Yesterday while reading Bombay Times...a very popular newspaper in Mumbai..I came across an article writen by Subash.K.Jha...He is a very inteliigent writer apart from being a gr8 film critic...
He had written an article on Jodha Akbar..basically highlighting Hritik's performance...The article was very well written..n Hritik undoubtedly deserves all the applaud n praise for his unmatchable brilliant performance as Akbar in Jodha-Akbar...
Subash K.Jha mentioned dat.."There can be no other face for Akbar other than Hritik.."I agreed...But this one thing dat he mentioned which I completely don't agree to...he writes..'No other actor can bring out an historic character as beautifully n as well as Hritik"..I completely disagree...
If Hritik will always be the face for Akbar then RAJAT ALWAYS WAS, IS N WILL BE PRC in the hearts of thousands of people like us...Rajat at such an young age brought out PRC so extremely well...his performance in PRC is par excellence...I don't understand why do such intelligent people like Subash.K.Jha under estimate the power of television...n actors as fine as Rajat who hv taken television to another standard alltogether with their brilliant performances bringing out characters as gr8 as PRC...
I know there is no comparing between Hritk n Rajat..Hritik..34..the son of Bollywood's most esteemed producer-director Rakesh Roshan...n born n bought up in a silver spoon...given the best of training n all..Rajat on the other hand..a common guy...cumin form a normal middle class background...a face from amongst the masses...But he did bring out PRC like no other actor possibly could have...at such an young age of 17..We can't imagine anyone but Rajat as PRC...
After reading the article...I seriously felt this...wat is ur take on it???