Originally posted by: Krishtigya
Hey Mkapians,
Guys..I know we are all angry with the fact that Kriya are trusting ASY but from their point of View, that ASY, did save Krishna's life right.. it was us, the audience, who were shown that ASY put the wires in the tub..not Krishna or pratigya knew that right..also ASY didnt hit Krishna back as its us, the audience who know that was because ASY was leading Krish to the tub..to Krishna he must have felt that ASY was genuinely sorry for his deeds.
Guys each and every time Krishna prooves that he is so distinct from his brothers and such a good hearted person..on one side we have Krishna who only on ASSUMING that ASY saved his life is being good to him and wants to take him home..he is so greatful to him on the contrast we have ASY..this guy is out to take the life of the guy who ACTUALLY saved his life and that too for a wrong which ASY did and believes Krishna is the one at fault rather than himself for taking such a bad decision of fighting case from SS side..such a loser and Krishna is such a gem of a person.
Guys I hope the track is good..CVS only keeping Kriya as targets doesnt work..we need more of Kriya scenes too..
I agree with most of your post, with a few exceptions. The two brothers are gray characters, and we can't explain every single action of theirs. They both have some of SS in them, and it's coming out here in the track. No, Abhimanyu didn't hit Krishna back only because he was leading him to the tub and maybe he thought this would be easier. Also, he being a lawyer, didn't want his fingerprints on Krishna's body when it was found. Again, why did Abhimanyu want to apologize in such a private place with no witnesses? That is no different from Sarju and his men waiting for a hidden location to deal with Prats.
When Krishna saved Abhimanyu's life, it was part of a condition he set for Abhimanyu and his mother. He saved his life, only to force them to leave the haveli not because he wanted to be a good brother. He didn't do it for Abhimanyu so much as he felt for the mother. Whereas when Abhimanyu saved Pratigya's life and when she saved him, it was more clean because neither of them had time to react and they weren't trying to reap any reward from it. Also, more than any of that, Krishna would not have had to save Abhimanyu's life had he not been poisoned in the first place by Shakti during the match. They never traced the poison back to Shakti apart from Prats' accusation. If you want to blame someone, blame Shakti. This isn't to say Krishna isn't a good person, he is great. He couldn't see through Abhimanyu's motives so far, but wanting to bring him home may reveal that he does indeed blame him. He may be acting like he doesnt, but he is the same one who saved the Saxenas from the damage Abhimanyu caused in their lives. Komal is the smart one here, she sees Abhimanyu's character coming out. Krishna and Abhimanyu are both playing games, neither one is being honest imho.
Abhimanyu is using Krishna once again to get to their father. He doesn't bother with Shakti because the guy isn't someone SS really cares about. He feels that if he has lost his career in law, then he should have the satisfaction of getting back those responsible.
Members Lounge
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
Cricket
