I am sorry but I have to say I agree with Krishna in one dialogue he sed to Pratigya. He sed that whenever Pratigya says something to him, its right and he listens to her but whenever Krishna says something to her, she always says its wrong and never listens to him at all. Communication is a two way thing but from Pratz side she is failing to listen to her husband like he listens to her. All Pratigya knows to do is to tell Krishna her way is the right way and she doesnt give him a chance to voice his opinion on anything. Pratz says something and leaves it so Krishna doesnt get a chance to say what he feels.
Sometimes Pratigya has to look at herself and correct faults in her as her actions always leave her husband in difficult circumstances without knowing the consequences for it. He listens to her always but she hardly listens to him. Since the adarsh murder case has been solved, its always been Pratz talks and Krishna listens but now there has to be a time where Krishna talks and Pratz listens as its high time she does.
Krishna loves Pratigya with all of his life and trusts but sometimes a husband wants his wife to listen to him & not always do what she wants and go against him & put him in awkward situations againsts his family. People are saying that Krishna didnt trust P yesterday when he argued with her but with Pratz always not listening to Krishna's view doesnt that mean she doesnt trust his opinions too? Its a two way thing if u play the trust card there. Why is it always Krishna who has to shut up and listen to Pratz, sometimes she has to shut up and to her husband too. Its a two way thing.
Pratigya deserved what she got from Krishna yesterday as he disagreed with her and not always saying yes to her. She has to listen to what he has to say as its about time she does.
P.S- There will be no MU between as Pratigya will manofy her baba but this has to be seen as a warning to her that she has to take Krishna's opinion and views & listen to him too and not always dominate their conversations.