Anybody here a Thakur?

elle45 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#1

After watching the Thakur family on MKAP, I now want to know more about what being a Thakur means. I'm not from that part of the world where we have Thakurs, and so I'd like a bit more insight into this.

Being a THAKUR, as I understand, is considered a status symbol, you think of yourself as royalty, you are rich, you enjoy a prominent position in society.
I'd like a brief history as to why Thakurs are considered superior to other classes, is it because they might be land-owners or big businessmen?
Do they really not consider education a necessity?
Do they still enjoy such a good social standing, like most of them being politicians and people of influence?
Do they really have a reputation of being ruthless like Sajjan Singh in the show?
How are Thakur women treated? Surely there must be many cases of highly educated women of Thakur origin going on to good positions career wise?
Is there any such thing as a poor Thakur?
I do not mean to intentionally or unintentionally hurt the feelings of anyone on the forum, whether they belong to a Thakur family or not. I just think that the serial shows that a THAKUR parivaar will be ruthless, uneducated, uncouth..... this might be a wrong image, as in this day and age, maybe real-life Thakurs are just as well-educated and civilized as others?

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

1.2k

Users

6

Likes

7

Frequent Posters

hussainramso thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#2
Elle,
Although I am from both India and Pakistan.......don't ask! I'm a little more familiar with landowners in Pakistan. Many are uneducated and yes they are ruthless. That is not to say that all are like that.
elle45 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#3
Yummi, I know about the feudal system in Pak and I guess you're right, we can probably equate the Thakurs we see on TV to them. They dont need to get educated coz they have all the money they need. They get women as and when they need it based on their power. They rule with an iron fist and no one dare defy them.

But is this the way most Thakur families are in India?
MERARAI thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#4
elle

I am not a Takur but as you can tell by now, sometimes I am a TALKER.😆 I personally see the classification based on caste, creed, color, race, religion, etc. as demeaning of human spirit for fundamentally we are all the same.

If you look at the hiearchy in the caste system which is really a class system, there are four of them based on what they did for a living. The Brahmins (scholars, teachers, priests etc.), kings and warriors were called Kshatriya, the merchants/traeders were Vastriya, and then there were those that served the other three classes. It is good to see that these classifications though still existant in some parts of India is blurring it's boundaries as more and more people are marrying outside their castes and religions. 👏

SS once said to Krishna they are the descendants of royalty which would then classify them under Kshatriya. Earlier on in the show the caste discrimination was highlighted with SS refusing to accept Prats as a bahu bec' she was a Kayastha (followers of brahmina and kshatriya traditions).
elle45 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: MERARAI

elle

I am not a Takur but as you can tell by now, sometimes I am a TALKER.😆 I personally see the classification based on caste, creed, color, race, religion, etc. as demeaning of human spirit for fundamentally we are all the same.

If you look at the hiearchy in the caste system which is really a class system, there are four of them based on what they did for a living. The Brahmins (scholars, teachers, priests etc.), kings and warriors were called Kshatriya, the merchants/traeders were Vastriya, and then there were those that served the other three classes. It is good to see that these classifications though still existant in some parts of India is blurring it's boundaries as more and more people are marrying outside their castes and religions. 👏

SS once said to Krishna they are the descendants of royalty which would then classify them under Kshatriya. Earlier on in the show the caste discrimination was highlighted with SS refusing to accept Prats as a bahu bec' she was a Kayastha (followers of brahmina and kshatriya traditions).

I agree with you completely regarding the highlighted part 😃 I do not understand how ppl can think that they are better than others by birth. If anyone is born in a family of higher social standing, it does not automatically make them a better person. I think your actions and intentions make you the better person, not your family history. All this discrimination is very irritating 😡
However, in this show, it's not only the Thakurs who have discriminated, the Saxenas are more at fault I think. I haven't seen the earlier episodes but I can well imagine how SS would have reacted to Krishna marrying from another caste. However, as far as I can see, he agreed to marry even Komal to non-Thakurs, and later on even accepted Arushi in the blink of an eye.
The Saxenas on the other hand, constantly discriminate against the Thakurs. They consider themselves superior due to their education. Both families, esp the Saxenas, need to get off their high horses and consider the other as their equals.
Rahm thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#6
Elle, I actually come from a line of landowners--both from my mom and dad's side. My grandfather actually never worked a day in his life, however, he was extremely kind to anyone that has ever worked for him and my grandmother is quite an outspoken lady. She pretty much ran the house. We still give people salaries that don't work for us anymore as they're too old.. kind of like a pension.

I think landowners are considered superior because they have tons of money.

Not true. Education is valued highly in my family, however, it wasn't like this for my grandfather and his brothers while they were growing up.

I believe they do especially when it comes to marriages.. I've seen a lot of people take pride in being married into such families.

Probably. While my grandfather was alive, no one was allowed to walk with their shoes or umbrellas past our house. *shrug* I was told that it wasn't something enforced, but people did it out of respect.

I don't know about other families, but in my own women are treated pretty well. As I said, my grandmother ran the house. My grandfather never laid a hand on her the way SS does to Amma.

Of course there is! There's plenty of landowners that have lost their property and such.

I'm from Bangladesh so I'm giving you the Bangali version of landowners.. don't know how it is in India/Pakistan.
elle45 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#7
Thanks for replying Rahm 😊 Good to hear that you come from a family which has progressed as time goes on, and which actually respects women, respects the employees, and believes in education. Is this the norm for most families, or are you guys the exception?
I guess there's different types of families everywhere, some good, some bad, and we really can't judge them all together. With the Thakur family in our serial.... it's like saying one bad apple spoils the bunch. They are the exceptionally evil Thakur family which is giving a bad name to all Thakur families everywhere.
Rahm thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#8
Elle, I don't really have much knowledge about landowners and whatnot. I grew up in NY.. only went back for summer vacations so don't know really know much about other families. My grandfather and grandmother both died and their employees are still paid. When my grandfather was alive, he gave a portion of his property to the people that worked for him and built them houses (with his own hands). There's a college named after my grandfather there as he had it built (that's actually in the city area--we live in the village area).

A couple of the employees are actually like family to us. When one of them got paralyzed waist down, my grandmother actually cleaned after her herself because she wasn't able to actually get up and go to the bathroom.

Despite having so many employees, my grandmother preferred to wash her own clothes, clean her own room and bathroom and even clean and cut the food that was to be cooked. The employees basically took care of the rest of the house and 3 of the gardens. The garden that is situated right outside of the house, my grandmother took care of that.

The whole Thakur ruthlessness is new to me because I've always seen the exact opposite at home.
Filza. thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: elle45

Yummi, I know about the feudal system in Pak and I guess you're right, we can probably equate the Thakurs we see on TV to them. They dont need to get educated coz they have all the money they need. They get women as and when they need it based on their power. They rule with an iron fist and no one dare defy them.

But is this the way most Thakur families are in India?


Elle, what you have mentioned about feudal system in Pak is true but to a certain extent... yes landowners are influential and some are ruthless too. But like yum mum said not all are cruel... yes some are and they spoil the name of all 😔

I know about Pak as i belong to a landowning family from there that is in politics as well, but here there is no fear there is respect.. yes we rule but with people's support.. they themselves come to us for solutions to their problems only and only cuz they respect and trust us...

education is important... in my family it entirely depends on an individual's thinking... family has no such rules strictly against acquiring education... Some do believe there is no point in getting educated cuz they need not to work as they are earning anyway and have all the privileges, education is considered important only to groom yourself, to be a better person and not necessarily for getting a job... but some consider it is important to get educated...

from my grand father, great grand fathers time education have had an importance..

nope women are not considered as a property... in fact women are treated with a lot of respect... its the women who rule the house, many are working and are in politics as well... again that is how it is in my family.. cant say about all..


Edited by Filza.T - 14 years ago
carisma2 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 14 years ago
#10
ELLE NICE POINTS,
Some of these thakurs take advantage of their postion, from what i know from telly and movies.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".