trust on demcoz wen i read about aryans in vedas i found british full wrong nd about age of prc the famous historic book of bundelkhand kirti sagar wich is based on folksongs nd parmal raso written in d time of prc says dat prc was of 34 wen he married sanyo
some objections by ppl
"i have no trust on sagars if they followed prc raso den why dey left so much things di,the bitter truth is dat prc is not available in ull its only few rags r dere.di i on d basis of amar chitra kathas,prc raso,prithviraj vijaya,veer purana,parmal raso,farishtey ndsome folklores of sindh nd rajasthan i made my researches.di,prc fought battle in 1191 ad but he was imprisoned by muhammad ghori for so much time nd ye sab main nahin modern researches kehtin hain 2008 ya 09 main hi 1192 ke baad ka sikka mila jis main prc aur md ghori ki tasveer thi aur toh aur britishers ne toh history hi badal daali unhone toh yahan tak keh diya ki prc ne aatma hatya ki thi aur md ghori ko khokhars jats ne mara tha jo ki ek bahut bara jhooth hain di delhi main aaj bhi kai aise sikke milte hain jo 1192 a.d ke baad ke hain aur jin par prc aur mdghori ki tasveeren hain prc ki death 1206 main hui thi isska sabse pukhta sabut ye hain ki uss vaqt koi means of transportation nahin tha uar chandra bardai sadhu ke vesh main gazni shahar gaye the prc ko bachaney toh agar hisaab lagaya jaai toh 1 saal toh unko pahunchne main hi lagega ya usse zyada maan liya ki vo vahan pahunch bhi gaye to kya vo vahan ki bhasha jaante the vo seekhne main 2 saal ka vaqt hue 3 saal,fir baat aati hain chandra bardai ne nikalne se pehle raja maharajaon aur prc ke min se zarur pucha hoga kaha jata hain ki vo thund ka vaqt tha jab prc ne trai ka doosra yudh lara yaane ki saal ka end.iss prakar md ghori ke mahal tak pahunchne main kya chandra bardai ko samaya nahin laga hoga?md ghori apne rajya main nahin rehta tha usski nazar india ke baad khurasan par thi jiss se usne apne bhai se cheena matlab ek ya do saal vahan larai main laga,sindh main uss waqt ashanti thi khokhar jat bahut utpat macha rahe the toh kya unko shant karne main ussko time nahin laga hoga,meri family thakuron ki family hain aaj se 1000 years ago hum kabul kandhar ke beech ke kuch hisse par raaj karte the hum hindushahi rajputon ke vanshaj hain hum log agar main apni parivaar ki vanshavli ki taraf dekhun toh md ghori ke time sindh main aaye aur southern sindh main arbi amiron se larkar unke raj par rjya karne lage ye md ghori ke vaqt ki baat hain toh aap bataiye ki kahan se prc javani main marey 1166 bhi maan liya jaaye toh bhi age dekhiye na maine 45 ya 40 kaha hain ho sakta hain vo 30s main aaye lekin 24 kabhi nahin ho sakti. "
Edited by meghaparti - 15 years ago
Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
guys here is the story of rani padamavati (princess of vidharba)&rajrajeshvar prithviraj chauhan.
princess padmavati was a very beautiful girl.his father ruled over vidarbha&neighbouring sides.their capital was devagiri.maharani padmavati belonged to yadava dynasty.when padmavati was of 16 years ,one day she was walking in park .a parrot saw her on seeing her he became totlly blind we can say.he thought her lips as bimbafal a type of fruit&bit it.padmavati's lips became red by blood.she caught him&took him to her room.there she aked the reason for biting her.the parrot became sorry&said that he had,nt saw a beautiful girl like her till today.he also told that she is made for prc.he was from delhi so he explained the beauty of prc hat he is like the indra of earth.his face shines like sun&so on.padmavati falled in love with prc on hearing his beauty.many years later she sent a letter to prc before a day of svayamvar.in her letter she wrote that she will die if prc will not take him with her.she told to take her in same manner as shri krina drove rukmani from shiva temple.she also sent her kundli.when prc heard that he worried but for saving padmavati from loklaj he decided to marry her.he did same as padmavati described in her letter when prc was coming back to delhi after taking padmavati ghori attacked on him but prc became victorious&left him on the fine of 2lakh gold coins.
this was the story of padmavati&prithviraj

Amor. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago

ten great historical leaders who are known as dashveers

they are-
chandragupta maurya
,ashoka
,samudragupt
,vikramaditya
,harshavardhan.
bappa rawal,
prithviraj chauhan
,rana kumbha rana sanga,
maharana pratap,
shivaji.
thy r in correct sequence n prc is on no. 7
contributed by harshvardhan
meghaparti thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: khushi909

ten great historical leaders who are known as dashveers

they are-
chandragupta maurya
,ashoka
,samudragupt
,vikramaditya
,harshavardhan.
bappa rawal,
prithviraj chauhan
,rana kumbha rana sanga,
maharana pratap,
shivaji.
thy r in correct sequence n prc is on no. 7
contributed by harshvardhan



Thanks for sharing dear!⭐️

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".