History of PRC and Sanyo - Page 27

Originally posted by: nicemali

Defeat of Prithviraaj Chauhan: Khwaja Garib Nawaz
http://anwarulmuzaffar.blogspot.com/2006/12/defeat-of-prithviraaj-chauhan-khwaja.html

Thanks nicemali for sharing another perspective of defeat of Prithvi and the details about it. In the end of article as it is written that aim of Khwaja was to root out ignorance and oppression, if this is to be believed true then he would never have done so ! as it is history of India which narrates many women were raped many people lost their lives, wealth etc after invasion of Ghori. The article seems to be biased and distortion of historical facts.

Originally posted by: meghaparti

Note:

Well Lakshmi dear..I read each & everything what u both have written & I also agree to what u r saying dear...but I just made a note so that a healthy discussion take's place here & none of u take it personally....I know both of u are matured enough to understand what i am trying to request both of u..This issue is very sensitive & it's better if u drop the idea of discussing this point in this thread...as it may hurt some member's on our PRC section!

Hi Megha,
I dont think the posts by Lakshmi will hurt the feelings of ppl here. Although the issue is sensitive, but I dont think what Lakshmi has written can create controversy or hurt feeling of any one. Its discussion on history and not on ethics or teachings of any religion. The way she answered that although ghori was muslim but all muslims are not ghori..was a good answer to end the futile discussion of bringing religion in this discussion. In my opinion just because Ghori or some one is Muslim, his/her actions can't be labelled as Islamic.
If Prithvi would hate muslims then why did he helped Mir Hussain and gave him protection? why did he forgave Ghori when he was defeated?

Originally posted by: meghaparti

Dear munyr I m not stopping lakshmi from discussing this matter.What I am trying to say is that just be careful so that any word or sentence written by her on this issue doesn't hurt any other member on this Section sentiments..because there might be few answer's on this thread but a lot of people read this thread & I don't want other member's on PRC section creating an issue out of what gauri & Lakshmi ae discussing here...& feeling hurt..Though I agree with u what lakshmi has posted doesn't hurt anyone I am just asking my dear friend Lakshmi & gauri to not take this issue too a long extent so that we have heated discussions here on this issue & later on then I have to close this Topic..because of this discussion ..This topic is a Thread where we post histroy of PRC & Sanyo...I hope darling u understand!

Now I agree with you 😛

Originally posted by: munyr123

Thanks nicemali for sharing another perspective of defeat of Prithvi and the details about it. In the end of article as it is written that aim of Khwaja was to root out ignorance and oppression, if this is to be believed true then he would never have done so ! as it is history of India which narrates many women were raped many people lost their lives, wealth etc after invasion of Ghori. The article seems to be biased and distortion of historical facts.

THANKS 4 D INFO

Originally posted by: munyr123

Now I agree with you 😛

Originally posted by: munyr123

Hi Megha,
I dont think the posts by Lakshmi will hurt the feelings of ppl here. Although the issue is sensitive, but I dont think what Lakshmi has written can create controversy or hurt feeling of any one. Its discussion on history and not on ethics or teachings of any religion. The way she answered that although ghori was muslim but all muslims are not ghori..was a good answer to end the futile discussion of bringing religion in this discussion. In my opinion just because Ghori or some one is Muslim, his/her actions can't be labelled as Islamic.
If Prithvi would hate muslims then why did he helped Mir Hussain and gave him protection? why did he forgave Ghori when he was defeated?

Thanks for the information nicemali but dear....Though it may be a fake story or we can read facts in the above given thread but we really don't know which version of PRC is correct & really true...Well as far as I am concerned I would like to go by what sagar's are showing!😳

Originally posted by: meghaparti

Thanks for the information nicemali but dear....Though it may be a fake story or we can read facts in the above given thread but we really don't know which version of PRC is correct & really true...Well as far as I am concerned I would like to go by what sagar's are showing!😳

book (Decisive Battles India Lost (326 B. C. to 1803 A. D.) By Jaywant D. Joglekar (page 43