Cvs! Will Good prevail over Evil. - Page 4

Originally posted by: steffroc

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

And this is the person that told anusarkar to chill . Anu's post was comparatively very mild ...........she was merely telling cVS her views . This post however condemns anyone not agreeing with her views and expresses shock and a high degree of intolerance .

Now if I were to employ my powers of deduction by reading your consistent support of Pratigya whatever rubbish she does , I would immediately jump to the conclusion of you having gone beyond the state of denial and having entered the OBSESSED category and that your geographical background was the PLANET MARS but then I would not even come close to Watson would I .

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

A most foolhardy and incredibly silly woman if I may say so pardon me . My personal opinion of course . Marrying stalker , thinking revenge will be succesful , assuming stalker will sleep seperately on sofa , actually believing the way to survive in gunda family is by threatening them with police on their own turf when ALL her experiences with police have been that of an extremely corrupt lot ...

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Thanks anu for taking the trouble to define good and evil. 👏 it is quite absurd that some members of this forum ask and need to be told such basic things - they have gone so far in their stance of moral ambiguity that even such basic primers are not out of place.
No wonder they object to bhashans - they are so unused to exercising their moral judgement, it is no doubt a great strain on them.
Bubble

Really ? You know soooooo much about the members that u just criticized , do you ? That they are unused to exercising their moral judgement , its a strain on them etc etc ? Such sarcasm , flowing so freely to describe the members who dont like Pratigyas bhashans ? Those members use sarcasm to critique a cHARACTER ............PRATIGYA , u guys use it to bash the MEMBERS . And all that wonderful sarcasm was for what ? Just coz some members dont like Pratigya's bhashans ........meaning this sarcasm is for intolerance of aNOTHER POINT OF VIEW . The intolerance is so much that you attack the members , not even their argument . And you are talking of exercising moral judgement and all ?😆 . Its not that we cannot be as sarcastic as you were u know . WE CAN . We do it with the characters , not u guys coz we don't believe in attacking MEMBERS for a CHARACTER . For instance I could have retorted to the above post by saying THOSE WHO LOVE HER BHASHANS PERHAPS LIVE IN A BUBBLE or THOSE WHO LOVE HER BHASHANS HAVE NO MINDS BUT BUBBLES but I refrained from it . It would be so juvenile wouldn't it .

Originally posted by: Dyehard

@ Large - It is impossible for me to convey how DEEPLY offensive that statement is.
Too even suggest that Justice is the prerogative of the advanced west and that the barbaric, backward societies of the East should content themselves with Anarchy and Gundaraj - Do you even have an idea how that sounds? 😲
I can only hope you have been so lost in wanting to win a point in this matter that you have allowed you tongue to run away with you. If that is not the case, then there is nothing to say to you.

Originally posted by: Dyehard

Are there two opinions about MURDER? I had not previously believed so. You have a tolerance for murderers on this show, and you expect me to have a similar tolerance for you. My mind is simply not that elastic. Kool, I had genuinely never come across anybody who openly approved of evil before. Nobody in my previous experience had ever aligned themselves in public with such glaring inequities. I am naturally shocked, and express my shock. But if you tell me that there is something in you that finds these types of people tolerable and even attractive, I just have to let you be.
But when I find a statement that I disapprove of, made in a public space, I am compelled to counter it.

And when I ask Anu to chill, it is because I gauge her equal to comprehending a subtlety.😊

My dear , I don't expect any tolerance from you , in fact I don't expect anything from u AT ALL . Who told u I expect tolerance from YOU ? If your deductions from opposite viewpoints are that the others have TOLERANCE FOR MURDERERS I really don't find YOU equal to comprehending SUBTLETIES and there the matter ends . But I really felt poor Anu's post really didn't desrve the CHILL comment ..........She has as much a right to talk to CVs as anyone else like u and ur coterie .........Bubble and SAM . Who when they have no way of counterarguing , instead of merely leaving the topic , sit and start discussing about the mental and moral capacities of the opposite Point of view members .

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

And this is the person that told anusarkar to chill . may be first and last person too...😆 Anu's post was comparatively very mild .....wahi tho...😉......she was merely telling cVS her views .aur nahi tho kya?😃 This post however condemns anyone not agreeing with her views and expresses shock and a high degree of intolerance . 😕 😕 😕 but kool.... how do i know that i may not agreeing with great lawyerwa post before reading it...hun?...how do i keep my degree of intolerance under control while sarkarji brings such a great post hun?😕. without even caring or feeling bad that as soon as she opens the thread it get locked.....😆 😆 😆...

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Thanks anu for taking the trouble to define good and evil. 👏 it is quite absurd that some members of this forum ask and need to be told such basic things - they have gone so far in their stance of moral ambiguity that even such basic primers are not out of place.
No wonder they object to bhashans - they are so unused to exercising their moral judgement, it is no doubt a great strain on them.
Bubble

Really ? You know soooooo much about the members that u just criticized , do you ? That they are unused to exercising their moral judgement , its a strain on them etc etc ? Such sarcasm , flowing so freely to describe the members who dont like Pratigyas bhashans ? Those members use sarcasm to critique a cHARACTER ............PRATIGYA , u guys use it to bash the MEMBERS . And all that wonderful sarcasm was for what ? Just coz some members dont like Pratigya's bhashans ........meaning this sarcasm is for intolerance of aNOTHER POINT OF VIEW . The intolerance is so much that you attack the members , not even their argument . And you are talking of exercising moral judgement and all ?😆 . Its not that we cannot be as sarcastic as you were u know . WE CAN . We do it with the characters , not u guys coz we don't believe in attacking MEMBERS for a CHARACTER . For instance I could have retorted to the above post by saying THOSE WHO LOVE HER BHASHANS PERHAPS LIVE IN A BUBBLE or THOSE WHO LOVE HER BHASHANS HAVE NO MINDS BUT BUBBLES but I refrained from it . It would be so juvenile wouldn't it .

Originally posted by: steffroc

look i didnt mean to offend you

ur constantly passing personal remarks on me and i am keeping quiet

i am NOT saying to not voice against EVIL but i am saying the way u should FIGHT AGAINST EVEL IN EASTERN COUNTRY: i felt the way pratigya fought against it wasnt right but i am not saying NOONE SHOULD fight against evel in those countries.

look that mathur is powerful he can help Pratigya fight against SS. ok SS is in jail but what about krishna whom will he support obviously his parents. And I SAID IF HE STAND W ITH HIS PARENTS wont blame him at the end of the day they are his parents and we cant change it. ALso if SS is evil Krishna still loves his dad.

Pratigya has to decide which way she wants to take. if she had joined hands with Mathur and foguth against Evil it is understandable but if she lonely fights with SS i think its baseless as she is weak infont of SS ( without Krishna) e.g in the case of Amma and shaktia Krishna took them out of the jail what could P do?

for a family like Sucksena in east its not possible to fight against evil without help from strong party

PS: u have constatly pointing me out and making personal remarks as i love Evil and bad people in the world and as i am supporting criminals.

i dont think u have got my point no further discussions with you. I dont think u will stop bashing me