CAKE KA TAMASHA 14.1
🏏New Zealand Tour of India 2026: 2nd ODI: At Rajkot on 14/01/26 D/N🏏
TRUTH IS OUT 15.1
Republic Rhythms: Aazadi Quest SEASON 2 ~ Sign Up Thread
Akshaye Khanna In Dhurandhar 2
Out Now - Official Trailer - Border 2 - Sunny Varun Diljit Ahan
I finally understood why suchu is cast!!!
🏏WPL 2026: Match 7: DCW vs UPWW at DY Patil on 14/01/26🏏
Celebs Voting BMC Election
Rani Mukerji's BO supremacy
Has Kartik Aaryan Been Removed From Dharma Agency
🏏WPL 2026: Match 8: MIW vs UPWW at DY Patil on 15/01/26🏏
Ariya OS: The Silent Analyst
You can use a mace against a bow if you throw it hard enough.
However not everyone is built to be an archer.
It's like saying: People can make the most money by becoming a businessman, then why do people bother to become doctors, actors or other professions? It's all personal choice and interest, plus not everyone is built to be a businessman. Some people are built to be other things.
A lawyer can't be a doctor, as they require different forms of intelligence. If you're a scientific person then doctor if you';re a humanities based person then law.
You can use a mace against a bow if you throw it hard enough.
However not everyone is built to be an archer.
It's like saying: People can make the most money by becoming a businessman, then why do people bother to become doctors, actors or other professions? It's all personal choice and interest, plus not everyone is built to be a businessman. Some people are built to be other things.
A lawyer can't be a doctor, as they require different forms of intelligence. If you're a scientific person then doctor if you';re a humanities based person then law.
Originally posted by: Cotswolds
While I completely agree with your viewpoint, the analogy of lawyers and doctors do not fit snugly fot the current question. Lawyers, docs can be as successful in their own profession as businessman and make tons of money and. Can be complimentary to each other.For current question... In the battle only sure way to win is with bow-arrow as other weapons are quite ineffective infront of it. Mahabharat story talks about so many dangerous missiles all related to arrows. Hence, any prudent,practical king will try to master and perfect this skill as much as possible.Who in right mind will be trained on sword play in current army rather than rifles and cannons. If someone wants to learn swordplay as a hobby or to focus on chi, its a diferent tory.
You can use a mace against a bow if you throw it hard enough.
However not everyone is built to be an archer.
It's like saying: People can make the most money by becoming a businessman, then why do people bother to become doctors, actors or other professions? It's all personal choice and interest, plus not everyone is built to be a businessman. Some people are built to be other things.
A lawyer can't be a doctor, as they require different forms of intelligence. If you're a scientific person then doctor if you';re a humanities based person then law.
Originally posted by: Cotswolds
Bow and arrow is shown to be most effective weapon in kurukshetra war. This is used by everyone includind duri, dussh, bheem, nakul etc. the arrows can annihilate army of thousands easily with its celestial missiles while other "inferior" weapons such as sabre, nmace, spear were effective only in personal one to one combat and were ineffective at mass destruction.
So why will any king learn other weapons if arrow-bow is so supreme ? It does not make sense from practical sense. Whats the point being best at mace, sabre when one can not defend and counter attack against bowman ? And yes people have fought with each other using different weapons.